On 8/15/2017 10:23 AM, OSM Volunteer stevea wrote:
1) Of a geographic value such that they positively further the goals and hew
to the tenets of the project,
2) Current or recent, not of a vintage that even as entered do not fully
reflect on-the-ground reality right now,
3) Especially if imp
A natural conclusion is to improve in place. I like the way Steve says natural
edges to split, as that might become where somebody in the future falls off at
that edge with data in a better place, improving our map. Post FMMP can get
chewy ooy gooey, don't I know it. Sometimes a chunk is wort
It might go without saying for most OSM contributors, however, it is time to
say out loud: data which make their way into OSM must be
1) Of a geographic value such that they positively further the goals and hew
to the tenets of the project,
2) Current or recent, not of a vintage that even as
Definitely a pain. It took me a long time to alter (I hope improve) the land
cover around the Morgan trailhead and San Mateo peak. Trails, etc. were easy to
do from my Garmin tracks and satellite imagery but working with the existing
land use/cover was so frustrating I nearly decided not to touc
The challenge with the Scrub from Hell is that it’s mostly one huge area
(role=outer in 8 segments) and 40 or something role=inner that provide
“cutouts” for things other than natural=scrub; this could be a lake or it
could be a city or whatever. This is the largest single object I’ve ever had
5 matches
Mail list logo
