Hello Vili,
On Saturday, July 30, 2005, 7:25:09 PM, among other things, you wrote:
V> This .def file is not yet the standard of standards :))
My setup here does not generate a new tbuser.def file when I
delete, or rename, the old one and then customise. Have you any idea why?
--
B
Hello Roger,
V>> I tried with Excel and Word spreadsheets (Office 2000), it works fine.
> Thanks for testing Vili. I am sure the problem is due to some
> peculiarity in the spreadsheet I am using. But it copies OK
> in other versions! Some columns copy, some don't.
Send me the Ex
On Friday, July 29, 2005 at 12:07:03 PM [GMT -0500], Jonathan Angliss
wrote:
> Basic summary, when new mail comes in, the virtual ticker view changes
> the folder that is active from being the "new messages" to the folder
> of the new message.
> I'm using the latest release 3.51.10 on WinXP SP2.
On Friday, July 29, 2005 at 1:37:32 PM [GMT -0500], Gary wrote:
> Well, given this new release, I have found the following
> "deal-breakers." These are new, in addition to the long time problem
> of email bodies not getting loaded to be read.
> Replying to some email, using F4 sometimes inserts t
Hello Vili,
On Saturday, July 30, 2005, 3:36:13 PM, among other things, you wrote:
V> I tried with Excel and Word spreadsheets (Office 2000), it works fine.
Thanks for testing Vili. I am sure the problem is due to some
peculiarity in the spreadsheet I am using. But it copies OK i
On Saturday, July 30, 2005, 10:31:30 AM, Goncalo Farias wrote:
> A filter is defined as a whole. Either it make the whole action or
> it shouldn't do any and throw a warning and deactivate the filter.
I disagree entirely with this. It's kind of like saying that if you
can't keep food down, or ha
Hello Mary!
On Saturday, July 30, 2005, 1:15 PM, you wrote:
> batskin.xml Usually in your TB! root directory--in mine, as a subfile
> within MAIL.
Sorry, I miswrote from memory. My tbuser.def is under MAIL.
batskin.xml is in my TB! root directory.
> Find the lines that have numbers. Change as
Hello Matt!
On Saturday, July 30, 2005, 12:57 PM, you wrote:
> I can't find the e-mail explaining how to adjust the size of the icons
> in the toolbars...which file is that again? And, where in that file can
> I adjust the size?
batskin.xml Usually in your TB! root directory--in mine, as a subf
I can't find the e-mail explaining how to adjust the size of the icons
in the toolbars...which file is that again? And, where in that file can
I adjust the size?
--
Thanks,
Matt
Current beta is 3.51.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http:
Hello Vili,
On Saturday, July 30, 2005, at 1:25:09 PM, you wrote
re: More issues regarding shortcuts in 3.51.10:
V> This .def file is not yet the standard of standards :))
Please correct me if I am wrong, but the problems with tbuser.def seem
to have been introduced by the adding of the new inte
Hello Wayne,
> On Saturday, July 30, 2005, at 1:11:40 PM, you wrote
> re: More issues regarding shortcuts in 3.51.10:
V>> Check the mail list's popup menu, also. F9 is there, too, for source
V>> view. Change that to F11, too.
> Wow that was a quick reply!
:)) I just happened to download the mails
Hello Vili,
On Saturday, July 30, 2005, at 1:11:40 PM, you wrote
re: More issues regarding shortcuts in 3.51.10:
V> Check the mail list's popup menu, also. F9 is there, too, for source
V> view. Change that to F11, too.
Wow that was a quick reply!
That did the trick. Thanks!
Perhaps I was causi
Hello Wayne,
> Over the past several weeks, we have discussed problems and changes
> regarding the tbuser.def file and shortcuts. I had a problem where the
> shortcuts were getting lost when trying a new beta executable. As we
> discussed, this issue was addressed in the last beta.
> However, now
Over the past several weeks, we have discussed problems and changes
regarding the tbuser.def file and shortcuts. I had a problem where the
shortcuts were getting lost when trying a new beta executable. As we
discussed, this issue was addressed in the last beta.
However, now when I try to add short
Hello Alexander,
> Hello Fabio Muzzi & everyone else,
> on 30-Jul-2005 at 15:41 you (Fabio Muzzi) wrote:
>> Maybe someone that runs older versions can help us determine when did the
>> problem show up.
> You can still run 3.0.1.33 (or the last 3.0 beta, 3.0.2.10) yourself to
> check this.
>
Hello Fabio Muzzi & everyone else,
on 30-Jul-2005 at 15:41 you (Fabio Muzzi) wrote:
> Maybe someone that runs older versions can help us determine when did the
> problem show up.
You can still run 3.0.1.33 (or the last 3.0 beta, 3.0.2.10) yourself to
check this.
Versions http://www.neurowerx.
In reply to :
>> and copies the file to the inbox instead of the deleted folder, and
>> that a better default is to stop the filter from doing anything
>> even if the other things it is doing could include sending a copy
>> of the message to another account or another user, changing a colo
In the beta series, the leak was report on the bug track at
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4925
It is very much present in this public release.
