Re: test gmail retr

2004-11-18 Thread Thorvald Neumann
Hæ! Wednesday, November 17, 2004, 15:13, Avi Yashar wrote: Confirmed. Gmail's POP3 and SMTP both work very smoothly in TB. And it is very easy to configure TB for both. OK, Gmail just enabled the POP-options for my accounts. POP works, but what settings do I have to use for SMTP? I tried TLS

Re: test gmail retr

2004-11-18 Thread Thorvald Neumann
Hæ! I checked the log and it says: TLS protocol error: Unexpected message. -- Kveðja, Thorvald Neumann | http://www.aesir.de/ | The Bat! v3.0.2.6 Professional PopFile v0.22.0 | Windows 2000 SP4 (v5.0.2195) +---+ | Get Firefox -

Re: test gmail retr

2004-11-18 Thread Tony Boom
Hello Thorvald, A reminder of what Thorvald Neumann on TBBETA typed on: 18 November 2004 at 09:45:16 GMT +0100 I tried TLS to port 587 and entered the specific details under Perform SMTP authentication/Use specific settings... You need to enable STARTTLS for SMTP, TLS is for popping.

Re[2]: test gmail retr

2004-11-18 Thread Peter Hampf
Hello Thorvald, on Thu, 18 Nov 2004 09:45:16 +0100 GMT your local time you wrote: TN POP works, but what settings do I have to use for SMTP? TN I tried TLS to port 587 and entered the specific details under Perform TN SMTP authentication/Use specific settings... Connection: Secure to dedicated

Re: Re[2]: test gmail retr

2004-11-18 Thread Avi Yashar
On Thu, 18 Nov 2004 09:49:27 +0100, Peter Hampf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Connection: Secure to dedicated port 465. And use settings of mail retrieval. That does work here just fine. That's what I use. And it works fine for me too. -- Avi Yashar Windows XP Pro SP2 and The Bat! Pro 3.0.2.4

Re: NFS: erratic behaviour with subfilters

2004-11-18 Thread Maurice Snellen
On Wednesday, November 17, 2004 at 22:00 Boris Anders wrote: Is there a but here or have I constructed my filters wrongly? Can't see a logical error. Your filter seems to be correct else it wouldn't work on refilter. Further more, I heard from (one or two) other user(s) similar problems

Re: NFS: erratic behaviour with subfilters

2004-11-18 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Maurice, On Thu, 18 Nov 2004 13:05:31 +0100GMT (18-11-2004, 13:05 +0100, where I live), you wrote: MS By removing the catchall filter and putting the 'move to @Unhandled' MS folder back in the topmost parent, the filters started behaving as MS expected. What if you use a condition to that

IMAP Auto Filtering...

2004-11-18 Thread Chris Weaven
...has just stopped working for me, for no apparent reason! :-( I have 'Auto-Filtering' enabled and 'Use Precise Counters' enabled aswell. It was working fine up until yesterday when it all of a sudden decided to stop working and I can't work out why, as I've not changed anything. If I manually

Re: IMAP Auto Filtering...

2004-11-18 Thread Allie Martin
Chris Weaven wrote: I have 'Auto-Filtering' enabled and 'Use Precise Counters' enabled aswell. It was working fine up until yesterday when it all of a sudden decided to stop working and I can't work out why, as I've not changed anything. If I manually re-filter, is say's the messages are

Re: NFS: erratic behaviour with subfilters

2004-11-18 Thread Boris Anders
Hello Maurice, Maurice Snellen wrote (in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]): Is there a but here or have I constructed my filters wrongly? Can't see a logical error. Actually, in total there are really a whole lot of filters there, and it proved that I did make an error in the logic. So there is/was

Re: IMAP Auto Filtering...

2004-11-18 Thread Chris Weaven
Hi Allie, On Thursday, November 18, 2004 08:02 your local time, which was 13:02 my local time, Allie Martin [AM] wrote; AM I had experienced this once and it turned out that I did change AM something. I had changed the name of my account and the filters hadn't AM been autoupdated to reflect the

Re: test gmail retr

2004-11-18 Thread Thorvald Neumann
Hæ! Thursday, November 18, 2004, 09:49, Peter Hampf wrote: Connection: Secure to dedicated port 465. And use settings of mail retrieval. That does work here just fine. Thanks, this works. :) Why did they wrote port 587 on Gmail's website? Just wondering... -- Kveðja, Thorvald Neumann |

