Hello,
22 Dec 2001, 6:27:09 AM, Allie C Martin wrote:
ACM I've never threaded by sender, but are you saying that in former
ACM versions, threads containing new messages would be moved to the top of
ACM the message list, leading to easy retrievability?
Yes, we are. It was *very* convenient.
Hello,
22 Dec 2001, 6:46:48 PM, Alexander Leschinsky wrote:
AL JFYI: It was bugfix for beta 15
AL -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
AL [*] Oldest messages are used as thread roots for threading by
AL subject/from/to
AL
Hello,
22 Dec 2001, 9:18:28 PM, Dwight A Corrin wrote:
The way it's being done is illogical. Here is the way a 5-message
thread is being sorted with V1.54 beta 19:
Mon, 17 Dec 2001 08:19:55 EST
Wed, 19 Dec 2001 08:07:38 EST
Tue, 18 Dec 2001 11:34:08 EST
Tue, 18 Dec 2001 10:34:49
Hello,
22 Dec 2001, 6:07:52 AM, Ethan J. Mings wrote:
EJM Golden rule, leave the user no worst off after the change than before.
EJM PS. If I sound frustrated, I just can believe after 19 betas, we are
EJM still trying to find a solution for a non issue. Please fix for the
EJM next beta!
On 24 Dec 2001, 11:19:50 AM, Boris Golberg wrote:
You are talking about treading by references (or standard).
We was talking about treading by from (or another
nonstandard).
Sorry. I never imagined such a thing as threading by from. After
looking at it, I can see why it never
On Fri, 21 Dec 2001 20:02:09 -0500, Ethan J. Mings [EJM] wrote these
comments:
...
It's very annoying to search new messages when the threading by
sender is active...
I organize my Inbox this way and when I get new messages I have to
search through the whole Inbox to find the right thread
On Sat, 22 Dec 2001 12:52:14 +0100, Patrick Cornelißen [PC] wrote
these comments:
...
PC This is not my problem. I use Threading by sender so I have new
PC messages from XYZ and I received the first message from him a long
PC time ago, so the new message is nearly at the bottom of my Inbox
PC
Hi Allie,
On Samstag, 22. Dezember 2001 at 13:27:09, you wrote:
I've never threaded by sender, but are you saying that in former
versions, threads containing new messages would be moved to the top of
the message list, leading to easy retrievability?
IIRC yes.
But I tested it only for
Hello Ron,
On Sat, 22 Dec 2001 18:40:40 -0500 (23.12.2001 04:40 my local time)
you wrote about Sorting when threading by Sender is activated,
at least in part:
RM I suggest that the developers go back to the way the root message was
RM chosen prior to beta 10.
JFYI: It was bugfix
Electronic Message
From:Ethan J. Mings, Principal
Date:12/22/2001 at 10:00 PM.
Subject: Sorting when threading by Sender is activated
-- --
2Jerry - OK, now I saw your technique and I grok it (but it can't work
after beta 15
On 22 Dec 2001, 5:40:40 PM, Ron Mura wrote:
The way it's being done is illogical. Here is the way a 5-message
thread is being sorted with V1.54 beta 19:
Mon, 17 Dec 2001 08:19:55 EST
Wed, 19 Dec 2001 08:07:38 EST
Tue, 18 Dec 2001 11:34:08 EST
Tue, 18 Dec 2001 10:34:49 -0500
Mon,
11 matches
Mail list logo
