Hello all,
Sunday, August 21, 2005, BWMarcotte wrote:
MM I am testing new AGAVA AntispamServant plugin for The Bat!
MM for a week and after two days of learning I have no false
MM positive yet. It is fast and looks very good.
MM But it is a shareware, discounted price for TB users is 20$
MM or
Hello Sean,
Sunday, August 21, 2005, 7:55:58 AM, you wrote:
Hello TBBETA,
In my personal smime cert I see that TB! says it cannot find the
issuer cert for Thawte. How do i fix this, using it's own
implementation of SMIME
Sean
Switched to the MS one and it works, now to synch my
Hallo Thomas,
On Sun, 21 Aug 2005 11:04:30 +0700GMT (21-8-2005, 6:04 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
DA Right, since 3.60.02, the Folder - Maintenance menu item has a hotkey
DA again.
TF Not over here. What am I doing wrong?
Here neither.
--
Groetjes, Roelof
ERROR: 001 Windows loaded.
Saturday, August 20, 2005, 11:03:50 PM, you wrote:
MM I am testing new AGAVA AntispamServant plugin for The Bat! for a week
MM and after two days of learning I have no false positive yet. It is fast
MM and looks very good.
I tried it for a couple of weeks, but it kept tagging as SPAM e-mail
from
domingo, 21 ago 2005 at 10:11, it seems you wrote:
I tried it for a couple of weeks, but it kept tagging as SPAM e-mail
from the same source every day, no matter how many times I tagged it
as not SPAM. Eventually I gave up and have gone back to BayesIT, which
seems to be working a little
Hello,
The virtual folders refresh action is still rather slow with the
latest beta. With about 2000 messages on board, my virtual folder that
shows replies to me took about six seconds to finish refreshing and to
give me access to the other folders.
Six seconds may not sound much, but
8/21/2005 6:38 AM
Hi Thomas,
On 8/21/2005 Thomas Fernandez wrote:
PVN You didn't do it until sometime _after_ v. 3.0.2.10 which is only a
PVN few months.
PVN When reading a message the Tab sequence moves to the attachment after
PVN the message body. No problem here. The attachment is accessed
8/21/2005 7:03 AM
Hi Marek,
On 8/21/2005 Marek Mikus wrote:
MM it is a new plugin released maybe week ago. As I know, Kaspersky
MM Internet Suite will have antispam plugin for The Bat! too, but I do
MM not trust Kaspersky very much after problems with previous versions of
MM KAV.
I use avast!
Het was op zondag 21 augustus 2005 om 13:04 uur dat jij iets schreef over
'3.60.02 and BayesIt' :
Hoi Paul,
MM it is a new plugin released maybe week ago. As I know, Kaspersky
MM Internet Suite will have antispam plugin for The Bat! too, but I do
MM not trust Kaspersky very much after
Peter Palmreuther schrieb:
HMdB Not fixed: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4329
Which gets more and more important as process in developing
theoretical attack pattern against SHA-1 is advancing. In February
complexity to find two different text producing identical SHA-1 hash
was
Good day, Peter.
PM Here is yet another example of a PGP/MIME signed message using RIPEMD160.
gpg: Signature made 08/21/05 16:38:09 using DSA key ID E10774CE
gpg: WARNING: signature digest conflict in message
gpg: Can't check signature: general error
--
WBR, Vladimir 'insider' Prohorov
Good day, Vladimir.
ViP Good day, Peter.
PM Here is yet another example of a PGP/MIME signed message using RIPEMD160.
ViP gpg: Signature made 08/21/05 16:38:09 using DSA key ID E10774CE
ViP gpg: WARNING: signature digest conflict in message
ViP gpg: Can't check signature: general error
I
Sunday, August 21, 2005, 4:13:25 PM, you wrote:
PVN I use avast! and it just works, seamlessly. Terrific product!
Are you saying there's an Avast! antispam plugin? I use their AV
program and love it, and would try their antispam plugin in a
heartbeat!
--
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Hi Vladimir,
on Sun, 21 Aug 2005 16:48:01 +0400GMT (21.08.2005, 14:48 +0200GMT here),
you wrote:
PM Here is yet another example of a PGP/MIME signed message using RIPEMD160.
ViP gpg: Signature made 08/21/05 16:38:09 using DSA key ID E10774CE
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Hi all,
I just renewed a long standing wish to have The Bat! automatically
decrypt or verify PGP messages. Please add support at
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=2960. TIA!
