Re[5]: The Bat! 4.0

2007-10-15 Thread MikeD (2)
Hello Gleason, Sunday, October 14, 2007, 5:59:25 PM, you wrote: GP I remember a techie friend in the early days of Firebird saying that GP it was superior because it introduced tabs. He didn't seem to think GP that Netscape had tabs. Never heard of Opera. So what was the GP secret? How did

Re[5]: The Bat! 4.0

2007-10-14 Thread Mike Rourke
Hello Gleason, Sunday, October 14, 2007, 4:59:25 PM, you scribbled: GP I remember a techie friend in the early days of Firebird saying that GP it was superior because it introduced tabs. He didn't seem to think GP that Netscape had tabs. Never heard of Opera. So what was the GP secret? How

Re[5]: The Bat! 4.0

2007-10-13 Thread Gleason Pace
Paul, It is your responsibility to find the best combination of features and functionality for your customers and it is your responsibility to acknowledge the limitations and learn to work within them. BTW, this is my 20th year as a consultant and database application developer. Some of my

Re[5]: The Bat! 4.0

2007-10-13 Thread Xav
Hello Paul, Saturday, October 13, 2007, 12:22:57 PM, you wrote: 10/13/2007 6:56 AM Hi Xav, On 10/13/2007 Xav wrote: X Anyone of any type wants or should want a programme that just works. ALL software has some type of limitations, even SecondCopy and Irfanview, two of the best written

Re[5]: The Bat! 4.0

2007-10-12 Thread Gleason Pace
TB is the pick, because it is the most well developed Imap implementation with the most configurable interface, with tolerable html in email display. It is true that Mulberry's Imap is more complete, but I don't find it more trouble free. TheBat!'s IMAP handling is crude and unpredictable. I