Some first results from the OSM community survey
https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2019/09/17/pre-sotm2019-survey-initial-numbers-and-reflections-from-board-members/
Thanks all who submitted! Curious to hear reactions and ideas here and at SotM
* Mikel Maron * +14152835207 @mikel s:mikelmaron
Hi,
We had a tight schedule for this survey, because we want to be able to
present something by the next SotM. That explains why some questions aren't
exactly worded perfectly. It would have been better to get more people
involved and do more testing. But that inevitably slows things down. We did
On Thursday 08 August 2019, Frederik Ramm wrote:
> > By speaking directly and publishing my responses i risk being
> > challenged and criticized personally. While i don't mind this
> > there are definitely a lot of people who don't want or can't do
> > this. And many of them probably would not
Hi,
On 08.08.19 00:52, Christoph Hormann wrote:
> By speaking directly and publishing my responses i risk being challenged
> and criticized personally. While i don't mind this there are
> definitely a lot of people who don't want or can't do this. And many
> of them probably would not mind
On Thursday 08 August 2019, Mikel Maron wrote:
> > My main concern is rather that there are a lot of free form
> > questions yet there is no option for the participants to allow
> > publication of the individual free form answers in anonymized
> > form.
>
> Select “publicly aggregated and
> My main concern is rather that there are a lot of free form questions yet
>there is no option for the participants to allow publication of the individual
>free form answers in anonymized form.
Select “publicly aggregated and anonymously” as answer to the first question
and the free form
On Wednesday 07 August 2019, Frederik Ramm wrote:
>
> I think that part of the motivation for doing surveys is that there
> was a belief that some people don't want to say something in public
> e.g. on a mailing list for fear of their opinion being challenged.
The question is if this fear is
Hi,
On 8/7/19 23:24, Christoph Hormann wrote:
> In other words: What the survey says is you are welcome to provide your
> ideas through the survey but we, the creators of the survey, reserve
> the right to interpret your answers as we see fit and neither you nor
> anyone else may correct us if
Creating a survey that works takes a lot of effort and it is quite
specialised.
Next time it might be worth asking some of the people who like to survey
the OSM community to build the survey incorporating a couple of questions
of their own and do a test run first.
Cheerio John
On Wed, Aug 7,
On Wednesday 07 August 2019, Simon Poole wrote:
>
> @the designers of the survey. The question wrt remote mapping would
> seem to be designed to achieve a specific result.
I can also see some expectations and assumptions being visible 'between
the lines' in some questions but this looks more
On Wednesday 07 August 2019, Dorothea Kazazi wrote:
> Hello,
>
> The following survey on global and local communities in OpenStreetMap
> was developed by board members. The survey is not quantitative and
> its aim is to stimulate discussions in local communities and at the
> Local Chapters
Hello,
A Spanish translation was just sent to us. It is now live at:
https://osmf.limequery.org/428835?lang=es
If anyone wants to translate the survey to additional languages, please
note that you have to:
- commit to translate the answers
- sign a non-disclosure agreement
Thanks Mikel and Eugene.
a reaction to my idea of being able to receive a follow-up ?
Le 07.08.19 à 17:08, Mikel Maron a écrit :
> We did this write up on how the previous survey was useful for board
> discussions, and some summary of what was raised
>
Hi Marc,
On 07.08.19 16:53, marc marc wrote:
> where are the results of the previous survey and the resulting actions
> available?
there were two surveys run by the OSMF in the past months. One was the
survey in advance of the board's face to face meeting in Brussels. We
summarized these survey
On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 10:55 PM marc marc wrote:
> where are the results of the previous survey and the resulting actions
> available?
> I don't remember the exact title but I'm talking about the investigation
> about what osmf could/should do, a few months ago.
>
The OSMF Board published a
We did this write up on how the previous survey was useful for board
discussions, and some summary of what was raised
https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2019/06/13/surveying-openstreetmap/
* Mikel Maron * +14152835207 @mikel s:mikelmaron
On Wednesday, August 7, 2019, 05:55:35 PM GMT+3, marc
Hello,
where are the results of the previous survey and the resulting actions
available?
I don't remember the exact title but I'm talking about the investigation
about what osmf could/should do, a few months ago.
it would be nice to be able to indicate that you want to receive a
notification
Hi Simon :)
There's a typo in the section on communication channels, the first
occurrence of "other mailing lists" is mangled.
Thanks, it is un-mangled now :)
warm greetings,
Dorothea
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
Also note that no questions are required, so you can skip if most comfortable
with that.
* Mikel Maron * +14152835207 @mikel s:mikelmaron
On Wednesday, August 7, 2019, 05:00:05 PM GMT+3, Mikel Maron
wrote:
> The question wrt remote mapping would seem to be designed to achieve a
> The question wrt remote mapping would seem to be designed to achieve a
>specific result.
Not at all. But please do feel free to answer truthfully, and explain anything
in the previous question "Where do you map mostly?"
* Mikel Maron * +14152835207 @mikel s:mikelmaron
On Wednesday,
Hi Dorothea
There's a typo in the section on communication channels, the first
occurrence of "other mailing lists" is mangled.
@the designers of the survey. The question wrt remote mapping would seem
to be designed to achieve a specific result. While a truthful answer on
my behalf would require
21 matches
Mail list logo
