Hi Stefan
Are there any news about the correct implementation of GnuPG (OpenPGP)
into TheBat! Seems to be a very long story...
Martin
On Monday, September 5, 2022 5:45:13 PM you wrote:
> We've been playing with GPGME for some time, trying to adopt it to
> our requirements and su
On Thursday, September 15, 2022, 14:05:11, Stefan Tanurkov via TBBETA wrote:
> That's what we tried to do while TBBETA was silent, it is not that simple, at
> least - with our knowledge of the tools. If you can help us with that, it'd
> be great - looks like we miss some "evident"
Hello Jernej,
It shouldn't be too hard to compile it yourself — I include gpgme in my wget binaries, though I compile it statically. msys2 likely also has prepackaged binaries, too.
That's what we tried to do while TBBETA was silent, it is not that simple, at least - with our knowledge
Hello Stefan,
On Mon, 5 Sep 2022, at 18:45:13 [GMT +0300] (which was 17:45 where I
live) Stefan wrote:
> Please feel free to post your thoughts on this. Thank you!
Would be nice to have such feature:
Automatically check signature
After mail was fethed show the OK icon in mail list and the
On Monday, September 5, 2022, 17:45:13, Stefan Tanurkov via TBBETA wrote:
> We've been playing with GPGME for some time, trying to adopt it to our
> requirements and suddenly discovered that there is no 64bit Windows version
> of GPGME DLL.
It shouldn't be too hard to compile it you
On 05 September 2022 at 16:45 Stefan Tanurkov via TBBETA wrote and
made these points
TBL> Now, we should figure out what would be better - provide GPGME support in
32 bit version only or improve support of console GnuPG eliminating existing
problems in both 32 and 64 bit versions. F
Hello Stefan,
On Mon, 5 Sep 2022, at 18:45:13 [GMT +0300] (which was 17:45 where I
live) Stefan wrote:
> We've been playing with GPGME for some time, trying to adopt it to
> our requirements and suddenly discovered that there is no 64bit Windows
> version of GPGME DLL.
Had you contact
Hello All,
We've been playing with GPGME for some time, trying to adopt it to our requirements and suddenly discovered that there is no 64bit Windows version of GPGME DLL.
Now, we should figure out what would be better - provide GPGME support in 32 bit version only or improve support
Hi The
On Thursday, August 25, 2022 12:09:28 PM you wrote:
> Hello Stefan,
> On Thu, 25 Aug 2022, at 12:42:04 [GMT +0300] (which was 11:42 where I
> live) Stefan wrote:
>> Yeah, I think it's a good idea finally - I see the interface of
>> GPGME didn't change for many y
Hello Stefan,
On Thu, 25 Aug 2022, at 12:42:04 [GMT +0300] (which was 11:42 where I
live) Stefan wrote:
> Yeah, I think it's a good idea finally - I see the interface of
> GPGME didn't change for many years, so we are going to squeeze it into
> development schedule...
Yeah. Us
Hello Gwen,
> the developer of GPG4Win advised devs of mail clients to use GPGME as
> a lib to use de-/encryption/signing/verification of OpenPGP content/mails.
> Had you considered to do this?
Yeah, I think it's a good idea finally - I see the interface of GPGME didn't
change
Hello Stefan,
the developer of GPG4Win advised devs of mail clients to use GPGME as
a lib to use de-/encryption/signing/verification of OpenPGP content/mails.
Had you considered to do this?
--
Regards
Gwen
Using The Bat! Version 10.1.0.2 (32-bit) on Windows 11 10.0 (Build 22000
12 matches
Mail list logo
