On 02/21/2012 10:40 AM, Martijn van Exel wrote:
Here were the a2* mappings from the original import, fwiw:
This seems to have been taken from
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/TIGER_to_OSM_Attribute_Map
What annoys me about that page (a lot, actually) is that there is no
clarity as to
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 11:49 AM, Dave Hansen d...@sr71.net wrote:
On 02/21/2012 10:40 AM, Martijn van Exel wrote:
Here were the a2* mappings from the original import, fwiw:
This seems to have been taken from
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/TIGER_to_OSM_Attribute_Map
What annoys me
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 5:34 PM, Martijn van Exel m...@rtijn.org wrote:
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 1:33 PM, Metcalf, Calvin (DOT)
calvin.metc...@state.ma.us wrote:
The nice thing about ruby is that it's pretty easy to read with out actually
knowing much about ruby and the script that was
On 02/22/2012 10:05 AM, Martijn van Exel wrote:
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 11:49 AM, Dave Hansen d...@sr71.net wrote:
On 02/21/2012 10:40 AM, Martijn van Exel wrote:
Here were the a2* mappings from the original import, fwiw:
This seems to have been taken from
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 1:17 PM, Dave Hansen d...@sr71.net wrote:
On 02/13/2012 05:19 PM, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
It could just as easily be local mapping gone awry, by a local who
thinks only state highways should be primary. The TIGER import would not
have included any primaries, since there
]
Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2012 1:40 PM
To: Dave Hansen
Cc: Nathan Edgars II; talk-us@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Fresno has no primary roads
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 1:17 PM, Dave Hansen d...@sr71.net wrote:
On 02/13/2012 05:19 PM, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
It could just as easily
At 2012-02-21 10:40, Martijn van Exel wrote:
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 1:17 PM, Dave Hansen d...@sr71.net wrote:
On 02/13/2012 05:19 PM, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
It could just as easily be local mapping gone awry, by a local who
thinks only state highways should be primary. The TIGER import
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 3:26 PM, Alan Mintz
alan_mintz+...@earthlink.net wrote:
At 2012-02-21 10:40, Martijn van Exel wrote:
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 1:17 PM, Dave Hansen d...@sr71.net wrote:
On 02/13/2012 05:19 PM, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
It could just as easily be local mapping gone awry,
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 3:26 PM, Alan Mintz
alan_mintz+...@earthlink.net wrote:
At 2012-02-21 10:40, Martijn van Exel wrote:
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 1:17 PM, Dave Hansen d...@sr71.net wrote:
On 02/13/2012 05:19 PM, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
It could just as easily be local mapping gone awry,
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Martijn van Exel m...@rtijn.org wrote:
[..]
One more question before I start some minor cleanup on the TIGER
import pages[1] :
'Note: This was originally meant for 2006 data, but equally applies to
2005. There's a possibility that the TIGER import from 2007/2008
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 1:33 PM, Metcalf, Calvin (DOT)
calvin.metc...@state.ma.us wrote:
The nice thing about ruby is that it's pretty easy to read with out actually
knowing much about ruby and the script that was linked to (attached) seems to
be what's on that page meaning it looks to be
At 2012-02-13 15:21, you wrote:
I've never been to Fresno, but I can't believe there would not be a
single primary road there. Still, that is the Truth According To
OSM[1]
I find that most areas where there has been little manual editing of the
TIGER import will have roads that are generally
On 2/15/2012 4:09 AM, Alan Mintz wrote:
At 2012-02-13 15:21, you wrote:
I've never been to Fresno, but I can't believe there would not be a
single primary road there. Still, that is the Truth According To
OSM[1]
I find that most areas where there has been little manual editing of the
TIGER
On 2/14/2012 1:23 AM, Martijn van Exel wrote:
So only TIGER CFCC A2* were mapped to highway=primary in the import?
I guess that makes sense -- TIGER has a clear distinction between
primary (A2), secondary (A3) and local roads (A4). But in that
classification, where do the tertiary and trunk
Hi all,
I've never been to Fresno, but I can't believe there would not be a
single primary road there. Still, that is the Truth According To
OSM[1]
Who knows more about this situation? Are there any local mappers on
this list who can shed their light on this? Is this armchair mapping
gone awry?
On 2/13/2012 6:21 PM, Martijn van Exel wrote:
Hi all,
I've never been to Fresno, but I can't believe there would not be a
single primary road there. Still, that is the Truth According To
OSM[1]
Who knows more about this situation? Are there any local mappers on
this list who can shed their
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 7:19 PM, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2/13/2012 6:21 PM, Martijn van Exel wrote:
Hi all,
I've never been to Fresno, but I can't believe there would not be a
single primary road there. Still, that is the Truth According To
OSM[1]
Who knows more
17 matches
Mail list logo
