On Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 11:56 AM Doug Peterson <
dougpeter...@dpeters2.dyndns.org> wrote:
> It's my fault for not zooming in more. I did not see it at all when I
> downloaded that area in JOSM. I sent a note to tyndale about that. I
> understand that there is a direction towards using boundary to
It's my fault for not zooming in more. I did not see it at all when I
downloaded that area in JOSM. I sent a note to tyndale about that. I understand
that there is a direction towards using boundary to replace state and county
use of leisure=park. I have seen plenty of expections to those
As an ID editor user I thought of an improvement to it overnight wrt Tiger
data. I submitted a feature request. Just thought that something like this
might be useful within other editors too (if your workflow is like mine). I
was inspired by the Tiger reviewed=no discussion and my desire to tame
I believe this is the park
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/549549501#map=14/41.9987/-86.5489.
Looking at the history, I see when you created it. It was changed to
boundary=park by user tyndale on changeset
openstreetmap.org/changeset/86836794
I don't believe boundary=state_park is appropriate.
I have noticed that a state park has disappeared in Michigan. It is one that I
had worked on. Many years ago I had used a tool to find changesets that
affected a particular area but don't seem to be able to find something like
that in my bookmarks or searching. I could put the boundaries back
5 matches
Mail list logo
