[SOT] Beta/alpha version question

2011-12-08 Thread Francis Dhumes
Hello, I would say: I never had any major problems with the 5.0 alpha or beta. It seems silly to say that on a this list, designed to report the bugs, but some not-beta-testers lurk the list and understand that all the 5.x version are widely buggy and unusable. And

Re: [SOT] Beta/alpha version question

2011-12-08 Thread Paul Van Noord
12/8/2011 7:48 AM Hi Francis, On 12/8/2011 Francis Dhumes wrote: FD I would say: I never had any major problems with the 5.0 alpha or FD beta. FD It seems silly to say that on a this list, designed to report the bugs, FD but some not-beta-testers lurk the list

Re: [SOT] Beta/alpha version question

2011-12-08 Thread Gunivortus Goos
Hi Paul, Version 5's interface is cumbersome. It may be OK for new users but for those of us who have used v4 previous versions 5 is a step backwards for POP users. Ignoring any bugs, version v5 is a step backwards for us. Version 5 has lost The Bat!'s slick and quick. Since v5 I've very

Re: [SOT] Beta/alpha version question

2011-12-08 Thread Francis Dhumes
Hello, Thursday, December 8, 2011 at 14:03:35, Paul wrote : PVN I have used, and sold, The Bat! since version 1.1 in 1998. I am only an user, I have never planned to sell TB!. The only way I'm involved into development is the translation. PVN Version 5's interface is cumbersome. It may be OK

Re: [SOT] Beta/alpha version question

2011-12-08 Thread Jernej Simončič
On Thursday, December 8, 2011, 14:03:35, Paul Van Noord wrote: Version 5's interface is cumbersome. It may be OK for new users but for those of us who have used v4 previous versions 5 is a step backwards for POP users. Ignoring any bugs, version v5 is a step backwards for us. Version 5 has

Re: [SOT] Beta/alpha version question

2011-12-08 Thread Jernej Simončič
On Thursday, December 8, 2011, 15:22:16, Jernej Simončič wrote: The thing that bothers me most in the current versions is that selecting messages with keyboard is broken - when I'm going through the usual morning messages, using Shift+Down TB will often move the selection start somewhere way

Re: 5.0.26.17

2011-12-08 Thread F.P.
Hi, Am 7. Dezember 2011 17:20 schrieb Ivan Pozdeev v...@mail.mipt.ru: No, if connection 1 sits in folder A and connection 2 wants to move a message from folder B to folder A, it tells connection 1 to exit from the folder A. Not sure if this is connected with F.P.'s issue of filtering 'not

Re[2]: [SOT] Beta/alpha version question

2011-12-08 Thread Paul Van Noord
12/8/2011 10:37 AM Hi Francis, On 12/8/2011 Francis Dhumes wrote: FD PVN Version 5's interface is cumbersome. It may be OK for new users but FD PVN for those of us who have used v4 previous versions 5 is a step FD PVN backwards for POP users. FD I don't understand; I use TB! since 1.62

Re: [SOT] Beta/alpha version question

2011-12-08 Thread Dwight Corrin
On Thursday, December 8, 2011, 7:29:17 AM, Gunivortus Goos wrote: - Clicking on folders, TB 'spontaneously' compacts folders, deletes older messages or tells me, there's nothing to compact. This has NEVER happened to me. You must have settings to not keep messages beyond a certain age

Re: [SOT] Beta/alpha version question

2011-12-08 Thread Dwight Corrin
On Thursday, December 8, 2011, 5:12:12 AM, Francis Dhumes wrote: It seems silly to say that on a this list, designed to report the bugs, but some not-beta-testers lurk the list and understand that all the 5.x version are widely buggy and unusable. And explain outside this list that the 5.x

Re: [SOT] Beta/alpha version question

2011-12-08 Thread Dwight Corrin
On Thursday, December 8, 2011, 9:47:26 AM, Paul Van Noord wrote: Many functions and message list handling are different and not as accessible. The last version of v5 I used was 5.0.24 MSI. After several weeks of attempting to acclimate I went back to v4.2.44.2. can you be more specific.

Re: [SOT] Beta/alpha version question

2011-12-08 Thread Dwight Corrin
On Thursday, December 8, 2011, 8:22:16 AM, Jernej Simončič wrote: The thing that bothers me most in the current versions is that selecting messages with keyboard is broken - when I'm going through the usual morning messages, using Shift+Down TB will often move the selection start somewhere

Re: [SOT] Beta/alpha version question

2011-12-08 Thread Vilius Šumskas
Sveiki, Thursday, December 8, 2011, 6:49:13 PM, you wrote: On Thursday, December 8, 2011, 8:22:16 AM, Jernej Simončič wrote: The thing that bothers me most in the current versions is that selecting messages with keyboard is broken - when I'm going through the usual morning messages, using

5.0.26.18

2011-12-08 Thread Maxim Masiutin
The Bat! 5.0.26.18 (ALPHA) is available at http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/a-5/tb502618.rar What's new in 5.0.26.18 since 5.0.26.17: [-] (#0008107) Forwarding multiple messages from a common folder was using random formats [-] (#0008859) The %MEMO macro was not working for

Re[2]: Errors Out of memory and Access violation at address 776D9C5F in module 'ntdll.dll'

2011-12-08 Thread Marek Mikus
Hello all, Tuesday, December 6, 2011, Maxim Masiutin wrote: MM I got this error some minutes after start of 5.0.26.16 and OS was running MM 15 minutes, there was no other app started and I did not got this ever in MM 5.0.26.x builds. I've contacted Vitaly Sidorov from AntiSpamSniper and we

Re: Crashing (WAS: 5.0.26.17)

2011-12-08 Thread NetVicious
miércoles, 7 dic 2011 at 05:24, it seems you wrote: How you do this? If you must do it through Preferences I am sure there would be no time as TB! crashes before that. I think your problem will be you should be downloading new emails with 5.0.26.17. If you don't have any IMAP account try

Re: Errors Out of memory and Access violation at address 776D9C5F in module 'ntdll.dll'

2011-12-08 Thread NetVicious
martes, 6 dic 2011 at 10:50, it seems you wrote: Are you using the new version of the AntiSpamSniper? It is known to make error in the place that you have referred. If the users install previous version of AntiSpamSniper, there will be no error. I'm using 3.3.1.1 of AntiSpamSniper as you