Re: [Talk-it] Quesito stabile nuovo da mappare

Ivo Reano wrote > Martin, e tutti gli altri. > Ma avete perso di vista la richiesta originale? > Il "Gruppo Mòcheni 3.0" chiedeva lumi dai luminari sul modo corretto di > mappare edifici. Non una incredibilmente lunga discussione sulla taggatura > di poi e civici! > Santa pazienza, se quei ragazzi

Re: [Talk-it] Quesito stabile nuovo da mappare

Stiamo facendo altro OT! Il titolo è : [Talk-it] Quesito stabile nuovo da mappare ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it

[OSM-talk] International Day of the World's Indigenous Peoples

The International Day of the World’s Indigenous Peoples is 9 August. This day recognizes the achievements and contributions of the world's 370 million indigenous people who live in more than 90 countries.  I wish to join the world in honouring and acknowledging the resilience, dignity

Re: [OSM-talk-be] folk sports in Belgium

You're right. Done. Op wo 7 aug. 2019 om 00:53 schreef Lionel Giard : > At the moment the OSM wiki page for sport=pelota only show the description > of the "pelote basque " : > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Asport%3Dpelota . Maybe we >

Re: [Talk-it] Quesito stabile nuovo da mappare

Allora, secondo netiquette, si deve aprire un nuovo thread. Lo dico per chi segue da poco la ML. I vecchi dovrebbero saperlo. Il giorno gio 8 ago 2019 alle ore 16:01 Martin Koppenhoefer < dieterdre...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > > > sent from a phone > > On 8. Aug 2019, at 15:36, Ivo Reano wrote:

Re: [OSM-talk] Survey on global and local communities in OpenStreetMap

Hi, On 08.08.19 00:52, Christoph Hormann wrote: > By speaking directly and publishing my responses i risk being challenged > and criticized personally. While i don't mind this there are > definitely a lot of people who don't want or can't do this. And many > of them probably would not mind

Re: [OSM-talk] Survey on global and local communities in OpenStreetMap

On Thursday 08 August 2019, Mikel Maron wrote: > > My main concern is rather that there are a lot of free form > > questions yet there is no option for the participants to allow > > publication of the individual free form answers in anonymized > > form.  > > Select “publicly aggregated and

[OSM-talk-be] Ways with identical coordinates on top of each other

Hello, I recently came across a parking building with multiple floors in OSM, in which ways are tagged with 'level' and 'layer' tags. It struck me that there are ways that have the very same geometry on different levels (see links below). As a result, the map has four arrows (one for each

Re: [Talk-it] Quesito stabile nuovo da mappare

On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 11:20 PM totera wrote: > > Nelle delibere comunali poi quando si fa riferimento a un edificio si parla > di "edificio sito al civico 17 di via Tal de' Tali" anziché di "edificio a > cui si accede dal civico 17 di via Tal de' Tali". Di solito si parla di edificio con

Re: [OSM-talk] Survey on global and local communities in OpenStreetMap

On Thursday 08 August 2019, Frederik Ramm wrote: > > By speaking directly and publishing my responses i risk being > > challenged and criticized personally. While i don't mind this > > there are definitely a lot of people who don't want or can't do > > this. And many of them probably would not

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Tr : Vhello - New Cycle Nodes Network / Nouveau réseau Points-Noeuds Vélo / Niew Fietsknooppunten

Hello, Le 08.08.19 à 14:05, corentin.marec...@hainaut.be a écrit : > we translated in french the following page: > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cycle_Node_Network_Tagging > How can I add it for the community ? clic on "Toutes les langues", and "Français", save your translation there,

[OSM-talk-be] Tr : Vhello - New Cycle Nodes Network / Nouveau réseau Points-Noeuds Vélo / Niew Fietsknooppunten

Hey ! We recently created a new cycle nodes Network in the Region of the Heart of Hainaut (Mons / La Lovuière). We would like to import it in openstreetmap / opencyclemap. Find enclosed the shape files with the data: - Nodes:

Re: [Talk-it] Quesito stabile nuovo da mappare

sent from a phone > On 8. Aug 2019, at 12:21, Federico Cortese wrote: > > Queste difformità sono dovute a situazioni precedenti alla normativa > ISTAT che è abbastanza recente ed è stata scritta proprio per > risolvere questi problemi e creare uniformità. „recente“ per i tempi della PA?

