Hello Henk,
On Tue, 12 Sep 2006 you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
HMdB It does not happen all the time. This early morning for instance it did
HMdB not happen!
Confirmed. I have my PC and TB! on 24/7 although, yesterday morning, I
did have to close TB! for a while. On restarting I got no
Hello Mary,
Tuesday, September 12, 2006, 3:56:21 AM, you wrote:
And it did not offer you v. 3.81.03, even though you are already
running it?
If so, perhaps the bug is XP related. I notice that you are running on
the platform Win2000.
Sorry, Mary, I cannot confirm either on Win XP. Check
Hello,
I've suddenly got a strange filter problem. A friend of mine has gone to
Geneva for a week for a conference. This morning she sent me a mail,
still using her normal address, which arrived in my Trash folder instead
of her folder. My reply (I BCC all my replies) also ended up in the
Trash
[Reply to: Marek Mikus · 2006-09-08 · 16:51 h (CET)]
Hello, Marek!
Since 3.85.02 the attachment icon is disappearing from messages, if
the message contains only a GIF image used in the HTML part (common
practice from Incedimail).
If there is real attachment (eg. PDF file) the icon displays
Hello George!
On Tuesday, September 12, 2006, 3:50 AM, you wrote:
perhaps the bug is XP related. I notice that you are running on
the platform Win2000.
Sorry, Mary, I cannot confirm either on Win XP. Check for updates works like
expected here. After Help/Check for update I got the No
Hello Mary,
Tuesday, September 12, 2006, 2:28:14 PM, you wrote:
Well, as you may read further in the thread, now it works as expected
here, also.
Yes, I read. I also confirm that checking for update took about 5-10 seconds
IIRC.
I now believe it was not a bug in the TB! v. 3.85.03 code,
Hello Richard,
I've suddenly got a strange filter problem. A friend of mine has gone to
Geneva for a week for a conference. This morning she sent me a mail,
still using her normal address, which arrived in my Trash folder instead
of her folder. My reply (I BCC all my replies) also ended up in
Hello George!
On Tuesday, September 12, 2006, 6:45 AM, you wrote:
Well, I leave the Bat! open all the time so it doesn't quite affect me.
However it affects other people and should be fixed. And if the window with
the update information was resizable it would be even better!
Amen to that! It
Hello MAU,
On Tue, 12 Sep 2006 you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
M Did you take a look at the log to see which filters have triggered, if
M any?
The only log I know is the account log but that shows nothing. It's
just one simple filter. If address matches xxx move to folder yyy
--
Regards,
Hello Mary,
Tuesday, September 12, 2006, 8:28:39 AM, you wrote:
MB I want to emphasize this! It looks more like some misbehavior at the
MB site from which the .xml message is sent in response to notify at
MB start settings in the user's copy, and in response to clicking on
MB Help/Check for
Hello MAU,
Monday, September 11, 2006, 4:28:27 PM, you wrote:
,- [ ]
| This dialog should not hold any processing, it just would be visible
| until the user clicks the OK button.
`-
Isn't that clear enough? :)
You'd think so! grin Musta missed that part.
--
Hello Richard,
M Did you take a look at the log to see which filters have triggered, if
M any?
The only log I know is the account log but that shows nothing. It's
just one simple filter. If address matches xxx move to folder yyy
If the message was received you should at least see a FETCH
Hello MAU,
On Tue, 12 Sep 2006 you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
M If the message was received you should at least see a FETCH line for it
M in the log.
Yup, got that but nothing else at all. Here's the blink that delivered
the errant message, only two messages being received and the other was
Hello Richard,
M If the message was received you should at least see a FETCH line for it
M in the log.
Yup, got that but nothing else at all. Here's the blink that delivered
the errant message, only two messages being received and the other was
to TBBETA.
12/09/2006, 16:55:52: FETCH -
Hello MAU,
On Tue, 12 Sep 2006 you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
M I don't recall any option in Preferences or anywhere for logging or not
M logging filters. Are you by any chance using Common filters?
No, I must have the simplest system of all! I have 39 filters, starting
with a filter for
Hello MAU,
On Tue, 12 Sep 2006 you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
M That's a bit weird, I don't understand why there are 2 FETCH lines for
M each message. I only see one for each message in my logs.
Probably because I'm using AntiSpamSniper and I have it set to filter on
the server so it does
Hello Richard,
No, I must have the simplest system of all! I have 39 filters, starting
with a filter for all unwanted mail that goes straight into the Trash
folder.
