Is it possible to use K9 and GPGrelay at the same time?
TIA
--
cheer,
Henk
__
The Bat! Natural E-Mail System version 3.61.09 Echo (Beta) Pro on Windows XP
SP2
PGPkey at: http://www.biglumber.com/x/web?qs=0X11EECBEEB464DD0F
Gos
Hello, MikeD.
You wrote 04.10.2005 @ 2:01 in
using mailer: The Bat! (v3.61.09 Echo (Beta)) Home
>>> I guess this is really to the creators of BayesIt and Bayes Filter,
>>> but what the heck is going on here. I have two computers, one
>>> running BayesIT and the other Bayes Filter and I have h
Alexander, Stuart Cuddy & everyone else,
>> For example I have been marking an e-mail with the following info as spam
>> perhaps 100 times and it still does not stop it.
This is what happened with BayesIt for me and I retired it. It was a
champ for a *long* time, but with the latest TB releases i
10/3/2005 5:46 PM
Hi MikeD,
On 10/3/2005 MikeD (2) wrote:
M2> They use a proprietary authentication (imagine that MS
M2> being proprietary :-/ ) method that is not widely supported (but TB
M2> does )
Novocon at:
http://www.novocon.net/ndexspec.html?refid=findanisp.com&refsessid=3725643
offe
Hello MikeD,
Monday, October 3, 2005, 4:13:06 PM, you wrote:
M2> No, if you are getting false positives you need to make the threshold
M2> number larger not smaller.
I have not changed the original setting, so if I raise it it would be
above the 90 mark.
--
Best regards,
Stuart
sábado, 1 oct 2005 at 13:02, it seems you wrote:
> There is showing a strange symbol in Maintenance centre. Any
> confirmations?
Confirmed here.
It seems the new label component doesn't understand the new line
character (#13)
--
/\/ Using The Bat! 3.61.09 Echo (
Hello Stuart,
Monday, October 3, 2005, 2:34:52 PM, you wrote:
SC> I get too many false positives as it is I could not lower the
SC> threshold.
No, if you are getting false positives you need to make the threshold
number larger not smaller.
SC> I followed a lead someone else left to check to se
Hello Peter,
Monday, October 3, 2005, 3:06:33 PM, you wrote:
PM> There is not much to deal with, once installed and set up for the
PM> accounts. :shrug:
Unfortunately I could never get proxies like K9 to connect to MSN's
servers. They use a proprietary authentication (imagine that MS
being prop
Hello Maxim,
>>>What I found out on my system is, that it reproducibly occurs when you
>>>envoke the F7-search on the folder INBOX! But not neccessarily there, it
>>>also happens on SOME subfolders, not on all, though.
> Does it ocur after backup/restore as described in
> https://www.ritlabs.com/b
On 10/3/05, Peter Meyns wrote:
> MS> As wrote in my first post. I click on the "Find messages" in the
> MS> toolbar on top. The first default search option is "Text" "Contains"
>
> MS> So I give a text string to find and I push the start button. When I
> MS> push the stop button to stop the search
Hi MikeD,
on Mon, 3 Oct 2005 14:01:48 -0500GMT, you wrote:
M2> Have you tried adjusting your 'threshold'? I have been using BayesIt
M2> and have not had that problem. I almost never have false positives.
My problem with BayesIt were not false positives. There were none.
M2> But between 20 and
Hello Dwight,
Monday, October 3, 2005, 2:36:11 PM, you wrote:
>> Account/Properties/Mail Management/For Predefined Folders use these
>> Mailboxes. When you put a checkmark beside each item it uses a server
>> based folder. So put a checkmark beside the Sent and Trash folder and
>> select the folde
Hello MikeD,
A reminder of what MikeD (2) typed on:
Monday, October 03, 2005 at 14:01:48 GMT -0500
M2> Hi Stuart,
M2> on Mon, 3 Oct 2005 08:39:26 -0500GMT, you wrote:
>>> I guess this is really to the creators of BayesIt and Bayes Filter,
>>> but what the heck is going on here. I have two co
On Monday, October 3, 2005, 11:57:28 AM, Stuart Cuddy wrote:
DAC>> I suppose if I poked around I could figure this out, but how
DAC>> does one switch to server side sent folder with local outbox?
DAC>> I'd love to do that.