Re: [Talk-it] Quesito stabile nuovo da mappare

sent from a phone > On 8. Aug 2019, at 15:36, Ivo Reano wrote: > > Non una incredibilmente lunga discussione sulla taggatura di poi e civici! > Santa pazienza, se quei ragazzi seguono ancora il thread sono dei santi! è vero che non ci rivolgiamo più soprattutto ai ragazzi e siamo invece

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Ways with identical coordinates on top of each other

I assume OSM always has been a 2.5D map. I'm thinking about tunnels and bridges. To properly map them, we always needed the level tag. So any data consumer that creates a road network from OSM will need to have knowledge about the level tag. Of course, the example that you mention, of indoor

Re: [Talk-it] Quesito stabile nuovo da mappare

Martin, e tutti gli altri. Ma avete perso di vista la richiesta originale? Il "Gruppo Mòcheni 3.0" chiedeva lumi dai luminari sul modo corretto di mappare edifici. Non una incredibilmente lunga discussione sulla taggatura di poi e civici! Santa pazienza, se quei ragazzi seguono ancora il thread

Re: [talk-au] [FOSS4G-Oceania] GHG mitigation and FOSS4G SotM Oceania

Great work Adam! I agree this looks like a worthwhile program. On Thu, 8 Aug 2019 at 09:45, Edoardo Neerhut wrote: > Fantastic work on this Adam. Parks Victoria would be a wonderful > organisation to fund offset with. Much better than a Cayman Island > registered organisation with plantations

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Manque d'attribution : je suis estomaquée

Salut, Mais qui donc est dans une bulle ? Attention, être dans ou hors d"une bulle ne donne pas raison. Je rejoins @marc_marc sur le fait qu'il faut être courtois et compréhensif. Il ne faut pas développer une méthode pour les "coupables" que l'on appliquerait aux "innocents" qui sont

Re: [Talk-de] Frage zum tagging Rettungsbaken

Hallo Michael, > In OpenSeaMap werden sie korrekt angezeigt... :-/ :-) Richtig eingetragen werden die Rettungplattformen (seemännisch "Bake") ab z=14 angezeigt, ab z=15 mit amtlichem Namen [1] Wattwandern wird nur mit Führer empfohlen. Auch OpenSeaMap ist nur eine Orientierungshilfe. (denn zu

[Talk-de] Frage zum tagging Rettungsbaken

Hallo zusammen! Von mir lest Ihr kaum, weil ich meist nicht qualifiziert genug bin an der Diskussion teilzunehmen aber ich lese hier regelmäßig mit und versuche auch das eine oder andere umzusetzen, wenn es micht betrifft. ;-) Nun habe ich aber etwas, bei dem ich gerne Eure Meinung hätte. Ich

Re: [Talk-de] Frage zum tagging Rettungsbaken

Hallo Markus! OpenSeaMap nutze ich eigentlich nie, weshalb OSM für mich immer OpenStreetMap ist. *rotwerd* In OpenSeaMap werden sie korrekt angezeigt... :-/ OpenSeaMap: CUX: http://map.openseamap.org/?zoom=15=53.90650=8.64157=BFTFFFTFFTF0FF Openstreetmap:

Re: [talk-au] [FOSS4G-Oceania] GHG mitigation and FOSS4G SotM Oceania

Fantastic work on this Adam. Parks Victoria would be a wonderful organisation to fund offset with. Much better than a Cayman Island registered organisation with plantations in the Amazon. Hopefully the costs of this approach are within the real of possibility for us. On Thu, 8 Aug 2019 at 15:26,

Re: [Talk-de] Änderungen im Wiki: Tag:public transport=platform

Hallo Nzara, deine Ansichten teile ich nicht. Für mich gehört sowohl an pt=platform als auch an pt=stop_position der key name! Eine Ableitung des Namens aus einer stop_area-Relation kann man derzeit nicht leisten, da vieler Orts solch eine Relation nicht gibt. Ich sehe viele Mapper die leider

