Re: Does your CPU support hardware SHA1 acceleration?

2020-05-24 Thread Curt at Down in the Country
Hello Maxim,

Does not support.

 Curt
 Sent from my office desktop by The Bat!
 Using The Bat! Version 9.1.18.6 (ALPHA) (64-bit) Windows 7  (32)
 with HughesNet Gen5 Satellite Internet
 Duetomajor   policy   disagreements,   we   no   longer   use
 turnkeyinternet.net

Tuesday, May 19, 2020, 4:58:15 PM, you wrote:

> Does your CPU support Intel SHA extensions?



'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Does your CPU support hardware SHA1 acceleration?

2020-05-23 Thread NetVicious
martes, 19 may. 2020 at 22:58, it seems you wrote:

> Hello Tbbeta,

> Does your CPU support Intel SHA extensions? These are instructions
> introduced on Intel Goldmont microarchitecture. AMD added support in
> their processors for these instructions starting with Ryzen. There
> are seven new SSE-based instructions, four supporting SHA-1 and three for 
> SHA-256.

Intel i7-6700:

---
SHA1 benchmark
---
This  CPU  does  not  support SHA instructions. 150 data blocks of
1024 bytes took 1.7462 seconds to process by SHA1 (software); 838.8615
Megabytes per second
---
Aceptar   
---

  

-- 
  /\   /  Using  The Bat!  x64 9.1.18 Professional + OTFE 
with iKey1000
 /  \  / \  / Windows (10.0.18363 )
/\/ e t   \/ i c i o u s  Plugins: AntiSpamSniper 3.3.4.4
   
Spanish Translator of The Bat!



'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Does your CPU support hardware SHA1 acceleration?

2020-05-22 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Maxim,

On Tue, 19 May 2020 23:58:15 +0300 GMT (20-May-20, 3:58 +0700 GMT),
Maxim Masiutin via TBBETA wrote:

> You can run The Bat! with /SHA1_BENCHMARK command-line parameter to
> figure out whether your CPU supports SHA1 acceleration instructions, for 
> example:

> thebat64.exe /SHA1_BENCHMARK

Does not.

--

Cheers,
Thomas.

Message reply created with The Bat! Version 9.1.18.2 (BETA) (64-bit)
under Windows 10.0 Build 18362



'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Does your CPU support hardware SHA1 acceleration? (What use the use case in The Bat!?)

2020-05-22 Thread Gwen
Hello Maxim,

On Tue, 19 May 2020, at 23:58:15 [GMT +0300] (which was 22:58 where I
live) Maxim wrote:

> Does your CPU support Intel SHA extensions? These are instructions
> introduced on Intel Goldmont microarchitecture. AMD added support in
> their processors for these instructions starting with Ryzen. There
> are seven new SSE-based instructions, four supporting SHA-1 and three for 
> SHA-256.

SHA1 is a outdated hashing algorithm for data. And its hashing algo is
not really free from vulnerabilities.

I'm just curious. What is it used for in The Bat!? I guess, not for
encryption.

-- 
Regards
Gwen

Using The Bat! Version 9.1.18.6 (ALPHA) (32-bit) on Windows 10.0 (Build 18363 )

pgpIyB11p9mbK.pgp
Description: PGP signature

'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re[2]: Does your CPU support hardware SHA1 acceleration?

2020-05-22 Thread Andrew Savchenko
Hello Gunivortus,

Wednesday, May 20, 2020, 9:21:52 PM, you wrote:

> At my PC I also saw that with data blocks etc,, but considered it
> (being a rooky at that field) as unimportant and so I only took the
> first sentence.

OK, I was starting another instance of TheBat! with the 1st instance 
running in background. As the result, 2nd one was silently crashing 
without producing any output at all.

Maxim,
If you are still reading this topic (which I kind of doubt given the
lack of replies from you), here is the output:

> This CPU does not support SHA instructions. 150 data blocks of
> 1024 bytes took 2.2180 seconds to process by SHA1 (software); 660.4376
> Megabytes per second



-- 
Regards,
A



'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Does your CPU support hardware SHA1 acceleration?

2020-05-22 Thread Gunivortus Goos
Hello Maxim,

here's mine ...