> Account/Properties/Mail Management/For Predefined Folders use these
> Ma
Hello Maxim,
Monday, October 3, 2005, 1:14:06 PM, you wrote:
>> As wrote in my first post. I click on the "Find messages" in the
>> toolbar on top. The first default search option is "Text" "Contains"
> I did the same but could not reproduce this bug :-(((
Update:
I tried it again after full ma
Hi Stuart,
on Mon, 3 Oct 2005 08:39:26 -0500GMT, you wrote:
>> I guess this is really to the creators of BayesIt and Bayes Filter,
>> but what the heck is going on here. I have two computers, one
>> running BayesIT and the other Bayes Filter and I have had to quit
>> using them both as they are n
Hello Dwight,
Monday, October 3, 2005, 11:35:38 AM, you wrote:
DAC> On Sunday, October 2, 2005, 4:15:19 PM, Curtis wrote:
>> I use a server side sent folder and trash. The outbox is local.
DAC> I suppose if I poked around I could figure this out, but how does one
DAC> switch to server side sent
Hello Peter,
Monday, October 03, 2005, 18:05:09, you wrote:
>>What I found out on my system is, that it reproducibly occurs when you
>>envoke the F7-search on the folder INBOX! But not neccessarily there, it
>>also happens on SOME subfolders, not on all, though.
Does it ocur after backup/restore
Hello Martin,
Saturday, October 1, 2005, 2:35:11 PM, you wrote:
> Hello Denis,
> Saturday, October 1, 2005, 1:02:58 PM, you wrote:
>> There is showing a strange symbol in Maintenance centre. Any
>> confirmations?
> Can't confirm on Win98SE.
Correction - I can confirm on Win98SE
http://home.t
Battyfolk,
For a long time now I have been getting a piece of spam that I can't
filter out & it's really getting on my nerves.
Message is entirely HTML w attachment
There is no text
spam comes in the form of a gif (name changes as well)
All headers seem random
X-Spam: [F=0.5893273767; heur=0.727
10/3/2005 12:59 PM
Hi Dwight,
On 10/3/2005 Dwight A Corrin wrote:
DAC> I think once they undertook to become an IMAP client, they undertook
DAC> the responsibility to make it work. It doesn't seem selfish to expect
DAC> them to keep the promise they made.
Agreed. When does one consider the pro
Hi Stuart,
on Mon, 3 Oct 2005 08:39:26 -0500GMT, you wrote:
SC> I guess this is really to the creators of BayesIt and Bayes Filter,
SC> but what the heck is going on here. I have two computers, one running
SC> BayesIT and the other Bayes Filter and I have had to quit using them
SC> both as they
Dwight A Corrin wrote:
>> Wanting IMAP improvements and providing complete and informative
>> feedback to the developers is a good thing. Expecting them to focus
>> on IMAP seems quite selfish to me.
>
> I think once they undertook to become an IMAP client, they undertook
> the responsibility to
On Monday, October 3, 2005, 5:22:38 AM, Paul Van Noord wrote:
> Wanting IMAP improvements and providing complete and informative
> feedback to the developers is a good thing. Expecting them to focus
> on IMAP seems quite selfish to me.
I think once they undertook to become an IMAP client, they un
On Sunday, October 2, 2005, 4:15:19 PM, Curtis wrote:
> I use a server side sent folder and trash. The outbox is local.
I suppose if I poked around I could figure this out, but how does one
switch to server side sent folder with local outbox? I'd love to do
that.
--
Dwight A. Corrin
928 S Broa
On Monday, October 3, 2005, 11:23:13 AM, Stuart Cuddy wrote:
I know of this. Hitting the 'reset' button in the IMAP folder
management panel often solves this.
>>> It did not work for me this time. This folder management panel is
>>> probably something new users struggle with. Is that
Hello Dwight,
Monday, October 3, 2005, 11:24:43 AM, you wrote:
DAC> On Sunday, October 2, 2005, 1:19:01 PM, John Thomas wrote:
>>> I know of this. Hitting the 'reset' button in the IMAP folder
>>> management panel often solves this.
>> It did not work for me this time. This folder management pa
On Sunday, October 2, 2005, 1:19:01 PM, John Thomas wrote:
>> I know of this. Hitting the 'reset' button in the IMAP folder
>> management panel often solves this.
> It did not work for me this time. This folder management panel is
> probably something new users struggle with. Is that any way to
Hello Stuart Cuddy & everyone else,
on 03-Okt-2005 at 15:39 you (Stuart Cuddy) wrote:
> For example I have been marking an e-mail with the following info as spam
> perhaps 100 times and it still does not stop it.