Re: test gmail retr

2004-11-18 Thread Thorvald Neumann
Hæ! Thursday, November 18, 2004, 09:52, Tony Boom wrote: You need to enable STARTTLS for SMTP, TLS is for popping. TLS works with port 465 for SMTP. -- Kveðja, Thorvald Neumann | http://www.aesir.de/ | The Bat! v3.0.2.6 Professional PopFile v0.22.0 | Windows 2000 SP4 (v5.0.2195)

Re[2]: test gmail retr

2004-11-18 Thread rmorris
Hello Thorvald, Thursday, November 18, 2004, 7:22:00 AM, you wrote: TN Thursday, November 18, 2004, 09:49, Peter Hampf wrote: Connection: Secure to dedicated port 465. And use settings of mail retrieval. That does work here just fine. TN Why did they wrote port 587 on Gmail's website? Just

Re: test gmail retr

2004-11-18 Thread Þorvaldur
Hæ! Thursday, November 18, 2004, 15:00, rmorris wrote: I had to use port 587,could it be different countries,servers? I do not know. Hmmh, strange. -- Kveðja, Thorvald Neumann | http://www.aesir.de/ | The Bat! v3.0.2.6 Professional PopFile v0.22.0 | Windows 2000 SP4 (v5.0.2195)

Re: test gmail retr

2004-11-18 Thread Stefan Dorscht
Hello Þorvaldur, on Thursday, November 18, 2004 at you wrote: Hæ! Thursday, November 18, 2004, 15:00, rmorris wrote: I had to use port 587,could it be different countries,servers? I do not know. Hmmh, strange. Sending from Germany I had to use port 587 - it didn't work using port 465

Re: test gmail retr

2004-11-18 Thread Thorvaldur
Hæ! Thursday, November 18, 2004, 15:37, Stefan Dorscht wrote: Sending from Germany I had to use port 587 - it didn't work using port 465 It's the other way around for me... -- Kveðja, Thorvald Neumann | http://www.aesir.de/ | The Bat! v3.0.2.6 Professional PopFile v0.22.0 | Windows 2000 SP4

Re: gmail

2004-11-18 Thread Leif Gregory
Hello Keith, Wednesday, November 17, 2004, 7:41:36 PM, you wrote: K I still have several, in fact I've got one left, first come first serve. -- __ TBUDL/BETA/DEV/TECH Lists Moderator / PGP 0x6C0AB16B ( ) ( ___)(_ _)( ___) TBUDP Wiki Site:

Lots of gmail traffic around

2004-11-18 Thread Dierk Haasis
Hello Thorvaldur! On Thursday, November 18, 2004 at 4:06:45 PM you wrote: It's the other way around for me... I may not be the strictest when it comes to OT discussions on TBBETA, but all this GMail related messages, shouldn't they be on a GMailBETA list? -- Dierk Haasis :Dierk: Copy

Re: Lots of gmail traffic around

2004-11-18 Thread Kevin J. Menard, Jr.
On Thu, 18 Nov 2004 16:15:50 +0100, Dierk Haasis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I may not be the strictest when it comes to OT discussions on TBBETA, but all this GMail related messages, shouldn't they be on a GMailBETA list? Probably. Or TBOT at the least. But, TBBETA always turns into

Re: Lots of gmail traffic around

2004-11-18 Thread Avi Yashar
On Thu, 18 Nov 2004 16:15:50 +0100, Dierk Haasis wrote: I may not be the strictest when it comes to OT discussions on TBBETA, but all this GMail related messages, shouldn't they be on a GMailBETA list? Dierk, this was somewhat inevitable. Once Gmail introduced its free SMTP and POP3 - making

Re: IMAP Auto Filtering...

2004-11-18 Thread AC Martin
Chris Weaven wrote: AM I had experienced this once and it turned out that I did change AM something. I had changed the name of my account and the filters hadn't AM been autoupdated to reflect the change. Did you make any trivial changes AM as this? Did you write to the lists about this problem,

Re: Lots of gmail traffic around

2004-11-18 Thread Tony Boom
Hello Avi, A reminder of what Avi Yashar on TBBETA typed on: 18 November 2004 at 18:39:48 GMT +0200 As I said, Gmail is hot - not necessarily good - but definitely hot. He's right you know, hot, very hot... Fizzy Hotmail! -- Best regards,Tony.