Re: [OSM-ja] JA: Available Dataの改定提案の議論について

こんにちは、奈良の石川です。議論の整理、ありがとうございます。 On Sunday, August 4, 2019, 7:19:39 AM GMT+9, 石野貴之 wrote: >これを踏まえると、当初の村本さんの提案 >https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ja/2019-June/010597.html >のうち、 >> ■現状 >> ・判定：◎ >> ・用例：ウェブサイト上の店名、住所、電話番号など >> ・判定の理由：事実情報

[Talk-us] Meaning of terminal access

> How are these tags being used? Important for logistics. Indicates where certain classes of vehicles can enter / exit the federally regulated interstate system onto designated local routes. They are marked with trail blaze signs (

Re: [Talk-de] Frage zum tagging Rettungsbaken

Guten Morgen Michael, Am 08.08.2019 um 08:02 schrieb Droelfzehn (Michael): > Wieder daheim bemerke ich, daß der Turm schon eingetragen ist! Für die > Neugierigen: N 49°09.821 W002°01.104 > > Dort sind "nur" 3 Tags eingetragen: > man_made = tower > name = Refuge Tower > tower:type = observation >

Re: [talk-au] [FOSS4G-Oceania] GHG mitigation and FOSS4G SotM Oceania

I don't want to discourage from the local woodlands initiative, I think it's absolutely great to do. I did want to being up the Cool Earth charity[1], which has been through lots of independent evaluation as to their effectiveness. Independent analysis suggests that their rate is at 0.71 USD

[talk-au] Considering future Open Geospatial conferences in Oceania

Hi all, please see the following message below: “What should we do about upcoming conferences for Free and Open Source Software for Geospatial (FOSS4G) and State of the Map (SotM) within our Oceania region?” Image by @mapmakerdavid

[Talk-us] Request for review of plan for scripted edit

Community, I'm planning a scripted change and would like feedback. Plans are outlined here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_edits/blackboxlogic I'd appreciate feedback or questions in the 'Discussion' portion of that wiki page, or within this email list. Thanks, -Alex

Re: [Talk-de] Oberfläche: paved, concrete, asphalt

Ich hatte dazu mal in 2016 ein Auswertung gemacht und dazu auch einen Diary-Eintrag samt Grafik hinterlassen: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Harald%20Hartmann/diary/37965 Am 08.08.19 um 14:53 schrieb Martin Trautmann: > Hallo, > > auf maps.openrouteservice.org habe ich bei der Planung

Re: [Talk-de] Oberfläche: paved, concrete, asphalt

>> Beruhen diese Kennzeichnungen tatsächlich auf Kenntnis des >> Fahrbahnbelags? Oder wird hier gewürfelt? > also paved ist schon man besser als nichts was man auf einer BAB angeben > kann. Die Verfeinerung mit Asphalt oder Beton wäre natürlich optimal dann. Ja, aber paved ist nur auf den

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Track -> Chemin rural

@JB c'est bien pour cela qu'il faut contextualiser avec nos propres besoins de classification sans caser le système. Pour moi beaucoup trop de voies sont classées en highway=unclassified sans raison apparente. Il y a une discussion en parallèle sur la list tagging en lien avec la hiérarchisation

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Track -> Chemin rural

Le 08.08.19 à 15:53, pepilepi...@ovh.fr a écrit : > LE gros problème, c'est que nous discutons entre français, avec nos > habitudes et notre expérience françaises, sur une terminologie et une > classification fortement marquées par les américains. si cela te rassure, le hasard fait qu'il y a en

[OSM-talk-fr] Panneaux de signalisation manquant

Pour faire suite à des discussions que nous avons entamé précédemment. (Désolé de ne pas faire le lien avec les archives) *Conformément à l’article L. 2213-1 du Code général des collectivités territoriales (CGCT ), le maire exerce à l’intérieur

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Panneaux de signalisation manquant

Faire le distingo public/privé ouvert au public, d'après tes références c'est clair, n'a aucun intérêt d'un point de vue OSM. Pouvoir arriver à entrer (ou sortir mais c'est moins grave) en agglomération sans panneau c'est effectivement un problème mais avant tout à signaler à la police

Re: [Talk-se] Lantmäteriets öppna data

Jag måste rätta det jag skrev om höjdkurvor. Jag läste dokumentationen och de är analogt sterokarterade, alltså inte från nationella höjdmodellen. Men de är ändå bättre än de höjdkurvor som finns i OSM där jag har kollat. On 2019-08-08 16:08, Eva Lindberg wrote: Hej! När det gäller ytor har

[Talk-GB] In the news today....

