There's a bot in Poland that comments on changesets which break addresses
(e.g. combining addr:place with addr:street), along with an explanation and
links to forum topic.
What do you think about it? Are such bots useful or not?
Michał
___
talk mailing
2018-04-04 10:44 GMT+02:00 Michał Brzozowski :
> There's a bot in Poland that comments on changesets which break addresses
> (e.g. combining addr:place with addr:street), along with an explanation and
> links to forum topic.
> What do you think about it? Are such bots useful or not?
>
while the
On 3/31/2018 5:25 AM, Bryan Housel wrote:
a `.geojson` file to describe where the region where it is active.
(multiple resources can share a .geojson file)
I'm having trouble figuring out what a sensible region is for the
meetups in Vancouver and the Pacific Northwest.
Our meetups are along
Hi Michał,
I can see value in making sure that mistakes are not accidentally introduced.
However, I am not sure whether a bot like you describe is a wanted solution.
* I have concerns about false positives, when the bot considers an action
as braking a connection and gives comment while the
I think the more we can do to automate QA, the better.
There should be some common sense guidelines for running bots though:
* user names with “bot” in them
* user profiles that say what the bot does and where the source code is
* common place on GitHub for bot development (osmlab/bots?)
Hi,
On 04/04/18 10:44, Michał Brzozowski wrote:
> What do you think about it? Are such bots useful or not?
The bot programmer must take extreme care not to make their bot an
annoyance. In my opinion this would include:
* do not message the same person twice about the same kind of problem
* at t
> * do not message the same person twice about the same kind of problem
and I would support this. The other problem is how recent was the
mapping. If its more than a week old they may have corrected the way they
work after it had been brought to their attention by another mapper.
Cheerio John
Paul,
For this application having a well defined region isn't a big issue. To me
it's more of "if you are interested, here is a nearby OSM group(s)." I
think as we learn how users react to the feature, we can find ways to
improve it. To that end, I gave Metro Vancouver as an area to github
issue.
Yep, to echo what Clifford said - we don’t need to get the exact boundaries
perfect. As long as a person editing around this area sees that there is
something nearby, I am happy.
Because the project is really just a bunch of .geojson files, we can be
flexible and update as often as needed.
F
Hi,
I think we need a place to discuss maps rendering using OSM data, so I
created special subforum to talk about it:
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=100
--
"My method is uncertain/ It's a mess but it's working" [F. Apple]
___
talk
10 matches
Mail list logo
