Re: Full-height account tree

2020-04-17 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello MAU,

On Sat, 11 Apr 2020 13:30:16 +0200 GMT (11-Apr-20, 18:30 +0700 GMT),
MAU wrote:

> Hello Thomas,

>> Please support https://bt.ritlabs.com/view.php?id=1987

> Done.

Not fixed in 9.1.16.msi candidate. But here is a work-around:

I have two toolbars for the main menu, one is the one with texts and
drop-down menus, the other one is the icons. If we undock the text and
let it float, we already established that the account tree snips to
the top. So the problem is only this toolbar, not the one with the
icons.

Now, if I carefully dock it again on top of the toolbar with the
icons, the account tree stays all the way to the top. I have done that
now, so I have my desired screen layout.

I hope this extra piece of information helps fix this bug.

--

Cheers,
Thomas.

Message reply created with The Bat! Version 9.1.16 (64-bit)
under Windows 10.0 Build 18362



'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: The Bat! 9.1.16 MSI files - Toolbar settings nor remembered

2020-04-17 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Martin,

On Fri, 17 Apr 2020 20:04:49 +0200 GMT (18-Apr-20, 1:04 +0700 GMT),
Martin wrote:

> Hi The

> On Friday, April 17, 2020 7:41:08 PM you wrote:

>> The Bat! 9.1.16 MSI files and Voyager are available at:
>> https://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/thebat_32_9-1-16.msi

> Thank you - up and running.

Ditto.

> But it seems that no work was done for this version on the problem
> with the toolbar settings which are not stored.

> https://bt.ritlabs.com/view.php?id=1991

I agree, this bug should be fixed before the release.

--

Cheers,
Thomas.

Message reply created with The Bat! Version 9.1.16 (64-bit)
under Windows 10.0 Build 18362



'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: The Bat! 9.1.16 MSI files & Voyager

2020-04-17 Thread Ethan J. Mings
April 17, 2020

Hello Maxim,

Friday, April 17, 2020, 1:41:08 PM, you wrote:

> https://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/thebat_64_9-1-16.msi

up and running.

Quick start up!

The only problem I continue to see is the reported bug with the
Workspace  | Tool Bars |  Customize | Options
When making changes in this screen, the changes done.
When the program restarts, the changes are lost.

Jerry


--  
Ethan J. Mings
President,
The Desk Consulting Group Inc.
Enabling your organization to anticipate the future with confidence!
1-200 North Service Road W. - Suite 311 | Oakville, Ontario, Canada. L6M 2Y1
Phone 905-825-9938 or 1-877-763-7776 | e-mail supportd...@thedesk.ca
Website https://thedesk.ca/main



'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


The Bat! 9.1.16.1 Voyager

2020-04-17 Thread Maxim Masiutin via TBBETA
The Bat! 9.1.16.1 Voyager is available at:
https://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/voyager_install_9-1-16-1.exe



'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: The Bat! 9.1.16 MSI files & Voyager

2020-04-17 Thread Martin
Hi The

On Friday, April 17, 2020 7:41:08 PM you wrote:

> The Bat! 9.1.16 MSI files and Voyager are available at:
> https://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/thebat_32_9-1-16.msi

Thank you - up and running.

But it seems that no work was done for this version on the problem
with the toolbar settings which are not stored.

https://bt.ritlabs.com/view.php?id=1991

-- 
Best regards,
   Martin
   mar...@postzone.org

TheBat! 9.1.16 Pro (32 with OTFE) on Windows 10.0 18363 



'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: The Bat! 9.1.16 MSI files

2020-04-17 Thread Maxim Masiutin via TBBETA
Hello All,

Friday, April 17, 2020, 8:41:08 PM, Maxim Masiutin wrote:

> signed by “sha512ECDSA” algorithm

It was me who pasted bad characters, not a mailing list software issue or 
whatsoever. The correct text is the following.