That was my experience with BayesIt in the past, too. I marked the same
kind of mes
Hello Mark,
A reminder of what Mark Partous typed on:
Monday, October 03, 2005 at 17:14:01 GMT +0200
MP> Hello Stuart,
MP> Monday, October 3, 2005, 3:39:26 PM, you wrote:
SC>> I guess this is really to the creators of BayesIt and Bayes Filter,
SC>> but what the heck is going on here. I hav
Hello Stuart,
Monday, October 3, 2005, 3:39:26 PM, you wrote:
SC> I guess this is really to the creators of BayesIt and Bayes Filter,
SC> but what the heck is going on here. I have two computers, one running
SC> BayesIT and the other Bayes Filter and I have had to quit using them
SC> both as th
On Mon, 3 Oct 2005, at 14:47:16 [GMT +0200] (which was 14:47 where I
live) Peter Meyns wrote:
MS>> As wrote in my first post. I click on the "Find messages" in the
MS>> toolbar on top. The first default search option is "Text" "Contains"
MS>> So I give a text string to find and I push the start b
Hello tbbeta,
I guess this is really to the creators of BayesIt and Bayes Filter,
but what the heck is going on here. I have two computers, one running
BayesIT and the other Bayes Filter and I have had to quit using them
both as they are now starting to classify more good e-mail as bad than
it a
Hi Martin,
on Mon, 3 Oct 2005 12:50:15 +0200GMT, you wrote:
MS> As wrote in my first post. I click on the "Find messages" in the
MS> toolbar on top. The first default search option is "Text" "Contains"
MS> So I give a text string to find and I push the start button. When I
MS> push the stop butt
> TB was, is, and will be the best POP client. For the developers to
> focus only on IMAP is to abandon what brought TB to where it is.
> Expecting them to focus on IMAP seems quite selfish to me.
I understand your concern. As a solution perhaps Ritlabs could
immediately abandon the IMAP focus if
Hello Martin,
Monday, October 3, 2005, 1:50:15 PM, you wrote:
> As wrote in my first post. I click on the "Find messages" in the
> toolbar on top. The first default search option is "Text" "Contains"
I did the same but could not reproduce this bug :-(((
--
Best regards,
Maxim
Paul Van Noord wrote:
> Expecting them to focus on IMAP seems quite selfish to me.
I don't think it is selfish to demand, what the developers promised (for
two years now).
Michael
--
03.10.2005, 13:14
Glück ist ein Stuhl, der plötzlich dasteht, wenn man sich zwischen zwei
andere setzen will. (
Hello Maxim,
Monday, October 3, 2005, 12:37:37 PM, you wrote:
>>>You are right - I forgot to write in the original post that the
>>>problems over here are with OTFE.
> How can I reproduce this problem? It never hangs in my case.
As wrote in my first post. I click on the "Find messages" in the
to
Hello Krzysztof Kudlacik & everyone else,
on 03-Okt-2005 at 12:39 you (Krzysztof Kudlacik) wrote:
> During leaving TB! I got all there AV/errors - see attachments
Did you know that you don't have to make screenshots of error messages?
Press CTRL-C & paste the text contents into the editor window
on 2005-09-30 (17:26), you wrote:
> [-] Other : AVs on editor invokation
During leaving TB! I got all there AV/errors - see attachments
Best regards, Krzysztof Kudłacik
--
pb _, )\__/( ,_ Polska Strona Programu The Bat! |
/'.;`-.`{..}',-';.`\ http://thebat.pl |
/'.
Hello Martin,
Monday, October 03, 2005, 10:46:03, you wrote:
>>You are right - I forgot to write in the original post that the
>>problems over here are with OTFE.
How can I reproduce this problem? It never hangs in my case.
--
Best regards,
Maxim Masiutinmailto:[EMAI
10/3/2005 6:12 AM
Hi John,
On 10/2/2005 John Thomas wrote:
JT> My thought was if the developers used only IMAP they could
JT> have more experiences that IMAP users have. If they only use POP, they
JT> will not have those experiences.
TB was, is, and will be the best POP client. For the develop
Hello John Thomas,
On Monday, 03 Oktober 2005 at 02:45, you wrote:
> I would like to go on record as saying that IMAP is much better with
> your settings, but still needs work.
Yes, and that's indeed a curious situation. One really can't count how often
this process of getting IMAP work better
Hello Jay,
Monday, October 3, 2005, 6:00:08 AM, you wrote:
> With OTFE, the search has never worked for me. Not only the Stop
> button does not stop, but the search never finishes. Hence, confirmed
> and reconfirmed... to the point that this basic feature is the only
> thing that I am interested
44 matches
Mail list logo
