Re: [Talk-us] Proposal: Sunset ref=* on ways in, favor of relations

On Sat, Nov 7, 2015 at 12:18 PM, Kevin Kenny wrote: > On 11/06/2015 05:48 PM, Richard Welty wrote: > >> Stop rendering this key and instead render the relations > >> > > >> >Is there*any* map style that does this at the moment? > >> > > >I believe

Re: [Talk-us] Proposal: Sunset ref=* on ways in, favor of relations

On Sun, Nov 8, 2015 at 8:04 PM, Paul Norman wrote: > On 11/7/2015 10:18 AM, Kevin Kenny wrote: > >> I find lately that it needs a patched Mapnik, because Mapnik (sensibly) >> went to a read-only database connection, and one of Phil's stored >> procedures modifies the database

[Talk-us] Data sources (Was: Proposal: Sunset ref=* on ways in, favor of relations)

On 11/11/2015 06:53 AM, Paul Johnson wrote: I have Phil's code adapted to my own use, and going at https://kbk.is-a-geek.net/catskills/test3.html?la=41.3476=-74.6686=11 (that particular spot shows Interstate, US Highway, NY, NJ, PA and county shields.) Wow, that's a

Re: [Talk-us] Proposal: Sunset ref=* on ways in, favor of relations

On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 9:07 AM, Richard Welty wrote: > > there's a chicken and egg problem here. you need mappers to work to fix > up route relations but it's hard to get motivated unless something visibly > happens with them. > Agreed. I'm aggressively trying to ensure

Re: [Talk-us] Proposal: Sunset ref=* on ways in, favor of relations

On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 7:31 AM, Richard Welty wrote: > On 11/11/15 7:31 AM, Paul Johnson wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 9:07 AM, Richard Welty > > wrote: > > > > 3) make the needs/requirements for growing

Re: [Talk-us] Proposal: Sunset ref=* on ways in, favor of relations

On 11/11/15 8:49 AM, Paul Johnson wrote: > > County and city routes might be a tough nut to crack. The two Tulsa > City Expressways use fairly generic (and in the old pre-carto > rendering, coincidentally approximated) official signage. > so produce a generic looking svg file for the particular

Re: [Talk-us] Proposal: Sunset ref=* on ways in, favor of relations

On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 7:55 AM, Richard Welty wrote: > On 11/11/15 8:49 AM, Paul Johnson wrote: > > > > County and city routes might be a tough nut to crack. The two Tulsa > > City Expressways use fairly generic (and in the old pre-carto > > rendering, coincidentally

Re: [Talk-us] Proposal: Sunset ref=* on ways in, favor of relations

On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 9:32 AM, Richard Fairhurst wrote: > I use Interstate route relations as a > small part of cycle.travel's routing algorithm, for example. "Anything" > is a > big word! > You might want to add this to the OSM wiki's page regarding route relations, as

Re: [Talk-us] Proposal: Sunset ref=* on ways in, favor of relations

On 11/11/15 7:31 AM, Paul Johnson wrote: > On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 9:07 AM, Richard Welty > wrote: > > 3) make the needs/requirements for growing out the shield rendering > well known to the community. issues that require some care

Re: [Talk-us] San Diego Address Import Update

Tod Fitch writes: You raise a lot of really excellent and difficult points and I am not commenting on most of them. > Finally, Los Angeles. The incorporated area for LA is huge and it > surrounds other incorporated cities. But there are areas in LA like > Woodland Hills,

Re: [Talk-us] Fix missing and wrong oneway ways

Martijn, When I attempt to install the JOSM plug in it get "Downloading the following plugin has *failed*: - trafficFlowDirection" JOSM / Java version information: Version 8964 Java Version 1.8.0_65 Any ideas? Thanks, Mike On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 3:09 PM, Martijn van Exel

Re: [Talk-us] Fix missing and wrong oneway ways

No, not offhand, but let me forward this to my team so they may look into it. Can they email you with follow up questions? On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 11:38 AM Mike Thompson wrote: > Martijn, > > When I attempt to install the JOSM plug in it get "Downloading the > following

Re: [Talk-us] Fix missing and wrong oneway ways

Martijn, Thanks for the quick reply. Certainly they may contact me with questions. I also upgraded to the latest stable version of JOSM, but still receive the same result. Mike On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 12:08 PM, Martijn van Exel wrote: > No, not offhand, but let me forward

Re: [Talk-us] Proposal: Sunset ref=* on ways in, favor of relations

On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 7:55 AM, Richard Welty <rwe...@averillpark.net> wrote: and for unsigned routes, either don't create the relation, or create a relation and use unsigned_ref instead of ref And Paul Johnson replied I'm a proponent of