[*] In an ECDSA signature, if a hash function had larger digest length (in 
bits) than the field size (which is not a good practice), The Bat! treated 
these signatures as invalid. It might lead to invalid ECC certificates, e.g. 
signed by "sha512ECDSA" algorithm. It might also lead to the following error: 
"TLS protocol error: Internal error BuildClientKeyExchange". For more 
information, see section 6.4 of FIPS.186-4 "ECDSA Digital Signature Generation 
and Verification": it is recommended that the security strength associated with 
the bit length of n and the security strength of the hash function be the same 
unless an agreement has been made between participating entities to use a 
stronger hash function. When the length of the output of the hash function is 
greater than the bit length of n, then the leftmost n bits of the hash function 
output block shall be used in any calculation using the hash function output 
during the generation or verification of a digital signature. A hash function 
that provides a lower security strength than the security strength associated 
with the bit length of n ordinarily should not be used, since this would reduce 
the security strength of the digital signature process to a level no greater 
than that provided by the hash function. 



-- 
Maxim Masiutin
Ritlabs, SRL
Director



'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: The Bat! 9.1.16 MSI files & Voyager

2020-04-17 Thread Maxim Masiutin via TBBETA
Hello Ira,

Friday, April 17, 2020, 8:52:31 PM, you wrote:

> Seems to work, thought there is no link for Voyager that I can see.

Thank you for pointing that out! Will make Voyager in a few hours.

-- 
Maxim Masiutin
Ritlabs, SRL
Director



'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: The Bat! 9.1.16 MSI files & Voyager

2020-04-17 Thread Ira
Hello Maxim,

Friday, April 17, 2020, 10:41:08 AM, you wrote:

Maxim> The Bat! 9.1.16 MSI files and Voyager are available at:
Maxim> https://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/thebat_32_9-1-16.msi
Maxim> https://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/thebat_64_9-1-16.msi

Maxim> What's new since version 9.1.14 released on April 13th, 2020:


Seems to work, thought there is no link for Voyager that I can see.

-- Ira 



'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


The Bat! 9.1.16 MSI files & Voyager

2020-04-17 Thread Maxim Masiutin via TBBETA
The Bat! 9.1.16 MSI files and Voyager are available at:
https://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/thebat_32_9-1-16.msi
https://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/thebat_64_9-1-16.msi

What's new since version 9.1.14 released on April 13th, 2020:

[-] S/MIME did not work since 9.1.10
[-] The Bat! did try to change associations from the Preferences dialog even if 
nothing in this configuration was changed by the user
[*] File type associations (default programs) can no logner be changed from an 
application since Windows 8 or later. So, if The Bat! is running under Windows 
8 or Windows 10, the relevant elements are not shown in the "Applications" tab. 
Besides that, the dialog to associate file types no longer appers when The Bat! 
starts
[*] In an ECDSA signature, if a hash function had larger digest length (in 
bits) than the field size (which is not a good practice), The Bat! treated 
these signatures as invalid. It might lead to invalid ECC certificates, e.g. 
signed by “sha512ECDSA” algorithm. It might also lead to the following 
error “TLS protocol error: Internal error BuildClientKeyExchange”. For more 
information, see section 6.4 of FIPS.186-4 "ECDSA Digital Signature Generation 
and Verification": it is recommended that the security strength associated with 
the bit length of n and the security strength of the hash function be the same 
unless an agreement has been made between participating entities to use a 
stronger hash function. When the length of the output of the hash function is 
greater than the bit length of n, then the leftmost n bits of the hash function 
output block shall be used in any calculation using the hash function output 
during the generation or verification of a digital signature. A hash function 
that provides a lower security strength than the security strength associated 
with the bit length of n ordinarily should not be used, since this would reduce 
the security strength of the digital signature process to a level no greater 
than that provided by the hash function. 



'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: 9.1.14.2

2020-04-17 Thread Andrew Savchenko
Hello Maxim,

Friday, April 17, 2020, 2:47:03 AM, you wrote:

> What's new in 9.1.14.2 since 9.1.14.1:
> [-] S/MIME did not work since 9.1.10
> [!] Toolbars are still glitching more than in v8.X.X branch

Please see above, reported at https://bt.ritlabs.com/view.php?id=1994


-- 
Regards,
A



'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html