Will this be addressed in the next beta. Currently, it does not take
much to run it up to 75 when doing a round of mail responses.
Jerry
--
Hello Alexander!
On Saturday, July 30, 2005, 8:50 AM, you wrote:
>> The tenth of second, er even a shorter time, should be better. I get more
>> than 10 messages/second from my pop3 server.
> ...Thats one of the reasons why I prefer to sort by "created", rather
> than by "received" date. :-)
B
Hello Fabio!
On Saturday, July 30, 2005, 8:41 AM, you wrote:
>>> Here is it: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4998
MB>> Done. Thanks for the careful write-up. :thankyou:
> Thanks, but I can tell you that the issue did show up before 3.5.50,
> not in the 51 beta series, because my 3.5.50 s
Hello Fabio.
On Sat, 2005-07-30 at 15:40 +0200, Fabio Muzzi wrote:
> ASK> If I understood all of this correctly, it boils down to TB not being
> ASK> precise enough in interpreting the received time - it uses the minutes as
> ASK> the smallest unit, while it should really use the seconds, right?
Hello Mary,
Saturday, July 30, 2005, 3:29:53 PM, you wrote:
>> Here is it: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4998
MB> Done. Thanks for the careful write-up. :thankyou:
Thanks, but I can tell you that the issue did show up before 3.5.50, not
in the 51 beta series, because my 3.5.50 show
Hello Alexander,
Saturday, July 30, 2005, 3:24:21 PM, you wrote:
>> So, the issue is that even if I sort in ascending order, where newest
>> messages should be on top, when messages are received from pop3 server in
>> the same minute they get sorted in descending (wrong) order.
ASK> If I u
Hello Roger,
> 9Val, if you are reading this, would you like me to send you a sample
> of the Spreadsheet table?
I tried with Excel and Word spreadsheets (Office 2000), it works fine.
--
Vili
The Bat 3.51.10 on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Szervizcsomag 1
Hello Fabio!
On Saturday, July 30, 2005, 8:13 AM, you wrote:
MB>> If you will write a BT issue report, I will confirm the problem as you
MB>> describe it.
> Here is it: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4998
Done. Thanks for the careful write-up. :thankyou:
--
Best regards,
Mary
The Bat
Hello Fabio Muzzi & everyone else,
on 30-Jul-2005 at 10:52 you (Fabio Muzzi) wrote:
> So, the issue is that even if I sort in ascending order, where newest
> messages should be on top, when messages are received from pop3 server in
> the same minute they get sorted in descending (wrong) ord
Hello Mary,
Saturday, July 30, 2005, 2:31:24 PM, you wrote:
MB> If you will write a BT issue report, I will confirm the problem as you
MB> describe it.
Here is it: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4998
--
Fabio "Kurgan" Muzzi
Using The Bat! v3.5.30 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Ser
Hello Fabio!
On Saturday, July 30, 2005, 7:31 AM, you wrote:
N>> You could do multiple sorting columns. Press CTRL key while yo select
N>> the order of the columns clicking in the header of the message list.
> While this is a great feature that I did not know about, it does not solve
> my probl
Hello Fabio!
On Saturday, July 30, 2005, 3:52 AM, you wrote:
> So, the issue is that even if I sort in ascending order, where newest
> messages should be on top, when messages are received from pop3 server in
> the same minute they get sorted in descending (wrong) order.
I can confirm your
Hello NetVicious,
Saturday, July 30, 2005, 12:47:34 PM, you wrote:
N> You could do multiple sorting columns. Press CTRL key while yo select
N> the order of the columns clicking in the header of the message list.
While this is a great feature that I did not know about, it does not solve
my probl
Hello All,
Periodically I have to distribute data which is displayed in an Excel
spreadsheet. In most cases this is sent as an Excel attachment but
some recipients do not have Excel installed and then I copy and paste
the table into an HTML e-mail. This worked well until version 3.51.
With
sábado, 30 jul 2005 at 10:52, it seems you wrote:
> You can see the screenshot that shows messages received in the same minute
> got sorted the wrong way (oldest to newest). I don't know why, but the
> first message of the group that was fetched at 09:54 got sorted in the
> right order (
Hello MAU & everyone else,
on 30-Jul-2005 at 10:51 you (MAU) wrote:
>> Yes, I use about 10 VFs.
> Do you have "Store state between sessions" in any of them? That seems to
> be the reason and, of course, it will be more evident depending on the
> filter of each VF (how many folders it is looking
Back on sorting problem, I have done proper analysis and now I know
exactly what's wrong, even if I don't know why.
I have checked message order in the fetch log, to see what was the exact
order in which the messages were retrieved from the pop3 server, then I
cross-checked the order
Hello Alexander,
>> Do you use any VFs? See and my
>> reply.
>
> Yes, I use about 10 VFs.
Do you have "Store state between sessions" in any of them? That seems to
be the reason and, of course, it will be more evident depending on the
filter of each VF (how many folders it is looking into, numbe
35 matches
Mail list logo
