Hi Serge,
I don't see a license related to this data, only a copyright notice on
the page. Is there a separate license somewhere that says this data is
usable?
Like the federal goverment, maps are considered part of the public record
in Mass, and therefor are in the public domain (no
Hi All,
I've been migrating the error calculation that feeds the current
MapRoulette challenge to new hardware, and that migration is now complete.
I have increased the error recalculation frequency to 4 hours, so the MR
data will be much fresher. The error calculation also now includes Canada
Hi Jason,
If the MassGIS building/address objects have MassGIS IDs are you planning
to preserve them in the OSM DB ?
Best,
On Sun, Dec 9, 2012 at 8:17 AM, Jason Remillard
remillard.ja...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi Serge,
I don't see a license related to this data, only a copyright notice on
the
Hi Jason -
Great to hear about the import. Sounds like some interesting data!
Have you taken a look through the import checklist at:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines?
I've recently made some updates would love to have you walk through those
steps to QA them.
Also - it looks
Hi Charlotte -
Welcome thanks for speaking up - I believe many new members share your
concerns those concerns should be addressed.
I'm glad to see you've signed up for the Welcome Working Group. I'm not
sure if the community is ready to implement your suggestions, as they are
big big big : ),
Jason Remillard remillard.ja...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Serge,
I don't see a license related to this data, only a copyright notice on
the page. Is there a separate license somewhere that says this data
is
usable?
Like the federal goverment, maps are considered part of the public
record
I was just looking at their tiles tonight and they've updated them to include
state shields!! Saw shields for PA, SC, MD, VA, WV, CA, and NY for starters.
Maybe now we should all agree to use the proper state abbreviation for the
ref tags on the ways instead of not having them at all
On Dec 9, 2012, at 7:37 PM, James Mast wrote:
I was just looking at their tiles tonight and they've updated them to include
state shields!! Saw shields for PA, SC, MD, VA, WV, CA, and NY for starters.
Maybe now we should all agree to use the proper state abbreviation for the
ref tags on
On Dec 9, 2012, at 8:12 PM, Michal Migurski wrote:
I was just looking at their tiles tonight and they've updated them to
include state shields!! Saw shields for PA, SC, MD, VA, WV, CA, and NY for
starters. Maybe now we should all agree to use the proper state
abbreviation for the ref
On Sun, Dec 9, 2012 at 9:37 PM, James Mast rickmastfa...@hotmail.com wrote:
I was just looking at their tiles tonight and they've updated them to
include state shields!! Saw shields for PA, SC, MD, VA, WV, CA, and NY for
starters. Maybe now we should all agree to use the proper state
On Dec 9, 2012, at 9:21 PM, Toby Murray wrote:
On Sun, Dec 9, 2012 at 9:37 PM, James Mast rickmastfa...@hotmail.com wrote:
I was just looking at their tiles tonight and they've updated them to
include state shields!! Saw shields for PA, SC, MD, VA, WV, CA, and NY for
starters. Maybe now we
Hi John,
I am not signing up for the import! I might have time next summer, but not
right now.
But, in general, I don't think the MassGIS ID's should be included since
they are just the center of mass of the buildings, and there is no
indication that they will be preserving them as they update
I've run into a bit of a wrinkle plotting the routes of the Alaska Marine
Highway System. The street data for Wrangell, AK seems to have been horribly
mangled.
- David E. Nelson___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
On Sun, Dec 9, 2012 at 8:59 PM, David E. Nelson denelso...@yahoo.ca wrote:
I've run into a bit of a wrinkle plotting the routes of the Alaska Marine
Highway System. The street data for Wrangell, AK seems to have been
horribly mangled.
When pointing out a place on the mailing lists, it is
Hi all,
Let me bump this topic - the Welcome Working Group as originally
proposed and kicked off by Richard Weait (proposal here[1], initial
meeting IRC log here[2]) will meet again this coming week.
Welcome Working Group? Yes. In very broad strokes, this WG will look
at how we can do a better
15 matches
Mail list logo