While I don't have "a dog in this fight," I also read our wiki which says "Link
roads NORMALLY do not have names." (Emphasis mine). In the unusual
(abnormal?) cases where they do (and I trust Paul wouldn't have added them
unless they do), there is no contradiction with our wiki, rather an unus
There are some cases where naming link roads makes sense. For example, I
tag the roads coming out of roundabouts as link roads (especially if it's
something like a residential road intersecting, a note important road like
a secondary road, and I tag the slip roads for that leg of the roundabout
as
This summarizes the approach I take towards this in regards to named or
reffed links.
At least until we start consistently expecting tags on entities to apply to
those entities instead of a completely different entity. Adding ref to
ways instead of the relation that describes the route is redunda
3 matches
Mail list logo