Hello Stuart,
I guess this is really to the creators of BayesIt and Bayes Filter,
but what the heck is going on here. I have two computers, one running
BayesIT and the other Bayes Filter and I have had to quit using them
both as they are now starting to classify more good e-mail as bad than
Hello Martin,
But then I can't stop the search - to click the button Stop doesn't
end the search...
Only here?
Not confirmed.
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v3.61.09 Echo (Beta) on Windows XP 5.1 Service Pack 2
Hello Alexander,
Tuesday, October 4, 2005, 4:08:15 PM, you wrote:
ASK Hello Wolffe everyone else,
ASK on 04-Okt-2005 at 22:45 you (Wolffe) wrote:
Is there anyway one can reverse the overtraining?
ASK Just an idea.
ASK You could keep the most recent spam mails, 30 days or so, reset the
Hello MAU,
Wednesday, October 5, 2005, 4:38:19 AM, you wrote:
Have you ever tried POPFile? I've been running it for over 2 years with
an accuracy of 99.81%.
I have not tried any alternative spam filters partially because of
what it says in my sig below. (Windows 98 4.10 Build A)
A. Is this another known bug:
1) Have IMAP Fine Tune Option of Only Download Text (i.e. do not download
attachments)
2) Forward a message where the attachment has not been downloaded
3) Message arrives at recipient with attachment size of zero, i.e.
attachment not included. I
On Wednesday, October 5, 2005, 11:06:42 AM, John Thomas wrote:
1) Have IMAP Fine Tune Option of Only Download Text (i.e. do not
download attachments)
2) Forward a message where the attachment has not been downloaded
3) Message arrives at recipient with attachment size of zero, i.e.
1) Have IMAP Fine Tune Option of Only Download Text (i.e. do not
download attachments)
2) Forward a message where the attachment has not been downloaded
3) Message arrives at recipient with attachment size of zero, i.e.
attachment not included. I could never image a situation where this
10/5/2005 12:35 PM
Hi John,
On 10/5/2005 John Thomas wrote:
I would think what would be buggy is if it sent something besides what
you forwarded, which was a message with no attachment.
JT I intended to forward the message with the attachment, but that is not
JT what happened. I have
Paul Van Noord wrote:
JT I intended to forward the message with the attachment, but that is not
JT what happened. I have determined that the attachment was not sent
JT because of the setting in 1) above because when I reverse the setting
JT in 1) above, the attachment forwards fine.
Seems
10/5/2005 12:48 PM
Hi Michael,
On 10/5/2005 Michael Schneider wrote:
MS Either TheBat! should forward the message incl. attachment
MS or forward without attachment.
MS But it does half of everything - an emtpy attachement.
Perhaps a further choice to include an empty attachment. I can think
On Wednesday, October 5, 2005, 11:46:17 AM, Michael Schneider wrote:
But it does half of everything - an emtpy attachement.
didn't you download a message, leaving the attachment empty, then
forward same?
--
Dwight A. Corrin
928 S Broadway
Wichita KS 67211
316.303.1411 fax 316.265.7568
On Wednesday, October 5, 2005, 11:59:45 AM, Dwight A Corrin wrote:
On Wednesday, October 5, 2005, 11:46:17 AM, Michael Schneider wrote:
But it does half of everything - an emtpy attachement.
didn't you download a message, leaving the attachment empty, then
forward same?
also, you have this
Hello Michael,
On 05 October 2005, 17:46 you wrote:
JT I intended to forward the message with the attachment, but that is not
JT what happened. I have determined that the attachment was not sent
JT because of the setting in 1) above because when I reverse the setting
JT in 1) above, the
Hi list
I have set the POP download option to leave the message on server and
delete them there when deleted from trash locally. Everything ok.
With SPAM filter I have set that detected SPAM should go to a global
Junk folder. This means for the POP configuration that the SPAM will
be left on the
Martin Webster wrote:
Do you have When browsing messages, only retrieve message text
checked in your account settings? If so, what you see is correct
because the attachment isn't in the local cache. TB! is forwarding the
message as it is; nothing more nothing less. It can't send something
it
Wednesday, October 5, 2005, 7:33:10 PM, you wrote:
When I delete the Junk filter now (immediately with CTRL-DEL) they are
^^
messages
Sorry.