H! I'm beginning to think that, like we say in Spain, it is white
and in a bottle. So your first filter moves messages into
Hello Miguel!
On Tuesday, September 12, 2006, 1:28 PM, you wrote:
No, I must have the simplest system of all! I have 39 filters, starting
with a filter for all unwanted mail that goes straight into the Trash
folder.
H! I'm beginning to think that, like we say in Spain, it is white
and
Hello Mary,
On Tue, 12 Sep 2006 you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
MB I need you to tell me in plainer English the meaning of white and in
MB a bottle.
Me too :-)
I've now deleted the filter and re created it so I'll see what happens.
--
Regards,
Richard
| The Bat! 3.85.03 with POP3 account
Hello MAU,
On Tue, 12 Sep 2006 you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
M H! I'm beginning to think that, like we say in Spain, it is white
M and in a bottle. So your first filter moves messages into Trash and
M your 'lost' message ends up in Trash. Yes, I think it is white and in a
M bottle. :)
Hello Mary,
I need you to tell me in plainer English the meaning of white and in
a bottle.
It comes from this puzzle: White and in a bottle, what is it? ;)
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v3.85.03 on Windows XP 5.1 Service Pack 2
Hello Richard,
M H! I'm beginning to think that, like we say in Spain, it is white
M and in a bottle. So your first filter moves messages into Trash and
M your 'lost' message ends up in Trash. Yes, I think it is white and in a
M bottle. :)
I, like Mary, have never heard that saying but I
Hello Richard,
MB I need you to tell me in plainer English the meaning of white and in
MB a bottle.
Me too :-)
I've now deleted the filter and re created it so I'll see what happens.
I would suggest asking your friend to send a new message and disable
your Unwanted filter temporarily to see
Hello Miguel!
On Tuesday, September 12, 2006, 3:09 PM, you wrote:
I need you to tell me in plainer English the meaning of white and in
a bottle.
It comes from this puzzle: White and in a bottle, what is it? ;)
Ah, I get it now. I was trying to have it be more complicated than it
is!
Thanks
Hello MAU,
On Tue, 12 Sep 2006 you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
M However, it could be that your friend's messages
M now meet some of the criteria in the filter.
I hang my head in shame. You're absolutely right!
In my Unwanted filter I have several email addresses and names of
particular
Hello Richard!
On Tuesday, September 12, 2006, 3:43 PM, you wrote:
Thank you very much for making me check the filter yet again. I did it 3
times but the unsizeable dialogue boxes are ridiculously small when
scrolling through. Time for another bug report methinks? ;-)
Indeed, I agree 100 per
Hi Gary!
This is wrong.. it should ***ALWAYS*** be left to the user to decide
whether to continue to use any cert, whether expired, or incorrect name, or
whatever reason
Well, that depends on the protocol. It is not always up to the user to
decide if the protocol (SSL, TLS, whatever)
Hi Raymund,
On Tue, 12 Sep 2006 23:28:20 +0200 UTC (9/12/2006, 4:28 PM -0500 UTC my
time), Raymund Tump wrote:
This is wrong.. it should ***ALWAYS*** be left to the user to decide
whether to continue to use any cert, whether expired, or incorrect name, or
whatever reason
R Well,
Hello Mary,
I need you to tell me in plainer English the meaning of white and in
a bottle.
It comes from this puzzle: White and in a bottle, what is it? ;)
Ah, I get it now. I was trying to have it be more complicated than it
is!
We use this saying to express that something is quite
Hello Richard,
M However, it could be that your friend's messages
M now meet some of the criteria in the filter.
I hang my head in shame. You're absolutely right!
In my Unwanted filter I have several email addresses and names of
particular people whose opinions I'd rather not read. I also
Hello Miguel!
On Tuesday, September 12, 2006, 5:07 PM, you wrote:
We use this saying to express that something is quite obvious. ([If it's]
white and in a bottle, [it's] milk.)
:)
Oh, my! Of course. Dumb me, I was thinking wine or shoe polish. :woe:
You've made me laugh out loud!
--
Best
Hi MAU,
We use this saying to express that something is quite obvious. ([If it's]
white and in a bottle, [it's] milk.)
Or for some of us providing software engineering support ... [it's]
Maalox... ;)
--
Best Regards,
32 matches
Mail list logo