50 years ago, this zebra crossing was about to become the most famous in Britain https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1362022750 ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

Re: [Talk-us] Request for review of plan for scripted edit

On 8/8/2019 1:28 PM, Alex Hennings wrote: Community, I'm planning a scripted change and would like feedback. Plans are outlined here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_edits/blackboxlogic I'd appreciate feedback or questions in the 'Discussion' portion of that wiki page, or within

Re: [Talk-us] Request for review of plan for scripted edit

I'm of mixed feelings on the apparent freshness, but as long as the guidelines are followed so changesets are of reasonable size and easily identified as scripted, I don't see much of an issue. While having an automated script make assumptions caused me to twitch a little, the reality is that a

Re: [Talk-us] Request for review of plan for scripted edit

Fixed: references -> relations. Noted: "False impression of data freshness". I hadn't considered this and I would like more opinions. Regarding "single area-code Question" I think you're talking about 7 digit numbers, and my plan to optimistically appending an area code in cases like Maine where

Re: [Talk-us] Request for review of plan for scripted edit

Given the low numbers of 7-digit numbers I recommend correcting them manually rather than writing code to do it.On Aug 8, 2019 2:02 PM, Alex Hennings wrote:Fixed: references -> relations.Noted: "False impression of data freshness". I hadn't considered this and I would like more opinions.Regarding

Re: [talk-au] [FOSS4G-Oceania] GHG mitigation and FOSS4G SotM Oceania

I've also seen reference to investing in mangroves. Can't see the particular reference just now, but this also discusses the concept further http://awsassets.panda.org/downloads/wwf_iucn_mangroves_investment_effectiveness_guide.pdf Possibly another option? Thanks Graeme

[Talk-GB] Rowmaps importing in South Gloucestershire

In light of some recent edits in South Gloucestershire -- is it ok to import unsurveyed footpaths based simply on rowmaps data? Thanks, Neil ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

Re: [Talk-us] Request for review of plan for scripted edit

I’m really opposed to this idea of scaring people away from editing objects with the “data freshness” boogie man argument. If someone really cares about freshness, the entire history of an object is available to you. On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 at 12:57 PM Kevin Broderick wrote: > I'm of mixed feelings

[Talk-GB] Solar project: Press interview

Hi all, I've been a bit slow to the solar mapping project but have now picked up the baton for outreach. If we can get some press lined up do we have any volunteers to speak with them? Thanks, *Rob* ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org

[Talk-GB] (no subject)

Hi all, The following from Dorothea at OSMF. We'll see what scope there is for OSM UK to answer (likely just re-iterating our aims and membership size). I encourage individuals to respond too. Best wishes Rob Hello, The following survey on global and local communities in OpenStreetMap was

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Panneaux de signalisation manquant

C'est pas le distinguo qui m'intéresse. Le but étant de reprendre la question posée au sénat et la réponse qui en découle. On risque de taguer des classe de vitesse par erreur faute de signalisation adéquat. Ça a donc sa place et répond à des problématiques routine déjà argumenté. Le fait de

Re: [Talk-ee] SviMik_import is back to life

Hi Mihkel Oviir (upd: and Mihkel Rämmel too!), I'm glad to see more people here, even if some of them sound like they had a really bad morning. I had already jumped to conclusion that Jaak is the last person in talk-ee, which makes the community essentially dead since there is no one I can

Re: [Talk-us] Request for review of plan for scripted edit

On 8/8/2019 5:25 PM, Paul Norman via Talk-us wrote: Given the low numbers of 7-digit numbers I recommend correcting them manually rather than writing code to do it. On this one I'm not sure how introducing an error-prone keyboarding exercise into the mix is an improvement over a

Re: [talk-au] [FOSS4G-Oceania] Considering future Open Geospatial conferences in Oceania

hey community I want to temper this a little with Bruce Bannerman’s recent and very relevant comments on where OSGeo Oceania and FOSS4G SotM Oceania are at. The main question being: ‘how many things can we do at once?’ In my mind, a laser focus on bedding in OSGeo Oceania and sorting out all

[Talk-us] data freshness boogie man (was: request for review of plan for scripted edit)

On 8/8/2019 5:52 PM, Bryce Jasmer wrote: I’m really opposed to this idea of scaring people away from editing objects with the “data freshness” boogie man argument. If someone really cares about freshness, the entire history of an object is available to you. That's true for any single object.

