On Sun, Sep 2, 2018 at 6:29 PM Kevin Kenny wrote:
> Heh. Sometimes you have to wait a long time. The signage on 'Avenue of
> the Americas' in New York City has said that since the 1950's. The
> Postal Service prefers that name on street addresses. New Yorkers
> call it Sixth Avenue, which
On Sun, Sep 2, 2018 at 4:18 PM Nathan Mills wrote:
> My personal opinion is that if local practice and the USPS continue to use
> the old name, that name should stay in the name tag, while the Legislature's
> political name should be tagged as an alt_name. That said, there are
> situations in
The New Sapulpa Road situation is in practice a road with a secondary name.
Just like Flagler Street in part of Miami (FL, not OK) is defined by the state
legislature as being "Natan A Rok Boulevard" (or similar, working from memory
here).
My personal opinion is that if local practice and the
=
there are some roads in Massachusetts that have actual names and route numbers
(example: name="Grand Army of the Republic Highway"
ref="US 6"), but for reasons unknown there are street addresses like "3570
Route 6". Even though there is zero
On Sat, Sep 1, 2018 at 5:28 AM Greg Troxel wrote:
>
> From: Albert Pundt
> Subject: [Talk-us] Naming numbered roads as "State Route X", "Interstate
> X", etc.
> To: "talk-us@openstreetmap.org Openstreetmap" >
> Date: Fri, 31 Aug 20
From: Albert Pundt
Subject: [Talk-us] Naming numbered roads as "State Route X", "Interstate X",
etc.
To: "talk-us@openstreetmap.org Openstreetmap"
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2018 22:06:50 -0400 (10 hours, 17 minutes, 15 seconds ago)
Attachment: [3. text/html]..
Yeah, I agree, it is redundant and thus completely unnecessary to put the
highway number in the name tag. Have you informed SSR_317 about this
discussion?
On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 7:09 PM Albert Pundt wrote:
> I notice the user SSR_317 has been adding the route numbers of unnamed
> roads to
Yes, this is correct. name=* is only the name. Ideally, the ref=* tag
should be *supplemental* to a proper route relation at this point
(especially in Indiana, where I am aware of a *nine-way* concurrency,
something ref=* just doesn't handle very elegantly at all in even the
slightest stretch of
I notice the user SSR_317 has been adding the route numbers of unnamed
roads to the name=* tag of roads around Indianapolis. For example,
name=Interstate
465, name=US 31, name=State Route 37, etc. Isn't this practice frowned upon
as being redundant and not reflecting the lack of a proper name to
9 matches
Mail list logo
