-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Friday, September 15, 2000, 3:29:10 AM, Deryk wrote:
It was meant for server applications, it's great at that :) Bringing
it to the desktop seems a daft idea though. You can't suddenly
convert several million Windows users unless there's
On Thu, Sep 14, 2000 at 09:17:43AM -0700, Ming-Li wrote:
I'm not so sure. If the registry or an easily separable part of it
contains only application specific data (aka a superset of all
INIs), then it's also quite portable, isn't it?
This assumes you can /find/ the data in the first
On Thu, Sep 14, 2000 at 08:18:52PM +0100, John Sullivan wrote:
It provides better data-type support
How? It is just key/value pairs.
structured data storage,
No more than I get on a file system except that it isn't divorced from the
file system.
per-user settings,
I get that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Monday, September 04, 2000, 1:23:28 PM, Avenarius wrote:
That's no excuse.
Yes, that is an excuse. You are in a different view, the context is
different. I prefer my clients not assume to try to know what to do in
certain situations. IE, I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Monday, August 28, 2000, 2:08:45 PM, Ulrich wrote:
Recently I found those dictionaries on the Wintertree web site
http://www.wintertree-software.com/app/dictionaries-for-office/index.html
and I wonder if anybody has a clue if those can be used in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
How did you get the keys?
- --
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
ICQ: 5107343 | main connection to the switchboard of souls.
-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Friday, August 11, 2000, 8:31:03 AM, Deryk wrote:
How did you get the keys?
Going to the dark side? Just checking em out I hope :)
You can get the keys (certificates) from:
http://www.thawte.com/certs/personal/contents.html
Right, how
On Wed, Aug 02, 2000 at 02:08:01PM +0200, Christopher J. Trybowski wrote:
You may type www.something.com as well as (www.something.com), but
between [] it doesn't work...
Generally because the accepted way of doing it doesn't include []'s. In
fact, I think only 's is technically
Cluster selects work. Woo! Woo!! *dance, dance, dance* WOO!
Now, imagine how happy I'd be if IMAP worked. :)
--
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
ICQ: 5107343 | main connection to the switchboard of souls.
Tuesday, August 01, 2000, 11:24:44 AM, Nick wrote:
Well now, if memory serves and you live on the left coast I'd guess
that kind of happiness would mean rioting, looting, and setting cars
on fire. Kinda like when the Lakers won the Championship, eh? :-P
Nope. I'm not a sports fan. Only
Ral simple reason.
Home account. Work account. Different PGP keys for just that reason.
One "default" doesn't cut it. :)
--
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
ICQ: 5107343 | main connection to the switchboard of souls.
Tuesday, August 01, 2000, 12:43:27 PM, Nick wrote:
designate a particular Key using the %SIGNCOMPLETE macro, so the only
option I have found was in unchecking the caching of the passphrase.
Yup, which is unacceptable for a program which so readily handles every
other aspect of multiple,
On Wed, Jul 19, 2000 at 11:50:25AM -0500, Nick Danger wrote:
While I don't doubt that takes place, is it really a major concern for
most folks? Anybody snooping my email will be one bored snooper.
Sure, I understand a concern for privacy but what could be a realistic
figure of sent email
BTW, can you send me Januk's message? I deleted one too many last night.
:(
Friday, July 14, 2000, 6:00:13 AM, Ming-Li wrote:
I also don't like TB marks all messages higher than the unread one
bold. I don't use *nix, hence no experience with Mutt.
That is another problem I have.
Friday, July 14, 2000, 8:47:24 AM, David wrote:
BUT if you are going to be in the windows environment there are some things
(common ui principles, some functionality such as launching on request) that
need to be included.
Or like having the CUA keys work like every other CUA application?
Friday, July 14, 2000, 9:55:00 AM, Januk wrote:
First, a simple change. Make it possible for threads to be expanded by
default upon entering a folder.
I would be ambivalent to this suggestion.
Which is why its wording is "possible" denoting it as an option, not a
standard behavior.
Friday, July 14, 2000, 10:07:58 AM, David wrote:
When windows first arrived on the market we did what we wanted .. just like
in the old dos days. But the reason for standards, as we learned, is not to
hold back on innovation but to allow a common interface for users.
Not that Microsoft
Friday, July 14, 2000, 10:25:35 AM, Ming-Li wrote:
Are we using the same Bat?
Yes.
distinguishable with its different subject) are still under the same
thread, except being promoted one level.
And I went into my debian-devel folder, found a thread I didn't want to
read, deleted the
Monday, June 26, 2000, 4:52:22 PM, Allie wrote:
SL I've only gotten it on folders that have threading turned on.
The folder that I'm having the problem with is indeed threaded.
Hmmm, are you using TB!'s threading now? :-)
Also my problems were on deletes, not moves, so it
Wednesday, February 16, 2000, 3:24:57 PM, Dieter wrote:
So why forced to 192.168.0.1?
It is a Microsoft product and you need to ask this?
--
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
ICQ: 5107343 | main connection to the switchboard of
Tuesday, February 08, 2000, 2:48:16 PM, Leif wrote:
wasting space by loading some PIM (or using some bloatware app that
has built in PIM), I see the to-do message every time I open TB.
So why, then, bloat TB!? ;)
However, I've long since been a proponent for user defined message
21 matches
Mail list logo
