Re: HTML Images wrong?

Thanks to the F9 hint from Peter Meyns (THANK YOU!) I've discovered (by using it on the sent message I created from scratch in TB!) that I was incorrect in what I thought I'd found. The sent message showed that TB! had indeed included the Content-Disposition header, but it explicitly set all of

HTML Images wrong?

When I send HTML formatted messages containing embedded images to friends, especially (but not limited to) friends using Thunderbird, they see all of the HTML text and a collection of attachments. They don't even see markers where a missing graphic belongs, as is normally done when an image

Re: HTML Images wrong?

Hi Steven, on Thu, 28 Jun 2007 08:42:31 -0400GMT (28.06.2007, 14:42 +0200GMT here), you wrote: SPV When I send HTML formatted messages... I'm sorry, I can't comment on this, but I can help you with one point: SPV By using Thunderbird's View Message Source command (I SPV wish I could find

Re: HTML Images wrong?

Hello Peter, SPV By using Thunderbird's View Message Source command (I SPV wish I could find that in The BAT!), I compared the SPV original message from The Bat! and the one from GMail... You can get the message source in The Bat! by hitting F9. Or from the menu Specials-View source. -- Best