Hallo tbbeta,
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=3157
When you create a new event in the scheduler with a message that's
supposed to be sent to all linked contacts, TB creates a new
message all right, but addresses it to Max 0, Stefan 0,
Alexander 0, 9Val 0, etc.
It inserts 0 for
Hi all,
again there are missing folders. Lost somewhere between yesterday evening
and about one to two weeks ago. :-(
I'm running TB Prof with OTFE, so folder names are encrypted on the hard
disk.
This time creating new folders with the same name like mentioned in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] does not
Hallo Martin,
On Tue, 6 Dec 2005 10:27:55 +0100GMT (6-12-2005, 10:27 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
MS I'm running TB Prof with OTFE, so folder names are encrypted on the hard
MS disk.
Yuck, try to encrypt their names.
MS Also Shift-Crtl-Alt-L does not work (but this is for IMAP only,
MS
Hi Nick,
On Mon, 5 Dec 2005, at 13:55:15 [GMT -0600] (which was 20:55 where I live)
you wrote about: 'Voyager - I'm crying Uncle.'
Hello Robert,
What is your setting for Home Directory in Account Properties/Files
Directories. Did you speficy a complete path or are you using Default.
I have
Reply to message sent 12/05/2005, @ 20:44:25 (1:44 PM Locally)
~~~
Hello Robert,
Get rid of that and let everything be relative to the General Mail
Directory, and it works.
Wow, what an adventure that turned out to be!
I changed
On Monday, December 5, 2005 @ 10:59:45 AM [-0700], Roelof Otten wrote:
MT Not sure if it's been mentioned yet (couldn't tell through all of the
MT Voyager related chatter) but now that Voyager seems to be a hot topic,
MT shouldn't we create a VoyagerBETA list?
Don't think that's necessary. I
Is there any way to refer to a text file for cookies in Voyager
without specifying a drive designation?
Thanks,
--
Fly for now,
òžó Nick
Danger
[MUA: The Bat! v3.63.07 (BETA)]
[OS: Windows XP 5 1]
Current beta is 3.63.06 | 'Using
Hello Ian...
On Wed, 7 Dec 2005 06:55:51 +1100, you wrote:
Hi,
I don't know if others feel the same way, but I find the confirmation
dialog at the end a spell check (particularly) when sending a message
very annoying. It is not as though you can do anything other than pick
OK. It can also have
Nick,
On 06-12-2005 20:41, you [ND] wrote in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
ND Is there any way to refer to a text file for cookies in Voyager
ND without specifying a drive designation?
Maybe we need to be able to enter virtual/relative folders, like
%maildir% or %programdir%.
--
greeting Best regards
Hallo Nick,
On Tue, 6 Dec 2005 13:41:13 -0600GMT (6-12-2005, 20:41 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
ND Is there any way to refer to a text file for cookies in Voyager
ND without specifying a drive designation?
%ProgramDir
--
Groetjes, Roelof
In God we trust. All others we monitor... A Naval
Reply to message sent 12/06/2005, @ 20:51:38 (1:51 PM Locally)
~~~
Hello Peter,
Maybe we need to be able to enter virtual/relative folders, like
%maildir% or %programdir%.
Yeah, it would also be nice for using filters to run external
Reply to message sent 12/06/2005, @ 22:42:51 (3:42 PM Locally)
~~~
Hello Roelof,
%ProgramDir
BINGO!
Thanks Roelof.
--
ò.ó Nick
Danger
Current beta is 3.63.06 | 'Using
Reply to message sent 12/06/2005, @ 22:42:51 (3:42 PM Locally)
~~~
Hello Roelof,
%ProgramDir
Odd. It works fine when called directly, but doesn't seem to work when
nested and called via a %QINCLUDE macro.
--
ò.ó Nick
Danger
hi ian,
I don't know if others feel the same way, but I find the confirmation
dialog at the end a spell check (particularly) when sending a message
very annoying. It is not as though you can do anything other than pick
OK. It can also have other side effects.
a further quirk of the spell
On Tuesday, December 6, 2005, at 15:59:13 [UTC-0600] (Tuesday, December 6,
2005 22:59 my local time) Nick Danger wrote:
%ProgramDir
Odd. It works fine when called directly, but doesn't seem to work when
nested and called via a %QINCLUDE macro.
Probably you use single % prefix sign in QT.
On Tuesday, December 6, 2005, at 23:31:36 [UTC+0100] (Tuesday, December 6,
2005 23:31 my local time) Zygmunt Wereszczynski wrote:
On Tuesday, December 6, 2005, at 15:59:13 [UTC-0600] (Tuesday, December 6,
2005 22:59 my local time) Nick Danger wrote:
Odd. It works fine when called directly,
On Tuesday, December 6, 2005, 4:16:01 PM, mark davidson wrote:
I don't know if others feel the same way, but I find the
confirmation dialog at the end a spell check (particularly) when
sending a message very annoying. It is not as though you can do
anything other than pick OK. It can also
Mary Bull wrote on 06/12/2005 at 02:14:48 +1100
subject Green PGP butten even with altered message :
Who is able to detect that the message is modified?
I could not.
The alteration was not detected here, using PGP 6.5.8ckt.
Thank you for feedback! :)
I have opened a bugtracker entry:
Hello Hendrik!
On Tuesday, December 06, 2005, 6:23 PM, you wrote:
Who is able to detect that the message is modified?
I could not.
The alteration was not detected here, using PGP 6.5.8ckt.
Thank you for feedback! :)
You're most welcome. :)
I have opened a bugtracker entry:
hi dwight,
a further quirk of the spell checker implementation in TB is that
the terms 'ignore all' and 'cancel' are defined at odds with spell
checkers in other e-mail programs i've used.
I just ran the spell check using both the 'check entire text' option
and 'check before send/queue' and
Hello Stefan,
Tuesday, December 6, 2005, 1:17:17 PM, you wrote:
SR Hello List! Hi Narayana,
SR on 06.12.2005 at 04:57 [UTC +0530] you wrote:
Token activation data is invalid. Please run the Token activation
utility.
SR This is because of the Volume Serial Number changed.
I am not able to
On Tuesday, December 6, 2005, 7:37:42 PM, mark davidson wrote:
interesting ... i tested and retested to be sure of my facts, or at
least what i was experiencing, before posting to the list. TB here
is set to 'check before send/queue'.
so did I. If you are set to only spell check after you
22 matches
Mail list logo