--
Best regards,
Martin
TheBat! 3.61.09 Echo (Beta) Pro on Windows 98 4 10 A
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Hi Martin,
on Wed, 5 Oct 2005 19:33:10 +0200GMT, you wrote:
MS I have set the POP download option to leave the message on server and
MS delete them there when deleted from trash locally. Everything ok.
MS With SPAM filter I have set that
Hello Peter,
Wednesday, October 5, 2005, 8:11:50 PM, you wrote:
By all means, there should be the option to delete messages on server
when deleted from Junk, too. After all, the function of the Junk
folder is obvious, so it is consequent to treat it like the trash
folder. Someone should post
But it does half of everything - an emtpy attachement.
didn't you download a message, leaving the attachment empty, then
forward same?
The only reason I would not download the attachment initially is to
speed up my reading of the message. Further, does The Bat! have a way
to indicate which
didn't you download a message, leaving the attachment empty, then
forward same?
also, you have this tagged as IMAP bug, but isn't this behavior same
for POP and IMAP? (Don't know, didn't test, but just asking)
I thought pop automatically downloaded the whole message and
attachments, so if
Do you have When browsing messages, only retrieve message text
checked in your account settings?
Yes
If so, what you see is correct because the attachment isn't in the
local cache. TB! is forwarding the message as it is; nothing more
nothing less. It can't send something it doesn't have! If
If I recieve an eMail with a bigger attachment that is not being
downloaded automatically and I want to forward it, Thunderbird first
downloads the complete message from the server before sending the new
one - just tested it with Tb v1.5.
That sounds right to me.
TheBat! should know if
On Wednesday, October 5, 2005, 2:00:39 PM, John Thomas wrote:
TB! should assume the user wants to forward the whole message
including attachments and the user should only be concerned about
the status of the attachment download when the user wants to use the
attachments.
To me, using the
On Wednesday, October 5, 2005, 1:54:55 PM, John Thomas wrote:
If do not want the attachments forwarded, I would remove them prior
to hitting send.
you removed them before you retrieved them.
--
Dwight A. Corrin
928 S Broadway
Wichita KS 67211
316.303.1411 fax 316.265.7568
dcorrin at
Dwight A Corrin wrote:
To me, using the attachment is what one is doing if one is attempting
to forward it. TB! should assume that the user wants it to do what the
user tells it to do. If the user is not interested in the attachment,
why should TB! know to go back and download it then forward
On Wednesday, October 5, 2005, 2:08:42 PM, Michael Schneider wrote:
Why should some User forward a dummy-attachment?
Can't answer that. Don't know why wouldn't download attachments in the
first place. Bit if took positive steps to disassociate from the
attachment, why should client think was
Dwight A Corrin wrote:
Why should some User forward a dummy-attachment?
Can't answer that. Don't know why wouldn't download attachments in the
first place. Bit if took positive steps to disassociate from the
attachment, why should client think was suddenly interested in what
user left
Hallo Martin,
On Wed, 5 Oct 2005 19:33:10 +0200GMT (5-10-2005, 19:33 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
MS With SPAM filter I have set that detected SPAM should go to a global
MS Junk folder. This means for the POP configuration that the SPAM will
MS be left on the server, too.
The same will
Hello John,
On 05 October 2005, 20:00 you wrote:
Do you have When browsing messages, only retrieve message text
checked in your account settings?
Yes
Because you chose this setting (I use it too) most attachments aren't
retrieved until you attempt to open or save them. The local message
Hello everyone,
I just received a rather long mail from a friend (his travel log), he
always puts links to images of the locations into his mails. Whenever I
click on a link in the preview pane, view it in the browser (Opera here)
and then return to TB, the preview pane jumps back to the first
Hello ...in addition to my previous message...
on 05-Okt-2005 at 22:03 you (Alexander S. Kunz) wrote:
Can anyone confirm this?
