-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Nick,
on Mon, 2 May 2005 17:20:54 -0700GMT, you wrote:
NA Peter, if you right click GPGTray and go to Launch/GPGShell Prefs/GPGTray,
NA you will find the word wrap setting there... set it to zero.
Thank you Nick. I must have suffered partial
On Mon, 2 May 2005, at 17:20:54 [GMT -0700] (which was 2:20 where I
live) Nick Andriash wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
On Monday, May 02, 2005, at 5:18:04 PM, Peter wrote:
I don't find any respective option (to turn off) in GPGshell.
Peter, if you right click
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
the GnuPG implementation of The Bat! still doesn't allow
secondary
user IDs.
So I tried to sign my previous message
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
with GPGshell, and it returned MS type funky wrapping. So I
refrained
from signing it. But I'll do it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
this is the same message manually re-wrapped and signed with PGP
built-in support.
the GnuPG implementation of The Bat! still doesn't allow secondary
user IDs.
So I tried to sign my previous message
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] with GPGshell, and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
On Monday, May 02, 2005, at 5:18:04 PM, Peter wrote:
I don't find any respective option (to turn off) in GPGshell.
Peter, if you right click GPGTray and go to Launch/GPGShell Prefs/GPGTray,
you will find the word wrap setting there... set it
Hello Martin,
Thursday, September 9, 2004, 8:35:15 PM, you wrote:
MS Strange - over here there is no problem - Sign when completed is
MS enabled and when I Send the message GnuPG asks for the
MS paraphrase and the message is sent immediately...
yes, also here , BUT the message was NOT signed :)
Hello ,
I'm unable to send automatically-signed message with gnupg with TB
3.0.8, is it a bug or my fault ?
gnupg is on my path etc...
--
Saluti,
Stefano
Powered by The Bat! v.3.0.0.8
AntiSPAM : BayesIt! 0.6.01
Database Regarding base: 8953 word(s)
Hi Stefan,
on Thu, 23 Oct 2003 20:33:50 +0300GMT (23.10.03, 19:33 +0200GMT here),
you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
ST New build v2.01.7
ST [-] Bug with encryption in the built-in support for PGP v6-8
Perhaps it works on XP now. But now again, it doesn't on Win98. It was
OK here in 2.01,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi friends,
the plugin for PGP 6.5.8 works well here. With GnuPG however, there are
some problems. TB! lets me sign messages with GPG, but it refuses to
encrypt or decrypt, the error msg telling me that the key was not found
(although it is in my
My experience is that one is better off using GnuPG through the
GPGshell tray program than with The Bat's plug-in. Reliability is
better and the options are greater. I found some of TB's menu options
didn't produce with GnuPG, including poor key management. The tray
options do not produce exta
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 25 Mar 2002 13:21:41 -0600GMT (which was 25.03.02, 20:21 +0100GMT
where I live), Joseph N. wrote this about PGP/GnuPG in 1.60:
JN My experience is that one is better off using GnuPG through the
JN GPGshell tray program than with The Bat's
Hello Peter Meyns,
On Monday, March 25 2002 at 11:09 AM PDT, you wrote:
the plugin for PGP 6.5.8 works well here. With GnuPG however, there are
some problems. TB! lets me sign messages with GPG, but it refuses to
encrypt or decrypt, the error msg telling me that the key was not found
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
@ 20:09:02 +0100 [ Mon, 25 Mar 2002], Peter Meyns [PM] contributed this
to our collective wisdom:
...
PM the plugin for PGP 6.5.8 works well here. With GnuPG however, there
PM are some problems. TB! lets me sign messages with GPG, but it
PM refuses
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
@ 13:21:41 -0600 [ Mon, 25 Mar 2002], Joseph N. [JN] thoughtfully wrote
the following:
...
JN My experience is that one is better off using GnuPG through the
JN GPGshell tray program than with The Bat's plug-in. Reliability is
JN better and the
14 matches
Mail list logo
