Hi folks,
This conversation is over. If we can't have a conversation about highway
tagging without making personal attacks, then we can't have the
conversation.
Please work harder to stay on topic, have empathy towards your fellow
mapper, and have constructive conversations.
The mailing list is
The reason you don't get it is because you are not listening. Nobody has said
the motorway tagging should continue through the intersection. The debate is
entirely about where the classification change takes place. There are several
instances in Arkansas where a motorway ends similarly. In
Links please?
On Sun, Dec 2, 2018, 3:06 PM Paul Johnson
>
> On Sun, Dec 2, 2018 at 5:04 PM Evin Fairchild wrote:
>
>> You are proving my point once again re misrepresentation of what we're
>> saying. It would only be accurate for you to say that we're going against
>> federal guidelines is if
Sure thing, go back to about the last year of his edits.
On Sun, Dec 2, 2018 at 5:06 PM Evin Fairchild wrote:
> Can you provide changesets showing where NE2 mass edited motorways in the
> way you're describing?
>
> On Sun, Dec 2, 2018, 3:02 PM Paul Johnson
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Dec 2, 2018 at 4:58
On Sun, Dec 2, 2018 at 5:04 PM Evin Fairchild wrote:
> You are proving my point once again re misrepresentation of what we're
> saying. It would only be accurate for you to say that we're going against
> federal guidelines is if we were to say that the motorway should continue
> thru the at
Can you provide changesets showing where NE2 mass edited motorways in the
way you're describing?
On Sun, Dec 2, 2018, 3:02 PM Paul Johnson
>
> On Sun, Dec 2, 2018 at 4:58 PM Thomas Silas wrote:
>
>> As for the situation in question: I agree with the vast majority of the
>> posters both in the
You are proving my point once again re misrepresentation of what we're
saying. It would only be accurate for you to say that we're going against
federal guidelines is if we were to say that the motorway should continue
thru the at grade intersection. None of us are saying that!
I'm really getting
On Sun, Dec 2, 2018 at 4:58 PM Thomas Silas wrote:
> As for the situation in question: I agree with the vast majority of the
> posters both in the changeset and in talk-us. There are countless examples
> of the motorway tag extending to the first intersection (or to a visible
> change in road
On Sun, Dec 2, 2018 at 4:30 PM Evin Fairchild wrote:
> Once again, I see you're misrepresenting the discussion and trying to make
> us look like a bunch of idiots for not accepting your way of doing things.
> There's no way you're so dense as to assume that because we pretty much all
> want the
On Sun, Dec 2, 2018 at 4:19 PM Adam Franco wrote:
> I'm not saying that the surface junction itself would still be motorway
> (or even the area of reduced speed approaching it), but once one is far
> enough beyond those limiting features and the speeds and other aspects are
> the same as the
Once again, I see you're misrepresenting the discussion and trying to make
us look like a bunch of idiots for not accepting your way of doing things.
There's no way you're so dense as to assume that because we pretty much all
want the motorway designation to extend all the way to the first at
I'm not saying that the surface junction itself would still be motorway (or
even the area of reduced speed approaching it), but once one is far enough
beyond those limiting features and the speeds and other aspects are the
same as the rest of the motorway, the roadway is functionally a motorway. I
Unsubscribe
On Wed, Nov 28, 2018, 6:18 PM Paul Johnson Can I get some voice of reason in
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/64919426? There seems to be
> quite a few people (and one AARoads forum troll egging it on) that are
> trying to propel the idea that motorways have at-grade
The commonly accepted definition of freeways in the US excludes surface
junctions, whereas expressways (trunks) does include intersections. I
honestly am surprised a group of roadgeeks isn't more attuned to this
distinction.
On Sun, Dec 2, 2018 at 3:15 PM Adam Franco wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 2,
On Sun, Dec 2, 2018 at 1:36 AM Paul Johnson wrote:
>
> On Sun, Dec 2, 2018 at 12:30 AM Bryan Housel wrote:
>
>> I do understand your point, but a dozen or so people on talk-us and the
>> six or so people on that changeset 64919426
>>
>
> Well, 1 person, an AA roads troll and like 5 sockpuppets.
The weekly round-up of OSM news, issue # 436,
is now available online in English, giving as always a summary of all things
happening in the openstreetmap world:
http://www.weeklyosm.eu/en/archives/11041/
Enjoy!
weeklyOSM?
who: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WeeklyOSM#Available_Languages
16 matches
Mail list logo