Re: [OSM-ja] JA: Available Dataの改定提案の議論について

いいだです。 まとめの方向性に賛成します。 1行でまとめるよりも、行を2つにわけてしまうのはどうでしょう。 > ■現状 > ・判定：◎ > ・用例：ウェブサイト上の店名、住所、電話番号など > ・判定の理由：事実情報 個人的には、「一次情報」というよりも「オフィシャルな情報（公式情報）」の表現のほうがしっくりくるな、と思っています。 なので、「オフィシャルであるウェブサイト上の。。。」あたりでどうでしょう。 > ■現状 > ・判定：☓ > ・用例：オフィシャルな情報以外のウェブサイト上の店名、住所、電話番号など（例: Wikipedia, Wikidata,

Re: [Talk-de] Änderungen im Wiki: Tag:public transport=platform

Die Linien gehen in route_ref, getrennt mit ; Steignummern oder Buchstaben gehen in local_ref. ref ist für Identifikationsnummern. Jede Haltestelle hat eine andere eigene ref-nummer. Ich würde name nur auf das pt=platform/highway=bus_stop setzen, weil ich die nur einmal haben woll, aber das ist

[Talk-se] Lantmäteriets öppna data

Jag är ny användare här och anledningen att jag är intresserad av OSM är att jag vill ha en bra karta för ett visst område i norra Sverige. Området verkar just nu inte vara karterat överhuvudtaget. Det är här: https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=12/63.5201/17.9881 Jag har lite koll på GIS och

Re: [Talk-se] Lantmäteriets öppna data

Tack för svar! Dessa inlägg hade jag inte sett. Har diskussionen fortsatt senare? Som jag skrev nedan tror jag också att NMD är bättre än terrängkartan för markklasser. Framförallt för att den är gjord för att klassa mark medan det blir lite konstigt med markklasser i vektorformat av orsaker

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Track -> Chemin rural

@Stf Pour le cas du chemin rural oui je garderai que la D56. La page du wwiki anglais voudrais que l'on mettent unclassified pour des maillage du reseau permettant la connexion entre de petits ensemble bati. residential pour des route dont la vitesse est limité à cause de la présence de bati donc

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Track -> Chemin rural

Le 08/08/2019 à 13:49, Stéphane Péneau a écrit : > Le gros problème de toute cette discussion, c'est qu'il n'y a pas > d'exemple, de lien vers un highway d'Osm. Non. LE gros problème, c'est que nous discutons entre français, avec nos habitudes et notre expérience françaises, sur une terminologie

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Track -> Chemin rural

@Jérome Amagat je rejoins bien ton point de vu. Un chemin est un chemin! pourquoi mettre ça en highway=unclassified? Le chemin est d'importance local. Il sert à desservir une ferme des champs des bois. A relier les écarts vers un route de plus grand importances. Highway=track n'est pas assimilé

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Track -> Chemin rural

Le 08.08.19 à 14:57, Rpnpif a écrit : > Le 8 août 2019, Jérôme Seigneuret a écrit : > >> Sur la page général alley c'est >> pour le chemin secondaire des résidences ou voies étroites en zone >> européenne pour les centre de type médiévaux... > > En dehors de ce cas je préfère service=driveway

Re: [Talk-se] Lantmäteriets öppna data

Hej! När det gäller ytor har jag skrivit att jag inte tror att terrängkartan är den bästa källan, i alla fall för skog och annan natur. De markklasser som jag tror kan vara användbara i terrängkartan är tätbebyggt område, industriområde och vatten. Det borde dock vara ovanligt att det finns

