Re: Beta/9 Performance Issue

2003-06-09 Thread Zygmunt Wereszczynski
On Saturday, June 7, 2003, at 06:24:17 [UTC-0400] (Saturday, June 7, 2003
12:24 my local time) Bill McCarthy wrote:

snip

BM I retested on 1.62r and didn't see any performance problems for those
BM two cases.  There appears to be some regex evaluation slowdown in the
BM Beta.

The regexp evaluation is untouched and it works as fast as previously. I
think the main sources of problems in such filters with beta8 and beta9 are
the errors in referencing message during its export to the file. All filters
which export message to a text file and simultaneously move this message
to another folder generates bad contents of the file. The Bat! looses
the bounds with selected message during this move. See for example the
message of Marek Mikus (mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]) - this
is the same category of errors!

-- 
Best regards,
Zygmunt Wereszczynski
(Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/7 on Windows 98 4.10 Build  A )



 Current beta is 1.63b9 | Using TBBETA information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Beta/9 Performance Issue

2003-06-07 Thread Bill McCarthy
Hello TB Beta List,

In Add_Reference Now Works posted to the TB Tech List, I presented a
fairly robust solution to rethread messages.  It works with both
In-Reply-To and References block.  There can be none, only one block,
both blocks and they can be anywhere in the message, contiguous or not
and in any order.

I tested it with every possibility I could think of (21 test
messages).

I ran into two problems with Beta/9.  The first is it didn't work for
any of the 21 tests.  Changing the ending `\n\n\z` to `\n\z` had it
working fine in Beta/9 - something changed in Beta/9 wrt, I think,
space at the end of %Header.

The second problem is that, although the macro response quickly in 19
of the tests, 2 were quite slow (around 5 seconds on an 800 Mhz P3).
Those 2 cases never happen (a In-Reply-To block without a References
block and appearing at the start of the header, and a References block
without a In-Reply-To block also appearing at the start of the
header).

I retested on 1.62r and didn't see any performance problems for those
two cases.  There appears to be some regex evaluation slowdown in the
Beta.

-- 
Best regards,
Bill



 Current beta is 1.63b9 | Using TBBETA information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html