hi Aaron,

> On 29 Jun 2017, at 17:36, Aaron Falk <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Updating. Our agenda time is much more productive if we can home in on 
> specific questions to discuss rather than just give document overviews. 
> Authors & other folk: what’s interesting, unclear, or controversial here?

I think it's time to level up and have a discussion about "policy" and how it 
relates to TAPS.

I'm going to leave the definition of "policy" here deliberately vague with the 
hope that we can start to build some terminology around it at the meeting.

> 
>       • draft-gjessing-taps-minset-05.txt
> 
>               • There’s been some interesting discussion on the draft. Are 
> there any specific topics we should set aside time to discuss?
>       • Socket Intents, Philipp
> 
>               • Again, what specific topics should we discuss?
>               • We’ve been told to expect 3 drafts: on general concepts, BSD 
> implementation, & communication granularity. What’s worth discussing?

Given the focus of the socket intents and granularity work, I think starting 
the policy discussion here makes sense.

>       • Michio Honda HotNets paper “PASTE: Network Stacks Must Integrate with 
> NVMM Abstractions”
> 
>               • “These days I'm working on networking interface for 
> non-volatile main memory (a.k.a. persistent memory and storage-class memory), 
> because with such devices networking stack/API becomes a bottleneck in the 
> end-to-end communication that involves persistent media (disk or SSDs for 
> now). I saw some post-socket discussion in the minutes of the last meeting, 
> so I wonder if this type of work could give some useful information to 
> IETFers who design new transport API standards.”
>               • Is there interest in this topic? AFAIK, there’s no Internet 
> Draft. I will inquire whether Michio intends to submit one.

IMO this is very interesting stuff. Might be better as a tsvarea presentation?

Cheers,

Brian

>       • Transport Security Protocol Survey, Tommy
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Taps mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

_______________________________________________
Taps mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps

Reply via email to