Dear Peter,
-- Dienstag, 13. Mai 2008, 18:31:04:
If you install the pro version there is no need to install the
intpack. It is included in pro and is only needed with the home
version.
Good, so I can free some space on the HD by deleting the Int.pack.
EC In addition, which is now the
Hello Tbbeta,
http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/beta/tb402410.rar
[-] Fixed a bug in AuthorityKeyIdentifier certificate extension handling that
might cause Root certificate not found error during TLS
--
Best regards,
Maxim Masiutin mailto:[EMAIL
Hi Vilius,
Tuesday, May 13, 2008, 11:20:43 AM, you wrote:
Tuesday, May 13, 2008, 12:16:07 AM, you wrote:
Vilius Šumskas wrote:
I'm wondering where their management is looking?
yikes! what's that?
Do they even have any?
i concur to this question.
That explains
am Dienstag, 13. Mai 2008 um 22:51 schrieb Bob Riley:
I don't think that quick, smart-a__ criticisms of Rit Labs help
anyone. It is an unconstructive way of dealing with your own
frustrations, I believe. It would be better to go on a long walk in
the woods or something.
So do I.
Sure,
am Mittwoch, 14. Mai 2008 um 09:42 schrieb Marck D Pearlstone:
So do I. FYI, Vitalie is no longer a member here. Life is too short,
so let's discuss it no further. ;-)
I already decided not to continue the Thread after my post.
Life is too short, and i am willing to survive here ;-)
--
Mit
[Reply to: »Maxim Masiutin« · 2008-05-14 · 08:38 h (CET)]
Moin, Maxim!
http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/beta/tb402410.rar
Up running!
[-] Fixed a bug in AuthorityKeyIdentifier certificate extension
handling that might cause Root certificate not found error during TLS
Hi Bob,
I don't think that quick, smart-a__ criticisms of Rit Labs help
anyone. [...] It would be better to go on a long walk in the woods
or something.
Do you think that would get us working IMAP? Heaven knows we've tried
everything else.
--
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Alto Speckhardt
Hi,
it ain't ritlabs that needs it. rather, the users need it.
... and does RIT need users?
and, management being a SERVICE, question is - who is ready to pay for it?
I certainly would. What do I care whether TheBat costs 30 or 50 E, but
I want apropriate value for it. I haven't seen such
Guten Tag The Bat! Beta,
maybe it is a update/refresh Problem, i get strange Message Count in
Virutal Subfolders, which show up filtered Content of Main Folder.
Anlagen:
1) 20080514-MsgCount.jpg (26827 Byte, IrfanView JPG File)
--
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Jens Franik
mailto:[EMAIL
5/14/2008 10:08 AM
Hi Vilius,
On 5/14/2008 Vilius Šumskas wrote:
VŠ I
VŠ don't use TB! Anymore,
Congratulations!
VŠ but I'll just stay around and see where
VŠ this joke TB! - IMAP story will end.
Do yourself, the list and Ritlabs a favor and find another forum to
lurk in.
- --
Paul
Hi Paul,
Do yourself, the list and Ritlabs a favor and find another forum to
lurk in.
A little cheap for a retort, don't you think?
Every single point Vilius made in his post is backed by fact and so is
every bit of frustration that may be read both in and between the
lines.
I couldn't
5/14/2008 10:40 AM
Hi Alto,
On 5/14/2008 Alto Speckhardt wrote:
AS A little cheap for a retort, don't you think?
No. Rude, foul-mouthed posts accomplish nothing and deserve a response
that might get the attention of the perpetrator.
AS Every single point Vilius made in his post is backed by
Hallo Paul,
On Wed, 14 May 2008 10:44:32 -0400GMT (14-5-2008, 16:44, where I
live), you wrote:
PVN Maybe you and he can start your own forum.
moderator
Note: This moderator's interjection is a note to all readers and not
just to the person being replied to, even if their post may have
AS I couldn't agree more with him. RIT has let down users of TheBat
big
AS time, and no amount of unquestioning applauding by RIT-yes-men
will
AS be able to cover this.
Maybe you and he can start your own forum.
I think this is not for you to decide. My message was to RitLabs, not to you
Dear Vilius,
@14-May-2008, 18:02 +0300 (14-May 16:02 here) Vilius Šumskas [V] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
... snip
AS be able to cover this.
Maybe you and he can start your own forum.
V I think this is not for you to decide. My message was to RitLabs,
.. Then it should be sent to
Hi Paul,
Maybe you and he can start your own forum.
Don't forget that neither of us is here to please RIT, and that does
(if not, it ought to) include you. This is not a fanclub.
We are here solely because RIT failed to live up to its promises and
does not show any indications on changing this
Dear Rimvydas,
-- Montag, 12. Mai 2008, 17:54:50:
I don't know whats so funny with that.
Agreed!
The Bat! has the bugs in there I paid the money for it and naturally
I want them fixed.
Look at it from the positive side.
- You buy a product 'X' with 'no bug' for 'XY $'.
- Now
AS I couldn't agree more with him. RIT has let down users of TheBat big
AS time, and no amount of unquestioning applauding by RIT-yes-men will
AS be able to cover this.
Maybe you and he can start your own forum.
Spelling Lesson: D-E-A-D H-O-R-S-E
although that is just a private opinion
--
Hello Tbbeta,
http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/beta/tb402410.rar
[-] Fixed a bug in AuthorityKeyIdentifier certificate extension
handling that might cause Root certificate not found error during TLS
There was an irritation bug: if you closed the bat with a folder
In reply to mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
MDP So do I. FYI, Vitalie is no longer a member here. Life is too short,
MDP so let's discuss it no further. ;-)
Hmmm... using the approach that he pointed out in that mid: ? :P
--
Best regards,
Goncalo Farias
In the country of the blind, the one-eyed man
In reply to mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
AS Don't forget that neither of us is here to please RIT, and that
AS does (if not, it ought to) include you. This is not a fanclub.
PVN We are here to help. I have never seen helpfulness in rude
PVN vulgar language.
We are here to provide feedback,
Hi Paul,
Thank you for introducing a degree of reason into a discussion which
will by its very nature, get us absolutely nowhere!
I have found Ritlabs most co-operative when I reported problems over
many years. That there are problems over many years is part of the
real world of software
Hi Paul,
PVN We are here to help. I have never seen helpfulness in rude
PVN vulgar language.
Fine, I appreciate that. (Both of it, in case you're wondering. ;-) )
PVN I didn't quarrel with the content. It was the delivery.
Ok, let's leave it at that, shall we?
--
MfG,
Alto
lunes, 12 may 2008 at 23:30, it seems you wrote:
sábado, 10 may 2008 at 21:22, it seems you wrote:
A member of the Spanish TBUDL said on the list it seems there is a bug
on the QT code.
If we created QTs with an older version (4.0.24) and we type the
%QT[Ctrl+Space] command it will
Hello all,
Thursday, May 15, 2008, NetVicious wrote:
If we created QTs with an older version (4.0.24) and we type the
%QT[Ctrl+Space] command it will activate the QT, but if we use this
activation with a new QT we should get a window asking for the QT we
want to use.
Is this as
25 matches
Mail list logo