 
SHA1 benchmark

This CPU does not support SHA instructions. 150 data blocks
of 1024 bytes took 1.6372 seconds to process by SHA1 (software);
894.7346 Megabytes per second

-
-- 
Kind regards,
Gunivortus Goos

The Bat! Professional 64 bit, version 9.1.18.3 (BETA)
Windows Pro 64 bit version 10, build nr. 18363
NordVPN vs. 6.27.11.0



'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Does your CPU support hardware SHA1 acceleration?

2020-05-22 Thread Miroslav Florensen
Hello Maxim,

---
SHA1 benchmark
---
This CPU does not support SHA instructions. 150 data blocks of
1024 bytes took 5.9410 seconds to process by SHA1 (software); 246.5652
Megabytes per second
---
OK
---

--
Best wishes
Miroslav

BAT-MAIL.DE.VU - http://thebat.bplaced.net



'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: ***UNCHECKED*** Does your CPU support hardware SHA1 acceleration?

2020-05-22 Thread Maxim Masiutin via TBBETA
Hello Christoph,

Friday, May 22, 2020, 3:14:08 AM, you wrote:

> 150 data blocks of 1024 bytes took 0.8513 seconds to process by
> SHA1 using CPU instructions (hardware), 1720.6420 Megabytes per
> second; 1.9198 seconds to process by software implementation, 763.0005
> Megabytes per second

Wow! How fast!

-- 
Best regards,
Maxim Masiutin



'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: ***UNCHECKED*** Does your CPU support hardware SHA1 acceleration?

2020-05-21 Thread Christoph Koch
Hello list!

* I wrote '[1]:

> Hello Maxim, hello List!

> * Maxim Masiutin via TBBETA wrote '[1]:

>> thebat64.exe /SHA1_BENCHMARK

>> Could you please post your results here? Thank you in advance.

> This is my communication laptop (which is normally running TB!). But I
> can test it on my other computer, too (Ryzen Threadripper 2950X).

Just for fun: here are the results of the AMD Ryzen Threadripper
2950X:

---
SHA1 benchmark
---
150 data blocks of 1024 bytes took 0.8513 seconds to process by
SHA1 using CPU instructions (hardware), 1720.6420 Megabytes per
second; 1.9198 seconds to process by software implementation, 763.0005
Megabytes per second
---
OK   
---




-- 
Regards,
Christoph
TheBat! v9.1.18.6 (ALPHA) unter Windows 10.0 Build 18363  64bit

[1] ~ Nachricht vom: 20.05.2020 @ 18:31:20 +0200 GMT
mid:33252779.20200520183...@christoph-koch.de



'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Does your CPU support hardware SHA1 acceleration?

2020-05-21 Thread MAU
Hello Maxim,

> thebat64.exe /SHA1_BENCHMARK

--- SHA1 benchmark ---
This  CPU  does  not  support SHA instructions. 150 data blocks of
1024 bytes took 1.6875 seconds to process by SHA1 (software); 868.0674
Megabytes per second
---
Aceptar   
---



-- 
Best regards,

Miguel A. Urech (Els Poblets (Alicante - Spain)
Using The Bat!  Version 9.1.18.6 (ALPHA) (64-bit) on Windows 10.0  18363




'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Does your CPU support hardware SHA1 acceleration?

2020-05-21 Thread Dimitar Tomov
On Tuesday, May 19, 2020, 11:58:15 PM, you wrote:

> Hello Tbbeta,

> Does your CPU support Intel SHA extensions? These are instructions
> introduced on Intel Goldmont microarchitecture. AMD added support in
> their processors for these instructions starting with Ryzen. There
> are seven new SSE-based instructions, four supporting SHA-1 and three for 
> SHA-256.


> You can run The Bat! with /SHA1_BENCHMARK command-line parameter to
> figure out whether your CPU supports SHA1 acceleration instructions, for 
> example:

> thebat64.exe /SHA1_BENCHMARK

...

> Could you please post your results here? Thank you in advance.

Dear Maxim,

I hold the record for slowest so far - Intel Core2 Duo T9600 @ 2.80GHz

---
SHA1 benchmark
---
This CPU does not support SHA instructions. 150 data blocks of 1024 bytes 
took 6.2714 seconds to process by SHA1 (software); 233.5752 Megabytes per second
---
OK   
---

Best regards,
Dimitar  mailto:dito...@gmail.com
TheBat! 9.1.18 Pro (64-bit, non-OTFE) on Windows 10.0 14393 



'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Does your CPU support hardware SHA1 acceleration?

