-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Friday, September 18, 2020 1:53 PM, stevea wrote:
> There are at least four new national bicycle routes "pending" in the USBRS!
> (Ballots by state Departments of Transportation before AASHTO's Autumn 2020
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
For the last few months, I've been seeing "Future I-87" signs along portions of
US-64 and US-17 in North Carolina. I-87[0] exists on a section of highway near
Raleigh, NC, and will eventually extend to Norfolk, VA.
Should I start a relation for
Tropical Storm Isaias left several homes in my neighborhood severely damaged
and condemned. Is there a proper way to map these structures?
Thanks,
Eric
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Tuesday, July 14, 2020 10:15 AM, Matthew Woehlke
wrote:
> The (possible) problem with having access implied by service=driveway is
> that a lot of access roads to stores/businesses/offices are also
>
Sure, I get that. The flip side is that it is likely to get confusing what is
open and when with all the changes occurring. It would be good to have a
resource to help people determine where they can go if they need something.
Eric
Original Message
On Mar 19, 2020, 10:06,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Sorry for the late entry to the discussion but I did have a little information
to add here.
Wilderness, at least at the federal level, enjoys a different protection from
that of a national forest. There is to be no development or tree harvesting
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Thursday, December 19, 2019 2:19 PM, Martijn van Exel wrote:
> I actually like your suggestion that highway=trunk does not add much value to
> the U.S. map, Eric.
> We love to add detail / granularity to OSM so
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Monday, December 16, 2019 8:21 PM, Anthony Costanzo
wrote:
> Given how these and other major
> single-carriageway roads in northern and western Canada are tagged as
> Trunk, tagging AK 2 as such would seem to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Monday, December 16, 2019 7:35 PM, Tod Fitch wrote:
> My reading of the wiki indicates that for the United States a trunk is “a
> high speed Arterial Divided highway that is partially grade separated.” [1]
>
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
I've noticed that there is some mixed tagging of the Alaska Highway AK-2 from
the Canadian border through Delta Junction to where it becomes a divided
highway just south and east of Fairbanks at Eielson Air Force Base. Some of
the non-divided
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Monday, September 9, 2019 11:20 AM, Mateusz Konieczny
wrote:
> I would also remove route=ferry tag.
>
> I assume here that "temporary" means
> "closed for at least week or two",
> with closer closure I have
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Thursday, June 27, 2019 7:58 AM, Simon Poole wrote:
> The answer the OP was looking for is likely https://www.gnssplanning.com/
Thank you!!! My Google-fu has been failing me lately.
Eric
-BEGIN PGP
I use GPSr devices other than what's in my smartphone. The point is that if
all the satellites are clustered directly overhead the diversity isn't great
enough to give a truly accurate position on the ground. For best surveying
with a GPSr, you want satellites to not only be overhead but
I was told there was a website that forecasted the best times to do survey work
with GNSS based upon diversity of satellites in the sky, solar activity, etc.
Does anyone know what site this is?
Thanks,
Eric___
Talk-us mailing list
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Wednesday, March 20, 2019 6:38 PM, Frederik Ramm wrote:
> Should all roads inside the gated community be access=private?
I wouldn't necessarily mark all the roads as private as I think that would
hinder the
I can do it. Sounds right up my alley...
Eric "Sparks"
Original Message
On Feb 6, 2019, 02:56, Frederik Ramm wrote:
> Hi,
>
> DWG has received a message from someone at the "Pine Mountain Trail
> Association Board", pointing out several mis-named trails and offering
> to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Thursday, November 29, 2018 3:13 PM, Kevin Broderick
wrote:
> Doesn't the Forest Service use FR for "Forest Road" at the reference? I'd
> think that, or NFR to distinguish from state forest roads, would be the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Wednesday, November 28, 2018 9:49 AM, Martijn van Exel
wrote:
> I think you are right. It would be good if we can arrive at a common
> prefix and document it on the wiki. 'FS' makes sense. Perhaps even a new
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
For the past few weeks I've not been able to get the Maryland Six-Inch imagery
to work in JOSM. Last night I opened a ticket with MD iMAP and have found a
fix. Not sure how to get this propagated into JOSM but here's the fix for
anyone that is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
I just noticed that three days ago "Derek Shorter"[0] decided to make it a lot
easier to get around my little town (Chesapeake Beach, MD)[1] by adding several
roadways as well as adding a bridge across the Chesapeake Bay. I checked and
it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
I've added all Virginia hurricane evacuation routes[0]. Still working on North
Carolina and I'm looking for a source for Maryland. Perhaps I should be
looking for South Carolina sooner...
[0] https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/BKj
Sparks
-BEGIN
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
-‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On September 6, 2018 9:51 AM, James Umbanhowar wrote:
> Would this fit the route relation model better if we used the following
> tagging scheme
>
> route:road
> network:MD:hurricane
>
> or something similar?
When
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On September 6, 2018 6:38 AM, Rihards wrote:
> That page says "Cycle routes or bicycle route are named or numbered or
> otherwise signed routes. May go along roads, trails or dedicated cycle
> paths."
