Jeff,
On 12/11/12 08:48, Jeff Meyer wrote:
Frederik - one question I have about changeset tags and things like
correspondence tables - how easy will it be for people to discover that
this data even exists? How will they know to look for it? Will they need
to be software developers? For example,
Hi,
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 5:45 PM, Alex Barth a...@mapbox.com wrote:
+1 for importing this. I'm curious for a battle plan of whoever leads this
effort, this will be a lot of work.
I think the plan should be to give the local mappers some time hand merge
the data in, record what towns
On 11 December 2012 03:46, Jason Remillard remillard.ja...@gmail.com wrote:
I think the plan should be to give the local mappers some time hand merge
the data in, record what towns were done by hand, then import rest of the
data with a script (or coarse not putting buildings over buildings).
+1 for importing this. I'm curious for a battle plan of whoever leads this
effort, this will be a lot of work.
Re: license, I've heard personally from MassGIS director Christian Jacqz that
all of Mass' GIS data is public domain based on the state's open policy on
public records. I think this
From: Alex Barth [mailto:a...@mapbox.com]
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] MassGIS building conversion
On Dec 9, 2012, at 3:51 PM, Jason Remillard remillard.ja...@gmail.com
wrote:
But, in general, I don't think the MassGIS ID's should be included
since they are just the center of mass
Hi Paul -
On Dec 10, 2012, at 6:06 PM, Paul Norman penor...@mac.com wrote:
Any future work with the data after it's imported will have to handle
buildings without IDs. I included IDs in two of my imports and have found
them useless. I think that without a clear plan to use them (i.e. one
I would highly encourage retaining them. (of course! : ) )
Unless there's another plan for retaining some association, it could be
very helpful in the future for referencing between OSM and MassGIS records.
And... maybe there's other information in the Mass records that an OSMer
might want to
From: Alex Barth [mailto:a...@mapbox.com]
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] MassGIS building conversion
Hi Paul -
On Dec 10, 2012, at 6:06 PM, Paul Norman penor...@mac.com wrote:
Any future work with the data after it's imported will have to handle
buildings without IDs. I included IDs in two
Hi,
On 12/11/2012 01:04 AM, Paul Norman wrote:
Lots of people include IDs because they think they might be useful but very
seldom are they actually used.
I can second that. I have witnessed many imports painstakingly
preserving the ID (because, after all, most of us are IT people and our
Frederik - one question I have about changeset tags and things like
correspondence tables - how easy will it be for people to discover that
this data even exists? How will they know to look for it? Will they need to
be software developers? For example, will a GIS expert from the state of
Hi Serge,
I don't see a license related to this data, only a copyright notice on
the page. Is there a separate license somewhere that says this data is
usable?
Like the federal goverment, maps are considered part of the public record
in Mass, and therefor are in the public domain (no
Hi Jason,
If the MassGIS building/address objects have MassGIS IDs are you planning
to preserve them in the OSM DB ?
Best,
On Sun, Dec 9, 2012 at 8:17 AM, Jason Remillard
remillard.ja...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi Serge,
I don't see a license related to this data, only a copyright notice on
the
Hi Jason -
Great to hear about the import. Sounds like some interesting data!
Have you taken a look through the import checklist at:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines?
I've recently made some updates would love to have you walk through those
steps to QA them.
Also - it looks
Jason Remillard remillard.ja...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Serge,
I don't see a license related to this data, only a copyright notice on
the page. Is there a separate license somewhere that says this data
is
usable?
Like the federal goverment, maps are considered part of the public
record
Hi John,
I am not signing up for the import! I might have time next summer, but not
right now.
But, in general, I don't think the MassGIS ID's should be included since
they are just the center of mass of the buildings, and there is no
indication that they will be preserving them as they update
Hello Everybody,
Last week the Massachusetts mapping department (MassGIS) released data for
all of the buildings in the state.
http://www.mass.gov/anf/research-and-tech/it-serv-and-support/application-serv/office-of-geographic-information-massgis/datalayers/structures.html
Since it is likely
On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 10:50 PM, Jason Remillard
remillard.ja...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Everybody,
Hi Jason!
Last week the Massachusetts mapping department (MassGIS) released data for
all of the buildings in the state.
17 matches
Mail list logo