I'm not a crypto expert. (Hugh?)
Most of the crates seem like they are either rust connectors to other
systems (like OpenSSL) or use https://github.com/briansmith/ring (which
follows BoringSSL, which is Google's fork of OpenSSL). On the other hand,
the links suggests that ring is currently failing
On 2018-02-03 10:28 AM, David Mason via talk wrote:
> I'd also comment on Rust being an interesting competitor to Go.
>
> Rust has better performance, complete statically determined safety
> (enforced by the type system), no garbage collection, minimal runtime, and
> an active group targeting WebA
I'd also comment on Rust being an interesting competitor to Go.
Rust has better performance, complete statically determined safety
(enforced by the type system), no garbage collection, minimal runtime, and
an active group targeting WebAssembly (i.e. very high performance browser
programs). It's wh
On 2 February 2018 at 16:35, William Park via talk wrote:
> You should be comparing Swift (iOS) with Ketlin (Android). I'm leaning
> towards Ketlin, just I can't afford Apple. We'll see what Google will
> do with Go.
Seems to me that these represent somewhat different courses...
Swift and Ketl
You should be comparing Swift (iOS) with Ketlin (Android). I'm leaning
towards Ketlin, just I can't afford Apple. We'll see what Google will
do with Go.
--
William Park
On Fri, Feb 02, 2018 at 12:14:04PM -0500, D. Hugh Redelmeier via talk wrote:
> | From: David Collier-Brown via talk
> |
> |
On 02/02/18 13:16, Myles Braithwaite 👾 via talk wrote:
> On 2018-02-02 09:14, David Collier-Brown via talk wrote:
>> Later this month I'm joining a company that is fairly Go-intensive.
>> They originally prototyped in Perl, but over time needed more
>> performance but not to the level that would re
On 2018-02-02 09:14, David Collier-Brown via talk wrote:
Later this month I'm joining a company that is fairly Go-intensive.
They originally prototyped in Perl, but over time needed more
performance but not to the level that would require assembler or even
C.
What else have folks observed?
I'v
| From: David Collier-Brown via talk
|
| Later this month I'm joining a company that is fairly Go-intensive. They
| originally prototyped in Perl, but over time needed more performance but not
| to the level that would require assembler or even C.
|
| What else have folks observed?
I'm sitting
On Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 9:14 AM, David Collier-Brown via talk <
talk@gtalug.org> wrote:
> Later this month I'm joining a company that is fairly Go-intensive. They
> originally prototyped in Perl, but over time needed more performance but
> not to the level that would require assembler or even C.
>
Go is becoming more and more common in the SysAdmin/SRE tools world.
Kubernetes, GH-OST, and as mentioned by Lennart, many of the other docker
tools are all in Go. It looks like a language that's going to be around
for a while.
On Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 11:06 AM, Lennart Sorensen via talk
wrote:
On Fri, Feb 02, 2018 at 09:14:24AM -0500, David Collier-Brown via talk wrote:
> Later this month I'm joining a company that is fairly Go-intensive. They
> originally prototyped in Perl, but over time needed more performance but not
> to the level that would require assembler or even C.
>
> What e
Later this month I'm joining a company that is fairly Go-intensive.Â
They originally prototyped in Perl, but over time needed more
performance but not to the level that would require assembler or even C.
What else have folks observed?
--dave
--
David Collier-Brown, | Always do right.
12 matches
Mail list logo