>
> Is that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On September 5, 2018 7:24 PM, Kevin Kenny wrote:
> Are you tagging the routes consistently with role=forward or
> role=reverse? An evacuation route is essentially a one-way item
> (presumably, return after the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
I recently finished an update to the evacuation routes feature[0], turning it
into a relation (route). I'll be working on adding hurricane evacuation routes
to areas I'm familiar with (Maryland, Hampton Roads area of Virginia, and
Northeast
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Greetings,
A couple of weeks ago I reached out to many of the OSM account holders that are
in my area hoping they would be interested in creating a local community for
mapping southern Maryland. I found a few victims and so we're pressing on!
I'm
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 12:56:29PM -0700, stevea wrote:
Especially if you are a railfan in California, please have a look. Or, if
you are a rail enthusiast in another state, and want a template with which
to jump-start better OSM rail completion
On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 06:30:37PM +, Harald Kliems wrote:
I think I figured it out. It's the no-U-turn relations (4286903 and
4286904). Instead of having the same way as from and to, they reference
a segment further down the road as their to. Probably that was caused by
someone splitting
On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 10:52:23AM -0500, Richard Welty wrote:
On 1/30/15 10:45 AM, Eric Christensen wrote:
I'm having a problem that I can't seem to figure out. At Node 2899149410
(http://osm.org/go/ZZeAdq4EI--?m=) I get an error in JOSM that says The
to way does not start or end at a via
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 08:41:31AM -0500, Richard Welty wrote:
not sure how to tag this one. Inde Motorsports Ranch is
near Willcox, AZ, a multi configuration road course complex, plus
the straight away on the south edge of the complex doubles as
Steve,
Thanks for sparking my interest here. I had started working on some rail
segments around my home town of Plymouth, NC, but after reading your original
message I went back and completed those and verified other segments along the
branch including those around the state port in Morehead
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Mon, Oct 06, 2014 at 09:33:08AM -0700, Peter Dobratz wrote:
After checking a few of the objects, it looks like this change removed
shop=copyshop and added amenity=post_office. I don't necessarily
disagree with this change. In my mind I had
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 04:53:57PM +0200, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2014-07-14 19:38 GMT+02:00 Eric H. Christensen e...@christensenplace.us:
I've not figured out the proper way to map a launch pad.
the whole complex could get some spaceport tag, e.g. man_made=spaceport
or aeroway=spaceport
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 06:25:58PM +0200, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2014-07-15 18:01 GMT+02:00 Eric H. Christensen e...@christensenplace.us:
The launch_pad could be tagged aeroway=launch_pad
There seem to be 7 aeroway=launchpad
I've been cleaning up the NASA Wallops Island facility roadways and buildings.
There has been a lot of construction there over the past few years. With that
said, I've not figured out the proper way to map a launch pad. We've got
plenty of aeronautical tags (runways, aprons, etc) but none
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Tue, Jun 03, 2014 at 08:54:09PM -0400, Eric H. Christensen wrote:
If there are no other objections or input (I haven't heard any new input
since last Friday) then I'll start uploading these polygons (manually using
JOSM) later this weekend
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 10:12:02PM -0400, Eric H. Christensen wrote:
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 05:17:59PM -0800, Paul Norman wrote:
You'll need to develop a translation for the shapefiles that converts
shapefile attributes to OSM tags, for use
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 12:52:30AM -0700, Gregory Arenius wrote:
I wouldn't import the data per say, as in uploading the .osm file you
have. I would download the current OSM data for the area covered. Then,
in the import file I would check
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 05:17:59PM -0800, Paul Norman wrote:
You'll need to develop a translation for the shapefiles that converts
shapefile attributes to OSM tags, for use with ogr2osm or shp2osm.jar.
This is moderately technical.
I used JOSM
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 06:43:31PM -0400, Dale Puch wrote:
Personally, I like to treat most sidewalks that are close to and basically
parallel the same as attached ones. IE. both of Martijn's examples tagged
as part of the roadway way. I would save the separate footpath highways
for when it
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 05:17:59PM -0800, Paul Norman wrote:
I'm also investigating house/building numbers to properly address the
county as well.
I would suggest handling the building outlines separately, and at the
least waiting until you know if you'll be getting addresses before
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 09:42:36PM -0500, Richard Welty wrote:
On 12/15/13 9:23 PM, Eric H. Christensen wrote:
On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 07:36:40PM -0500, Richard Welty wrote:
3) you can use a way as a via, not just a node.
Not sure
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
I've been searching for some documentation to explain an intersection that has
several turn restrictions that need to be mapped for routing to work properly.
The intersection in question is where Riva Road intersects with West Street[0].
Traffic
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 07:36:40PM -0500, Richard Welty wrote:
On 12/15/13 3:27 PM, Eric H. Christensen wrote:
I've been searching for some documentation to explain an intersection
that has several turn restrictions that need to be mapped
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 02:23:52PM -0500, Phil! Gold wrote:
* Eric H. Christensen e...@christensenplace.us [2012-12-11 21:24 -0500]:
Is there a good way to make the PGS-sourced data match the Tiger data in
certain areas to improve the accuracy?
If you use JOSM, the ContourMerge plugin
?
If you'd like to see what I'm talking about take a look at the area around
N38.7773972 W76.543262.
Thanks.
-- Eric
--
Eric H Christensene...@christensenplace.us
Sparks spa...@fedoraproject.org
46 matches
Mail list logo
