Hello Thomas
On Sunday, March 25, 2007 you wrote:
Hello Vili,
Vili wrote:
V Either way, it is NOT an embarassment.
OK, so we are discussing semantics.
This is more important than semantics! :-)
Yes it is an embarrasment! Turd isn the toilet are one thing but now
VIli has BUGS?
Really
Reply to message sent 03/23/2007, @ 17:07:27 (11:07 AM Locally)
~~~
Hello Marek,
when was installation finished, system reported error in thebat.exe, error
message attached. When I started thebat.exe manually after this, it started
Reply to message sent 03/23/2007, @ 23:38:23 (5:38 PM Locally)
~~~
Hello Zygmunt,
Another problem is lack of Update section in Preferences (see attached
picture). As a consequence, the remain sections are shifted and reference
wrong
Hello Vili
On Sunday, March 25, 2007 you wrote:
Hello Rick,
A bug yes, and embarrassment YES. It is the equivalent of coming to
visit and not flushing the toilet :))
You are weird, man :) It is a totally different situation. While the
shit in the toalet disturbs you, 2 extra reg key
Hello Vili,
On Sun, 25 Mar 2007 17:42:04 +0200 GMT (25/03/2007, 22:42 +0700 GMT),
Vili wrote:
V Either way, it is NOT an embarassment.
OK, so we are discussing semantics.
Call it a bug if you want, because it doesn't work as expected. I
would expect Voyager to leave no traces.
V We
Hello Vili
On Saturday, March 24, 2007 you wrote:
Hello Thomas,
a pass anyway. I will try the first version that doesn't write to
the registry. Voyager is to be used on other people's computers and
it is rather embarrassing that it leaves its marks there.
1. How do they now about it?
Hello Paul,
On Sat, 24 Mar 2007 14:00:02 -0500 GMT (25/03/2007, 02:00 +0700 GMT),
Paul Van Noord wrote:
PVN However, it shouldn't be there but it certainly is not embarrassing.
PVN Embarrassment is an unpleasant emotional state experienced upon having
PVN a socially or professionally
Hello Paul
On Saturday, March 24, 2007 you wrote:
3/24/2007 1:52 PM
Hi Rick,
On 3/24/2007 Rick Grunwald wrote:
Most folks can't even find this bathroom let alone the toilet. I doubt
they will recognize the contents.
lol
--
Rick
The Bat Version 3.98.6
Hello Paul,
On Sat, 24 Mar 2007 14:50:38 -0500 GMT (25/03/2007, 02:50 +0700 GMT),
Paul Van Noord wrote:
TF would expect Voyager to leave no traces.
PVN Me too.
I think there is a bugreport in the BT somewhere. Can you locate it? I
would like to add a comment.
--
Cheers,
Thomas.
Even if a
Hi Thomas,
on Sun, 25 Mar 2007 02:34:56 +0700GMT, you wrote:
TF would expect Voyager to leave no traces.
PVN Me too.
TF I think there is a bugreport in the BT somewhere. Can you locate it? I
TF would like to add a comment.
It's here: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5515
--
Cheers
Hello Peter,
On Sat, 24 Mar 2007 21:42:52 +0100 GMT (25/03/2007, 03:42 +0700 GMT),
Peter Meyns wrote:
TF I think there is a bugreport in the BT somewhere. Can you locate it? I
TF would like to add a comment.
PM It's here: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5515
Thanks.
--
Cheers,
Hi Maxim,
On Fri, 23 Mar 2007 17:46:16 +0200, you [Maxim Masiutin] wrote:
}Here is the list of Changes since 3.80.04 released 03 May 2006:
Did you really have to tell us that you re-wrote the whole thing! ;)
--
Bill
Current beta is
Hello all,
Friday, March 23, 2007, Maxim Masiutin wrote:
Could you please try Voyager 3.98.6 from
http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/voyager_install-3-98-06.exe
when was installation finished, system reported error in thebat.exe, error
message attached. When I started thebat.exe
Hello all,
Friday, March 23, 2007, Maxim Masiutin wrote:
Could you please try Voyager 3.98.6 from
http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/voyager_install-3-98-06.exe
I am unable to activate this token. I have filled Registration Block, hit
Fetch key, got key from browser and entered it
Hello Marek,
Could you please try Voyager 3.98.6 from
http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/voyager_install-3-98-06.exe
I am unable to activate this token. I have filled Registration Block, hit
Fetch key, got key from browser and entered it into Activation utility.
After this, new
Hello all,
Friday, March 23, 2007, Vili wrote:
http://www.thebat.cz/files/voyager_activation_problem.jpg
It puts the serial into that label... Arent you depleted your all
activation?
I have did everything as allways, as I think, this must be a bug.
--
Bye
Marek Mikus
Czech support of The
Hi Maxim,
on Fri, 23 Mar 2007 17:46:16 +0200GMT (23.03.07, 16:46 +0100GMT here),
you wrote:
MM Could you please try Voyager 3.98.6 from
MM http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/voyager_install-3-98-06.exe
Thanks, I did. I had an error message after installation similar to
the one
Friday, March 23, 2007
Sorry dude, my v.3 key block retrieved a key to activate the above version of
Voyager but got an error message for my trouble. Is this version good with
FAT32?
TB v.3.98.4 stay-at-home works good. Voyager goes on the USB stick
running Win98SE with all updates excepting
On Friday, March 23, 2007, at 17:07:27 [UTC+0100] (Friday, March 23, 2007
17:07 my local time) Marek Mikus wrote:
http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/voyager_install-3-98-06.exe
when was installation finished, system reported error in thebat.exe, error
message attached. When I
Hello Charlie,
On Fri, 23 Mar 2007 15:02:39 -0500 GMT (24/03/2007, 03:02 +0700 GMT),
Charlie Kroeger wrote:
CK Sorry dude, my v.3 key block retrieved a key to activate the above version
of
CK Voyager but got an error message for my trouble.
Wait a second: We have to reactivate after upgrading?
Hello Thomas,
On Sat, 24 Mar 2007 you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TF Wait a second: We have to reactivate after upgrading? Does that count
TF towards the five times of new activation we are allowed with Voyager?
Not here I didn't. Installed normally and working fine.
--
Regards,
Richard
|
21 matches
Mail list logo