Re[2]: Lots of gmail traffic around

2004-11-18 Thread Paul Van Noord
Received From: Avi Yashar [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Thu, 18 Nov 2004 16:15:50 +0100, Dierk Haasis wrote: SMTP and POP3 - making it easy to send and receive Gmail via TB - there was bound to be some discussion about configuration and the like. As I said, Gmail is hot - not necessarily good - but

Strange address behaviour

2004-11-18 Thread Peter Hampf
Good evening tbbeta, I frequently get messages from a person Detlev Daßke with this header line: From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?=22Da=DFke=2C_Detlev=22?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] In the message overview window the sender is displayed as Daßke, Detlev but in the message window (header pane) it is

Re: Strange address behaviour

2004-11-18 Thread Zygmunt Wereszczynski
On Thursday, November 18, 2004, at 19:11:17 [UTC+0100] (Thursday, November 18, 2004 19:11 my local time) Peter Hampf wrote: In the message overview window the sender is displayed as Daßke, Detlev but in the message window (header pane) it is displayed as \\Daßke, Detlev [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Strange address behaviour

2004-11-18 Thread Boris Anders
Hello Zygmunt, Zygmunt Wereszczynski wrote (in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]): In the message overview window the sender is displayed as Daßke, Detlev but in the message window (header pane) it is displayed as \\Daßke, Detlev [EMAIL PROTECTED] I also observed such double escaped double quotes

Re: Lots of gmail traffic around

2004-11-18 Thread Tony Boom
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 18 Nov 2004 16:15:50 +0100, Dierk Haasis wrote: I may not be the strictest when it comes to OT discussions on TBBETA, but all this GMail related messages, shouldn't they be on a GMailBETA list? This is what happens between Beta's when

Re[2]: Lots of gmail traffic around

2004-11-18 Thread Sean Rima
Tony, Thursday, November 18, 2004, 9:04:35 PM, you wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 18 Nov 2004 16:15:50 +0100, Dierk Haasis wrote: I may not be the strictest when it comes to OT discussions on TBBETA, but all this GMail related messages, shouldn't they be on

Re: Lots of gmail traffic around

2004-11-18 Thread Tony Boom
Hello Sean, A reminder of what Sean Rima on TBBETA typed on: 18 November 2004 at 21:13:26 GMT + Jezz, speak for yourself, I *never* speak rubbish I do all the time. The art of speaking rubbish is to make it convincing enough for people to believe. Works all the time for me :) For

Re[2]: Lots of gmail traffic around

2004-11-18 Thread Sean Rima
Tony, Thursday, November 18, 2004, 9:33:13 PM, you wrote: Hello Sean, A reminder of what Sean Rima on TBBETA typed on: 18 November 2004 at 21:13:26 GMT + Jezz, speak for yourself, I *never* speak rubbish I do all the time. The art of speaking rubbish is to make it convincing

Re: Lots of gmail traffic around

2004-11-18 Thread Tony Boom
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Sean, A reminder of what Sean Rima on TBBETA typed on: 18 November 2004 at 21:40:56 GMT + Well that is it, you have convinced us all :) I see you stopped using gmail Sean, any reason? - -- Best regards,Tony.

Re[2]: Lots of gmail traffic around

2004-11-18 Thread Sean Rima
Tony, Thursday, November 18, 2004, 10:05:56 PM, you wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Sean, A reminder of what Sean Rima on TBBETA typed on: 18 November 2004 at 21:40:56 GMT + Well that is it, you have convinced us all :) I see you stopped using

Re: Lots of gmail traffic around

2004-11-18 Thread Tony Boom
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Sean, A reminder of what Sean Rima on TBBETA typed on: 18 November 2004 at 22:26:09 GMT + Never used gmail for tbbeta, well not got around to it yet :) I use it for tbot :) Oh sorry, didn't notice that. You'll have to tell me

Re[2]: Lots of gmail traffic around

2004-11-18 Thread Sean Rima
Tony, Thursday, November 18, 2004, 11:00:29 PM, you wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Sean, A reminder of what Sean Rima on TBBETA typed on: 18 November 2004 at 22:26:09 GMT + Never used gmail for tbbeta, well not got around to it yet :) I use it for

Re: test gmail retr

2004-11-18 Thread thn
Hæ! Thursday, November 18, 2004, 15:37, Stefan Dorscht wrote: Sending from Germany I had to use port 587 - it didn't work using port 465 Port 587 works with STARTTLS and TLS works with 465. I am not sure why. What I do not like is Gmail obviously filters my emails to the list, so that I do