2014-11-27 18:04 GMT+01:00 Brad Neuhauser brad.neuhau...@gmail.com:
Could you include the new node in the relation as role=label? That's at
least somewhat documented...
mapping labels is generally disputed, as a label is something the
dataconsumer creates to display information, it is not
Well, I think a a huge difference between the Hollywood Sign and Mount
Rushmore is Mount Rushmore is clearly a site dedicated to the monument.
The Hollywood Sign, IIRC, is on public property left flat save for the
sign, with no special status. Furthermore, the individual letters are
obviously
I'm willing to argue both cases. Having a role=label relation may be
useful where it may be otherwise ambiguous to properly form a cogent
label. However, in the Hollywood sign's case, just rendering each letter
as a label would be obvious to most people (albeit somewhat unusual) and
helpful
2014-11-26 18:30 GMT+01:00 Andrew Wiseman awise...@gmail.com:
That was me -- but I would argue it's an unusual way to tag it -- it's not
the individual letters that are important, it's the whole piece.
yes, that is clear, and the data in OSM also reflected this by having a
site relation to
Could you include the new node in the relation as role=label? That's at
least somewhat documented...
On Thursday, November 27, 2014, Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com
wrote:
2014-11-26 18:30 GMT+01:00 Andrew Wiseman awise...@gmail.com
2014-11-25 16:48 GMT+01:00 Andrew Wiseman awise...@gmail.com:
Interesting, but now it doesn't render. I saw it was gone and worried
somebody from that article took it off. Can we include a point in the
relation for it, so that it does render?
Someone has indeed done this. IMHO we shouldn't
That was me -- but I would argue it's an unusual way to tag it -- it's not
the individual letters that are important, it's the whole piece. You
wouldn't tag each president in Mount Rushmore and leave it at that, right?
To me the letters are secondary and to the whole. The FDR Memorial in DC is
the
The individual letter ways are currently tagged tourism=artwork. There's
an outstanding request to have the Standard stylesheet render such ways:
https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/855
In the meantime, would it be too much of a stretch to tag them
barrier=wall too?
2014-11-24 22:28 GMT+01:00 Andrew Wiseman awise...@gmail.com:
The trails mentioned in the article seem to be present in OSM, although
with the gates mentioned:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3202722073#map=16/34.1339/-118.3214
I have deleted this (recent) node, because the object was
Interesting, but now it doesn't render. I saw it was gone and worried
somebody from that article took it off. Can we include a point in the
relation for it, so that it does render?
Andrew
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 4:43 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com
wrote:
2014-11-24 22:28
Hi all, first time post here (hope I'm doing everything right.)
There's an interesting article at Gizmodo about erasing the Hollywood sign
from Google Maps, Bing Maps, Apple Maps etc -- people who live on roads
nearby were complaining about hikers and tourists, and they got the LA City
Council,
11 matches
Mail list logo
