Re: beta/6

2000-09-14 Thread Ming-Li
On Thursday, September 14, 2000, 8:18:30 AM, Steve wrote: Exactly my point on the flip side: what can be accomplished with ini can also be accomplished be registry, theoretically. Easily moving from one computer to another is not one of them. Surviving an OS reinstall (basically the

Re: beta/6

2000-09-14 Thread Steve Lamb
On Thu, Sep 14, 2000 at 09:17:43AM -0700, Ming-Li wrote: I'm not so sure. If the registry or an easily separable part of it contains only application specific data (aka a superset of all INIs), then it's also quite portable, isn't it? This assumes you can /find/ the data in the first

V2 under Linux (was: beta/6)

2000-09-14 Thread Peter Gannushkin
Hello Jamie, Thursday, September 14, 2000, you wrote to me: TF That's my point. TB doesn't run under Linux (yet). ;- JDB V2 will probably written in Delphi 5. JDB Inprise are definitely releasing Delphi 5 for Linux soon. Do you really believe that V2 will ever arrive? I heard from Max about

Re: beta/6

2000-09-14 Thread Ming-Li
On Thursday, September 14, 2000, 9:18:42 AM, Steve wrote: I'm not so sure. If the registry or an easily separable part of it contains only application specific data (aka a superset of all INIs), then it's also quite portable, isn't it? This assumes you can /find/ the data in the first

DEAD HORSE (was Re: beta/6)

2000-09-14 Thread Marck D. Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi tracer, On 14 September 2000 at 22:04:55 GMT +0700 (which was 16:04 where I live) tracer wrote and made these points on the subject of "beta/6": t I guess because we keep asking for it and sofar I havent seen either a t no or yes as response...

Re: beta/6

2000-09-14 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Jamie, On Thu, 14 Sep 2000 16:20:41 +0100 GMT (14/09/2000, 23:20 +0800 GMT), Jamie Dainton [Bat] wrote: JDB it's released. Hopefully we'll be allowed to write plugins for V2. According to The Interview, we will. JDB If that's true look out for Linux and Win plugins from me. Looking

Re: New TB FAQ site

2000-09-14 Thread Syafril Hermansyah
Hello Marck D. Pearlstone, Responding to your article on Tuesday, September 12, 2000 at 15:01:24 GMT +0100 (which was 12/09/2000 21:01 GMT +0700 my Local Time) : MDP Since Leif is going off-line for a while, we have taken the decision MDP to move the TB FAQ web site. It can now be found at

Re[2]: New TB FAQ site

2000-09-14 Thread Andreas Schwartmann
Hello Bat people, on Thursday, September 14, 2000, 7:17:41 PM, Syafril Hermansyah wrote: MDP Please let me know of any problems you have accessing the site or with MDP the content. http://www.marckp.redhotant.com/thebat/shortcut.eng : The page cannot be found The page you are looking for

Re: New TB FAQ site

2000-09-14 Thread Syafril Hermansyah
Hello Andreas Schwartmann, Responding to your article on Friday, September 15, 2000 at 19:35:42 GMT +0200 (which was 15/09/2000 0:35 GMT +0700 my Local Time) : MDP Please let me know of any problems you have accessing the site or with MDP the content. AS

Re: Intpack.exe is damaged

2000-09-14 Thread Paul White
Hello Peter, Thursday, September 14, 2000, 5:05:50 PM, you wrote: PH Hello Maxim, PH this file: PH 14.09.00 18:03 1.163.776 intpack.exe PH seems to be damaged. At least that is what it says if you run it. I have PH downloaded it twice - with no difference ... The ftp site

Re: beta/6

2000-09-14 Thread MaXxX
Hello Ming-Li and all you Batters out there. At Thursday, September 14, 2000, 6:30:23 PM, Ming-Li mashed together that: ML On Thursday, September 14, 2000, 9:18:42 AM, Steve wrote: I'm not so sure. If the registry or an easily separable part of it contains only application specific data (aka

Re[2]: New TB FAQ site

2000-09-14 Thread Andreas Schwartmann
Hello Bat people, on Thursday, September 14, 2000, 7:59:04 PM, Syafril Hermansyah wrote: Syafril Weird, I just tried either http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com or Syafril http://www.marckp.redhotant.com/thebat/faq.html work fine from here. Syafril What happen ? Why you point out to :

Re[2]: beta/6

2000-09-14 Thread Jason Thompson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Steve and everyone else... SL This is security through obscurity and I'd hope that anyone dealing with SL security would know that if you're relying upon obscurity for security, you've SL failed before you started. Oh I agree, the

Re: beta/6

2000-09-14 Thread John Sullivan
On Thursday 14 September 2000 A . Curtis Martin wrote: I don't think there's anyone really actively in favour of using the registry I am! It provides better data-type support, structured data storage, per-user settings, access-control and more. Using the registry also encourages good

Re: beta/6

2000-09-14 Thread Steve Lamb
On Thu, Sep 14, 2000 at 08:18:52PM +0100, John Sullivan wrote: It provides better data-type support How? It is just key/value pairs. structured data storage, No more than I get on a file system except that it isn't divorced from the file system. per-user settings, I get that

Re[2]: beta/6

2000-09-14 Thread David Tod Sigafoos
Hello John, Thursday, September 14, 2000, 12:18:52 PM, you wrote: JS I am! well there is always 1 :-) JS It provides better data-type support, structured data storage, JS per-user settings, access-control and more. Using the registry also JS encourages good data/code separation, and good

Re: beta/6

2000-09-14 Thread John Sullivan
On Thursday 14 September 2000 Steve Lamb wrote: On Thu, Sep 14, 2000 at 08:18:52PM +0100, John Sullivan wrote: It provides better data-type support How? It is just key/value pairs. The values can be ints, strings, strings with environment variables, string lists, binary data and these