- --
Cheers
Peter
The Bat! v3.60.02 Forerunner (Beta) :beta: on
Hi Sean,
on Sun, 21 Aug 2005 08:14:12 +0100GMT (21.08.2005, 09:14 +0200GMT here),
you wrote:
SR Switched to the MS one and it works, now to synch my gpg keys between
SR the linux box and the XP one :)
Strange: clicking TB!'s security button returns No signed
attributes. The View button on this
Hi Peter,
on Sun, 21 Aug 2005 13:42:53 +0200GMT (21.08.2005, 13:42 +0200GMT here),
you wrote:
PH Answering a rather old (21 days) message (Sunday, July 31, 2005, 17:01)
PH Sometimes, not always, when I press alt+f2, TB connects and receives
mail
PH from 3/4 of the accounts. One to five
On Sun, 21 Aug 2005, at 15:33:09 [GMT +0200] (which was 15:33 where I
live) Peter Meyns wrote:
I just renewed a long standing wish to have The Bat! automatically
decrypt or verify PGP messages. Please add support at
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=2960. TIA!
Note added!
--
Henk M.
Hello Paul,
On Sun, 21 Aug 2005 06:54:53 -0400 GMT (21/08/2005, 17:54 +0700 GMT),
Paul Van Noord wrote:
TF Important for me is that the message pane can be reached in the
TF tab sequence at all.
PVN [Shift][Tab] which is not an editing command will cycle you to the
PVN attachment pane when
On 2005-08-21 at 06:04:30 Thomas Fernandez wrote:
Right, since 3.60.02, the Folder - Maintenance menu item has a hotkey
again.
Not over here. What am I doing wrong?
Maybe the term 'hotkey' is confusing. I don't mean a special key such
as Ctrl-N, like for New Message, but just the quick
Hi George,
Filters don't work here, too. Even if i try to refilter ...
TheBat! tells me, that it searched x mails and y mails were filtered
but absolutely nothing happend.
I can't confirm that. With the exception of the problem I mentioned, I had no
other problems with filters.
Filters act
Hello Dimitry,
On Sun, 21 Aug 2005 16:05:05 +0200 GMT (21/08/2005, 21:05 +0700 GMT),
Dimitry Andric wrote:
DA Maybe the term 'hotkey' is confusing. I don't mean a special key such
DA as Ctrl-N, like for New Message,
I have that one.
DA but just the quick access key in the menu, for example
Hi Dimitry,
on Sat, 20 Aug 2005 21:44:54 +0200GMT (20.08.2005, 21:44 +0200GMT here),
you wrote:
DA Right, since 3.60.02, the Folder - Maintenance menu item has a hotkey
DA again. It was removed for unknown reasons in one of the previous
DA beta's, probably when the whole UI was redone.
DA
Hello Peter,
Sunday, August 21, 2005, 2:37:59 PM, you wrote:
PM Fully supported. Thank you for the details.
PM Here is yet another example of a PGP/MIME signed message using RIPEMD160.
Should there be something wrong with it? See attachment...
--
Best Wishes,
Mark
Good day, Mark.
PM Fully supported. Thank you for the details.
PM Here is yet another example of a PGP/MIME signed message using RIPEMD160.
MP Should there be something wrong with it? See attachment...
There are some troubles when GPG is used.
PS. How looks security button after verifying my
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Hi Mark,
on Sun, 21 Aug 2005 18:03:46 +0200GMT (21.08.2005, 18:03 +0200GMT here),
you wrote:
PM Here is yet another example of a PGP/MIME signed message using RIPEMD160.
MP Should there be something wrong with it? See attachment...
It looks
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Hi Vladimir,
on Sun, 21 Aug 2005 20:17:03 +0400GMT (21.08.2005, 18:17 +0200GMT here),
you wrote:
ViP PS. How looks security button after verifying my message?
gpg: Signature made 08/21/05 18:17:02 using RSA key ID 66D309C9
gpg: Good signature
Good day, Vladimir.
MP Should there be something wrong with it? See attachment...
ViP There are some troubles when GPG is used.
ViP PS. How looks security button after verifying my message?
This message was SHA1-signed. This is signed with SHA256.
--
С уважением, Vladimir 'insider'
Good day, Peter.
ViP PS. How looks security button after verifying my message?
PM SKIP
I was interested with PGP verification, not GPG.
GPG shows green light on that message.
--
WBR, Vladimir 'insider' Prohorov
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[email only]|[3MB inbox]|[ICQ #179598229]|[RLU
Good day, Peter.
PM It looks like you could verify it without an error. Maybe it is
PM related to the OS or the PGP/GnuPG version. Let's try to find out.
PM Which OS do you run? Which version of PGP or GnuPG?
This is GPG-related problem. Or GPG-TB! related.
--
WBR, Vladimir 'insider' Prohorov
I don't know how to specify the problem... but this build cannot proceed
with standard backup of one of my account: is stops on 'sent' folder (~79%
of whole process). I returned to 3.51.10 which works well with the
backup.
Best regards, Krzysztof Kudłacik
--
pb _, )\__/( ,_
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Hi Vladimir,
on Sun, 21 Aug 2005 20:30:17 +0400GMT (21.08.2005, 18:30 +0200GMT here),
you wrote:
ViP I was interested with PGP verification, not GPG.
