K9 and GPGrelay

Is it possible to use K9 and GPGrelay at the same time? TIA -- cheer, Henk __ The Bat! Natural E-Mail System™ version 3.61.09 Echo (Beta) Pro on Windows XP SP2 PGPkey at: http://www.biglumber.com/x/web?qs=0X11EECBEEB464DD0F

Re: K9 and GPGrelay

Hallo Henk, On Tue, 4 Oct 2005 08:12:38 +0200GMT (4-10-2005, 8:12 +0200, where I live), you wrote: HDB Is it possible to use K9 and GPGrelay at the same time? Yes, K9 works fine with other proxies. Just take care that you let them listen to different ports. OOTC Is it a beta thing that you're

Re: K9 and GPGrelay

On Tue, 4 Oct 2005, at 11:18:54 [GMT +0200] (which was 11:18 where I live) Roelof Otten wrote: Hallo Henk, On Tue, 4 Oct 2005 08:12:38 +0200GMT (4-10-2005, 8:12 +0200, where I live), you wrote: HDB Is it possible to use K9 and GPGrelay at the same time? Yes, K9 works fine with other

Mulberry Ceases Operations -- Files Chapter 7

An Electronic Message from Ethan J. Mings on 04/10/2005 at 7:10 AM I know a few people on the list have often compared IMAP performance of Mulberry when providing feedback on various Beta Versions. As an information update, Mulberry ceased operations yesterday. If you want to get your final

Re[4]: BayesIt doesn't work as it should

Hello Paul, Monday, October 3, 2005, 4:50:58 PM, you wrote: PVN Novocon at: PVN http://www.novocon.net/ndexspec.html?refid=findanisp.comrefsessid=3725643 PVN offers access for $7.95/mo. and they do not block port 25. It is not a problem of port 25 being blocked. It is a different

Re[5]: BayesIt doesn't work as it should

10/4/2005 7:39 AM Hi MikeD, On 10/4/2005 MikeD (2) wrote: M2 It is not a problem of port 25 being blocked. It is a different M2 authentication methode. Since you have TB, look at the authentication M2 methods. You will see one that is specific to microsoft software M2 called NLM. It is a

Re[3]: BayesIt doesn't work as it should (was: S*P*A*M)

Hello Alexey, Monday, October 3, 2005, 8:34:56 PM, you wrote: No. Believe me, the problem exists. since both filters - my BayesIt and the Bayes Filter use so-called naive bayesian method, they are under the problem of overtraining. AFAIK the K9 creators use some solution to fight against it,

Re[6]: BayesIt doesn't work as it should

Hello Paul, Tuesday, October 4, 2005, 6:41:17 AM, you wrote: PVN 10/4/2005 7:39 AM PVN Hi MikeD, PVN On 10/4/2005 MikeD (2) wrote: M2 It is not a problem of port 25 being blocked. It is a different M2 authentication methode. Since you have TB, look at the authentication M2 methods. You will

Re[3]: BayesIt doesn't work as it should (was: S*P*A*M)

Hello Alexey, No. Believe me, the problem exists. since both filters - my BayesIt and the Bayes Filter use so-called naive bayesian method, they are under the problem of overtraining. AFAIK the K9 creators use some solution to fight against it, and it is only the matter of time when such

Re: BayesIt doesn't work as it should (was: S*P*A*M)

Greetings BatPeople, Tuesday, October 4, 2005, 9:39:15 AM, Vili wrote: V Hello Alexey, No. Believe me, the problem exists. since both filters - my BayesIt and the Bayes Filter use so-called naive bayesian method, they are under the problem of overtraining. AFAIK the K9 creators use some

Re: BayesIt doesn't work as it should (was: S*P*A*M)

Hello Wolffe everyone else, on 04-Okt-2005 at 22:45 you (Wolffe) wrote: Is there anyway one can reverse the overtraining? Just an idea. You could keep the most recent spam mails, 30 days or so, reset the bayesit database and then train it anew with the spam mails you kept for spam and your