Re: [Taps] Prague agenda planning

Hi all, > On Jun 29, 2017, at 7:09 PM, Tommy Pauly wrote: > > > >> On Jun 29, 2017, at 9:07 AM, Brian Trammell (IETF) wrote: >> >> hi Aaron, >> >>> On 29 Jun 2017, at 17:36, Aaron Falk wrote: >>> >>> Updating. Our agenda time is

Re: [Taps] Prague agenda planning

Hi, In line: > On Jun 29, 2017, at 9:53 PM, Aaron Falk wrote: > > Updated: > > draft-gjessing-taps-minset-05.txt > > There’s been some interesting discussion on the draft. Are there any specific > topics we should set aside time to discuss? I appreciated this

Re: [Taps] Prague agenda planning

Updated: 1. **`draft-gjessing-taps-minset-05.txt`** * There’s been some interesting discussion on the draft. Are there any specific topics we should set aside time to discuss? 2. **Transport Security Protocol Survey**, Tommy - The common features/interface presented by various security

Re: [Taps] Prague agenda planning

Hi Aaron, > On 29. Jun 2017, at 18:07, Brian Trammell (IETF) wrote: > > hi Aaron, > >> On 29 Jun 2017, at 17:36, Aaron Falk wrote: >> >> Updating. Our agenda time is much more productive if we can home in on >> specific questions to discuss rather

Re: [Taps] Prague agenda planning

hi Aaron, > On 29 Jun 2017, at 17:36, Aaron Falk wrote: > > Updating. Our agenda time is much more productive if we can home in on > specific questions to discuss rather than just give document overviews. > Authors & other folk: what’s interesting, unclear, or

Re: [Taps] Prague agenda planning

Updating. Our agenda time is much more productive if we can home in on specific questions to discuss rather than just give document overviews. Authors & other folk: what’s interesting, unclear, or controversial here? * `draft-gjessing-taps-minset-05.txt` * There’s been some interesting