A, great, I can't reproduce it anymore now... if I swear it happened,
will anyone believe me? :-)
--
Best regards,
Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de - ICQ
Hello Roelof,
Wednesday, October 5, 2005, 9:27:54 PM, you wrote:
Hallo Martin,
On Wed, 5 Oct 2005 19:33:10 +0200GMT (5-10-2005, 19:33 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
MS With SPAM filter I have set that detected SPAM should go to a global
MS Junk folder. This means for the POP
10/5/2005 4:30 PM
Hi Alexander,
On 10/5/2005 Alexander S. Kunz wrote:
ASK A, great, I can't reproduce it anymore now... if I swear it happened,
ASK will anyone believe me? :-)
Maybe..8-}
--
Take Care,
Paul
The Bat! v.3.61.09 Echo (Beta) on Win2k SP4-Rollup1 5.0.2195
10/5/2005 4:31 PM
Hi Dwight,
On 10/5/2005 Dwight A Corrin wrote:
DAC On Wednesday, October 5, 2005, 2:00:39 PM, John Thomas wrote:
TB! should assume the user wants to forward the whole message
including attachments and the user should only be concerned about
the status of the attachment
Hallo Martin,
On Wed, 5 Oct 2005 22:27:10 +0200GMT (5-10-2005, 22:27 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
MS With SPAM filter I have set that detected SPAM should go to a global
MS Junk folder. This means for the POP configuration that the SPAM will
MS be left on the server, too.
The same will
Hello All,
The Bat! 3.61.10 Echo (Beta) is now available from:
http://www.ritlabs.com/download/the_bat/beta/tbb36110.rar
Here is a short list of changes:
[-] (#0005151) it didn't search for the file with maximal number in name
[-] (#0005150) hints about number of displayed/selected messages were
In reply to mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
9 Hello All,
9 The Bat! 3.61.10 Echo (Beta) is now available from:
9 http://www.ritlabs.com/download/the_bat/beta/tbb36110.rar
9 Here is a short list of changes:
9 [-] (#0005151) it didn't search for the file with maximal number in name
9 [-] (#0005150)
Hello 9Val,
On Wed, 5 Oct 2005 you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
9 The Bat! 3.61.10 Echo (Beta) is now available from:
Oooh. Tab colours are now customizable. Thanks.
--
Regards, Richard
| The Bat! 3.61.10 Echo (Beta) with SpamPal POP3 account
| Windows XP (build 2600), version 5. 1
Hello Peter,
On Wed, 5 Oct 2005 you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PH The [Edit] button for the *first* tab has no effect here. (In
PH Options/Preferences/Tabs)
Confirm
PH - I cannot close (cancel) the [Tab Editor] Window with ESC.
Confirm
--
Regards, Richard
| The Bat! 3.61.10 Echo
On Wednesday, October 05, 2005, at 01:54 PM, John Thomas
wrote:
The only reason I would not download the attachment initially is to
speed up my reading of the message.
Yes. Part of the IMAP protocol includes the ability to download parts
of the message at a time. This allows more efficient use
Hello 9Val!
On Wednesday, October 05, 2005, 3:35 PM, you wrote:
The Bat! 3.61.10 Echo (Beta) is now available from:
http://www.ritlabs.com/download/the_bat/beta/tbb36110.rar
Running okay, so far.
When I checked Help/About after launching this beta, the date for it
was given as 29 Sep 2005
On Wednesday, October 05, 2005, at 03:31 PM, Paul Van Noord
wrote:
DAC To me, using the attachment is what one is doing if one is attempting
DAC to forward it. TB! should assume that the user wants it to do what the
DAC user tells it to do. If the user is not interested in the attachment,
DAC why
Mary Bull [MB] wrote,
When I checked Help/About after launching this beta, the date for it
was given as 29 Sep 2005 23:52:11.
Is that correct?
Not sure if it's correct, but I have the exact same thing here.
--
Regards,
Ron Secord
Using TB! 3.61.10 Echo (Beta) Professional
Under Windows
On Wed, 5 Oct 2005, at 23:35:34 [GMT +0300] (which was 22:35 where I
live) 9val wrote:
Hi 9Val,
The Bat! 3.61.10 Echo (Beta) is now available from:
http://www.ritlabs.com/download/the_bat/beta/tbb36110.rar
Here is a short list of changes:
...snipped
Up and running with OTFE. Just made a
44 matches
Mail list logo