2020-05-20 Thread Ethan J. Mings
May 20, 2020

Hello Maxim,

Tuesday, May 19, 2020, 4:58:15 PM, you wrote:

> Does your CPU support Intel SHA extensions? These are instructions introduced 
> on
> Intel Goldmont microarchitecture. AMD added support in their processors for 
> these
> instructions starting with Ryzen. There are seven new SSE-based instructions, 
> four supporting SHA-1 and three for SHA-256.

Mine is an old CPU that is due for an upgrade. It does not support SHA 
extensisons.

Attached is a image file of the results


--  
Ethan J. Mings
President,
The Desk Consulting Group Inc.
Enabling your organization to anticipate the future with confidence!
1-200 North Service Road W. - Suite 311 | Oakville, Ontario, Canada. L6M 2Y1
Phone 905-825-9938 or 1-877-763-7776 | e-mail supportd...@thedesk.ca
Website https://thedesk.ca/main
'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: ***UNCHECKED*** Does your CPU support hardware SHA1 acceleration?

2020-05-20 Thread Christoph Koch
Hello Maxim, hello List!

* Maxim Masiutin via TBBETA wrote '[1]:

> thebat64.exe /SHA1_BENCHMARK

> Could you please post your results here? Thank you in advance.

---
SHA1 benchmark
---
This CPU does not support SHA instructions. 150 data blocks of
1024 bytes took 1.5688 seconds to process by SHA1 (software); 933.7100
Megabytes per second
---
OK   
---

On an Intel i7-8550U

This is my communication laptop (which is normally running TB!). But I
can test it on my other computer, too (Ryzen Threadripper 2950X).


-- 
Regards,
Christoph
TheBat! v9.1.18.6 (ALPHA) unter Windows 10.0 Build 18363  64bit

[1] ~ Nachricht vom: 19.05.2020 @ 23:58:15 +0300 GMT
mid:1734682046.20200519235...@ritlabs.com



'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Does your CPU support hardware SHA1 acceleration?

2020-05-20 Thread jb_lists_tb
On Wednesday, May 20, 2020, 1:18:19 PM, Assad Baroot wrote:

> Mine  is  AMD  Ryzen  7  3700X  Processor. Technically, mine should be
> faster than yours but your cpu has a slightly lower SHA1 processed time.

Interesting, because I also have a Ryzen 7 3700X processor (3.60GHz),
and my times are faster. What is the processor speed?

Mine = 150 data blocks of 1024 bytes took 0.9128 seconds

-- 
   Julian  

   Using The Bat! v9.1.18 on Windows 10.0 Build 18363 




'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Does your CPU support hardware SHA1 acceleration?

2020-05-20 Thread jb_lists_tb
Hello Maxim,

On Tuesday, May 19, 2020, 9:58:15 PM, Maxim Masiutin via TBBETA wrote:

> Does your CPU support Intel SHA extensions? These are instructions
> introduced on Intel Goldmont microarchitecture. AMD added support in
> their processors for these instructions starting with Ryzen. There
> are seven new SSE-based instructions, four supporting SHA-1 and three for 
> SHA-256.

---
SHA1 benchmark
---

150 data blocks of 1024 bytes took 0.9128 seconds to process by
SHA1 using CPU instructions (hardware), 1604.7003 Megabytes per
second; 1.7907 seconds to process by software implementation, 818.0483
Megabytes per second

---
OK
---

This is on a Ryzen 7 3700X 3.60 GHz processor


-- 
   Julian  

   Using The Bat! v9.1.18 on Windows 10.0 Build 18363 




'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Does your CPU support hardware SHA1 acceleration?

2020-05-20 Thread Stuart Cuddy
Hello Assad,
Wednesday, May 20, 2020, 7:18:19 AM, you wrote:

> Mine  is  AMD  Ryzen  7  3700X  Processor. Technically, mine should be
> faster than yours but your cpu has a slightly lower SHA1 processed time.

Must be all the steroids I give it. :>)

-- 
Best regards,
 Stuartmailto:skcu...@fastmail.fm



'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Does your CPU support hardware SHA1 acceleration?

2020-05-20 Thread Stuart Cuddy
Hello Maxim,
Wednesday, May 20, 2020, 12:47:22 AM, you wrote:

> Your CPU is fastest amongst us. What is the exact model/make of your CPU?