Sorry, I didn't know. For this message:
gpg: Signature made 08/21/05 18:30:16 using RSA
Hello Peter,
Sunday, August 21, 2005, 6:19:50 PM, you wrote:
PM It looks like you could verify it without an error. Maybe it is
PM related to the OS or the PGP/GnuPG version. Let's try to find out.
PM Which OS do you run? Which version of PGP or GnuPG?
Windows 2000 (see below) and PGP 8.0.2
Hi Peter and list,
On Sunday, August 21, 2005 at 15:33:09 GMT +0200 (which was 15:33
where I live) Peter Meyns wrote (at least in parts) and made these
valuable points on the subject of PGP wish: automatically
decrypt/verify:
Please add support at https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=2960.
Good day, Martin.
MS Hi Vladimir
MS On Sunday, August 21, 2005 6:42:04 PM you wrote:
This is GPG-related problem. Or GPG-TB! related.
MS In my opinion it's a problem how TB! does call GPG. I asked several
MS times if there is a possibility to see the command line which TB
MS sends out - but
Good day, Martin.
This is GPG-related problem. Or GPG-TB! related.
And it is! Peter can remember message, in which I manually parsed
rfc-822 source and successfully verified result.
MS But then I don't understand why Thunderbird and Mulberry have no
MS problem to verify signatures with
Good day, Martin.
There is an error in message splitting, which causes failure in GPG.
MS Which error exactly? How does this wrong message splitting?
MS I sent signed message with TB! - TB! fails to verify - Mulberry has
MS no problem.
MS I sent signed message with Mulberry - TB! fails to
Hello Greg,
Sunday, August 21, 2005, 12:00:20 AM, you wrote:
GS On IMAP at MRB memory was at 33,800K when I first accessed the account
GS and NEVER dropped. After minimizing TB, memory dropped to 2,000K.
GS After maximizing the main window the view folder window while
GS writing this email
Hello Vladimir,
Sunday, August 21, 2005, 6:17:03 PM, you wrote:
ViP PS. How looks security button after verifying my message?
Red, not because it is invalid, but because it's an unknown key...
Couldn't find it on the server PGP is checking. :-(
Of course, the same goes for your other
Hello Peter,
Sunday, August 21, 2005, 2:45:29 PM, you wrote:
Hi Sean,
on Sun, 21 Aug 2005 08:14:12 +0100GMT (21.08.2005, 09:14 +0200GMT here),
you wrote:
SR Switched to the MS one and it works, now to synch my gpg keys between
SR the linux box and the XP one :)
Strange: clicking TB!'s
8/21/2005 3:32 PM
Hi Richard,
On 8/21/2005 Richard H. Stoddard wrote:
PVN I use avast! and it just works, seamlessly. Terrific product!
RHS Are you saying there's an Avast! antispam plugin? I use their AV
RHS program and love it, and would try their antispam plugin in a
RHS heartbeat!
Yes,
8/21/2005 3:58 PM
Hi Mary,
On 8/19/2005 Mary Bull wrote:
MB Please support my BT report at:
MB https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5031
Finally took the time to do it.
--
Take Care,
Paul
The Bat! v.3.0.2.10 on Win2k SP4-Rollup1 5.0.2195
8/21/2005 4:14 PM
Hi Mary,
On 8/19/2005 Mary Bull wrote:
MB https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5032
MB I hope that those who wish to will put supporting notes there.
Did it.
--
Take Care,
Paul
The Bat! v.3.0.2.10 on Win2k SP4-Rollup1 5.0.2195
On 2005-08-20 (20:03), you wrote:
I am testing new AGAVA AntispamServant plugin for The Bat!
http://www.antispamservant.com/bat_plugin.shtml
But it is a shareware, discounted price for TB users is 20$ or 15eur.
But BayesIt is freeware.
Best regards, Krzysztof Kudłacik
--
pb _, )\__/(
Hi,
I received a message with the following link the other day. Nothing
dangerous, just a link to some software for my digital TV set top box.
The only thing different about this is that the first URL has a ? at
the end of it.
In forwarding it, the original message text is quoted, and both
Hello all,
Sunday, August 21, 2005, Krzysztof Kudlacik wrote:
http://www.antispamservant.com/bat_plugin.shtml
BTW I have contacted developers and another improvements are on the
way.
But it is a shareware, discounted price for TB users is 20$ or 15eur.
But BayesIt is freeware.
Yes, as You
Hello Marek,
Saturday, August 20, 2005, 7:03:50 PM, you wrote:
MM I am testing new AGAVA AntispamServant plugin for The Bat! for a week
MM and after two days of learning I have no false positive yet. It is fast
MM and looks very good.
MM But it is a shareware, discounted price for TB users is
Hello Krzysztof,
On Sunday, August 21, 2005, 10:56:44 PM, among other things, you wrote:
KK But BayesIt is freeware.
But it does not work well. I did a completley new re-install a month or
so back and it worked OK initially, but recently it seemed to be
missing more and more spam.
48 matches
Mail list logo
