PGP/GnuPG in 1.60

2002-03-25 Thread Peter Meyns
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi friends, the plugin for PGP 6.5.8 works well here. With GnuPG however, there are some problems. TB! lets me sign messages with GPG, but it refuses to encrypt or decrypt, the error msg telling me that the key was not found (although it is in my

Re: PGP/GnuPG in 1.60

2002-03-25 Thread Joseph N.
My experience is that one is better off using GnuPG through the GPGshell tray program than with The Bat's plug-in. Reliability is better and the options are greater. I found some of TB's menu options didn't produce with GnuPG, including poor key management. The tray options do not produce exta

Re: PGP/GnuPG in 1.60

2002-03-25 Thread Peter Meyns
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, 25 Mar 2002 13:21:41 -0600GMT (which was 25.03.02, 20:21 +0100GMT where I live), Joseph N. wrote this about PGP/GnuPG in 1.60: JN My experience is that one is better off using GnuPG through the JN GPGshell tray program than with The Bat's

Re: PGP/GnuPG in 1.60

2002-03-25 Thread Nick Andriash
Hello Peter Meyns, On Monday, March 25 2002 at 11:09 AM PDT, you wrote: the plugin for PGP 6.5.8 works well here. With GnuPG however, there are some problems. TB! lets me sign messages with GPG, but it refuses to encrypt or decrypt, the error msg telling me that the key was not found

Re: PGP/GnuPG in 1.60

2002-03-25 Thread Allie C Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 @ 20:09:02 +0100 [ Mon, 25 Mar 2002], Peter Meyns [PM] contributed this to our collective wisdom: ... PM the plugin for PGP 6.5.8 works well here. With GnuPG however, there PM are some problems. TB! lets me sign messages with GPG, but it PM refuses

Re: PGP/GnuPG in 1.60

2002-03-25 Thread Allie C Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 @ 13:21:41 -0600 [ Mon, 25 Mar 2002], Joseph N. [JN] thoughtfully wrote the following: ... JN My experience is that one is better off using GnuPG through the JN GPGshell tray program than with The Bat's plug-in. Reliability is JN better and the