Re: [Talk-se] Lantmäteriets öppna data

Terrängkartan har diskuterats lite tidigare. Se: https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-se/2019-April/003651.html Den tors 8 aug. 2019 kl 12:00 skrev Eva Lindberg : > Jag är ny användare här och anledningen att jag är intresserad av OSM är > att jag vill ha en bra karta för ett visst

Re: [Talk-de] Oberfläche: paved, concrete, asphalt

Hallo, Am 08.08.2019 um 14:53 schrieb Martin Trautmann: > Beruhen diese Kennzeichnungen tatsächlich auf Kenntnis des > Fahrbahnbelags? Oder wird hier gewürfelt? also paved ist schon man besser als nichts was man auf einer BAB angeben kann. Die Verfeinerung mit Asphalt oder Beton wäre natürlich

[OSM-talk-nl] Hyperlink in window van een pointer werkt niet

Inmiddels heb ik het probleem zelf kunnen oplossen door de informatie van de pointer niet via Tooltip maar via Popup te tonen. Nadeel is wel dat de pointer nu moet worden aangeklikt. Jan Pieter de Groot ___ Talk-nl mailing list

Re: [Talk-de] Änderungen im Wiki: Tag:public transport=platform

Hallo Nzara, da pflichte ich Martin dringend bei. Gut 99% aller Name-Nutzungen an public_transport=platform in Deutschland sind die Namen der Station. Ich habe das für die fünf größten Bundesländer ausgezählt: Land Hst mit Name Hstname Steigref NRW673246630466299 5

Re: [Talk-se] Lantmäteriets öppna data

Hej. Terrängkartan är lite knepig eftersom själva datat är anpassat för att objekt inte ska ligga ovanpå varandra för mycket (så att kartan blir för plottrig). Det innebär att en del objekts positioner har justerats. Tex vägar kan ligga 10 meter fel jämfört med Trafikverkets data. Ytor (som

[Talk-de] Oberfläche: paved, concrete, asphalt

Hallo, auf maps.openrouteservice.org habe ich bei der Planung einer Strecke überwiegend auf Autobahnen überrascht festgestellt, dass tatsächlich oft asphalt oder paved genannt wird - eine überraschende Unterscheidung. Dann wundere ich mich aber wiederum, warum so wenig als concrete markiert ist.

Re: [Talk-de] Oberfläche: paved, concrete, asphalt

sent from a phone > On 8. Aug 2019, at 14:53, Martin Trautmann wrote: > > Denn gerade im Hochsommer mit Dehnungsproblemen bei Betonfahrbahnen mag > die Unterscheidung interessant sein - aber sonst? m.E. sollte man sofern man es weiß, paved und unpaved in einen konkreteren Wert ändern,

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Track -> Chemin rural

Le gros problème de toute cette discussion, c'est qu'il n'y a pas d'exemple, de lien vers un highway d'Osm. Le 08/08/2019 à 11:53, Jérôme Seigneuret a écrit : Du coup highway unclassified reste sur les occupations non résidentielle et hors système forestier et bocager, en landuse

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Track -> Chemin rural

Le 8 août 2019, Jérôme Seigneuret a écrit : > Sur la page général alley c'est > pour le chemin secondaire des résidences ou voies étroites en zone > européenne pour les centre de type médiévaux... En dehors de ce cas je préfère service=driveway qui me semble plus adapté (allée en français).

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Track -> Chemin rural

Exacte et c'est là bien le problème car la définition et l'emploi de cette clé est fait par défaut car la taille du rendu est supérieur à celle d'un driveway. Mais un driveway c'est uniquement pour l'accès terminal pour un batiment donc le dernier tronçon ou la dernière fourche. Un peu comme

Re: [Talk-GB] Tintagel bridge

On Thu, Aug 08, 2019 at 07:23:00AM +0100, Jez Nicholson wrote: > Has anyone prepared Tintagel bridge? Opening on Sunday. As far as I can see, we don't have any local mappers. Perhaps I may have missed some. I am in Cornwall just now, and *might* be able to do a proper survey but it is fair

Re: [Talk-GB] Tintagel bridge

I think the most active Cornwall mappers are further South (around Falmouth and The Lizard). Some of them are focused are lot on foreign humanitarian mapping but also do some mapping locally. There are also some mappers who travel to Cornwall regularly but don't live there. On Thu, 8 Aug 2019 at