AMD Ryzen 5 1600 Six-Core Processor 3.49 GHz

-- 
Best regards,
 Stuartmailto:skcu...@fastmail.fm



'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Does your CPU support hardware SHA1 acceleration?

2020-05-20 Thread Gunivortus Goos
Hello Andrew,

>> This CPU does not support SHA instructions ...etc.

> That was indeed an outdated 3-rd gen i7. However others have reported 
> the following output which I do not see:

At my PC I also saw that with data blocks etc,, but considered it
(being a rooky at that field) as unimportant and so I only took the
first sentence.

>> ---
>> SHA1 benchmark
>> ---
>> This CPU does not support SHA instructions. 150 data blocks of 1024 bytes
>> took 5.6094 seconds to process by SHA1 (software); XXX. Megabytes per 
>> second
>> ---






-- 
Kind regards,
Gunivortus Goos

The Bat! Professional 64 bit, version 9.1.18.3 (BETA)
Windows Pro 64 bit version 10, build nr. 18363
NordVPN vs. 6.27.11.0



'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Does your CPU support hardware SHA1 acceleration?

2020-05-20 Thread Manuel Ostertag
On my "Intel i7-4770 @ 3.4GHz" I get the following message:

---
SHA1 benchmark
---
This CPU does not support SHA instructions.
150 data blocks of 1024 bytes took 1.6252 seconds
to process by SHA1 (software); 901.3555 Megabytes per second
---
OK
---

--
Regards
Manuel

- Original Message -
From: "Maxim Masiutin via TBBETA" 
To: "Manuel Ostertag" 
Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2020 23:58:15 [UTC +0300]
Subject: Does your CPU support hardware SHA1 acceleration?
Msg-Id: 
Priority: (unknown)

Hello Tbbeta,

Does your CPU support Intel SHA extensions? These are instructions introduced 
on Intel Goldmont microarchitecture. AMD added support in their processors for 
these instructions starting with Ryzen. There are seven new SSE-based 
instructions, four supporting SHA-1 and three for SHA-256.


You can run The Bat! with /SHA1_BENCHMARK command-line parameter to figure out 
whether your CPU supports SHA1 acceleration instructions, for example:

thebat64.exe /SHA1_BENCHMARK

On my computer, running The Bat! as above gives the following results:

---
SHA1 benchmark
---
150 data blocks of 1024 bytes took 1.3579 seconds to process by SHA1 using 
CPU instructions (hardware), 1078.7605 Megabytes per second; 2.1496 seconds to 
process by software implementation, 681.4596 Megabytes per second
---
OK
---


Could you please post your results here? Thank you in advance.





'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re[2]: Does your CPU support hardware SHA1 acceleration?

2020-05-20 Thread Andrew Savchenko
Hello Gunivortus,

Wednesday, May 20, 2020, 8:37:09 PM, you wrote:

> This CPU does not support SHA instructions ...etc.

That was indeed an outdated 3-rd gen i7. However others have reported 
the following output which I do not see:

> ---
> SHA1 benchmark
> ---
> This CPU does not support SHA instructions. 150 data blocks of 1024 bytes
> took 5.6094 seconds to process by SHA1 (software); XXX. Megabytes per 
> second
> ---



-- 
Regards,
A



'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Does your CPU support hardware SHA1 acceleration?

2020-05-20 Thread Gunivortus Goos
Hello Maxim,

>> thebat64.exe /SHA1_BENCHMARK

This CPU does not support SHA instructions ...etc.

-- 
Kind regards,
Gunivortus Goos

The Bat! Professional 64 bit, version 9.1.18.3 (BETA)
Windows Pro 64 bit version 10, build nr. 18363
NordVPN vs. 6.27.11.0



'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Does your CPU support hardware SHA1 acceleration?

2020-05-20 Thread Martin
Hi The

On Tuesday, May 19, 2020 10:58:15 PM you wrote:


> Could you please post your results here? Thank you in advance.

---
SHA1 benchmark
---
This CPU does not support SHA instructions. 150 data blocks of 1024 bytes
took 5.6094 seconds to process by SHA1 (software); 261.1415 Megabytes per second
---
OK   
---

-- 
Best regards,
   Martin
   mar...@postzone.org

TheBat! 9.1.18.3 (BETA) Pro (32 with OTFE) on Windows 10.0 18363 



'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Does your CPU support hardware SHA1 acceleration?

2020-05-20 Thread Andrew Savchenko
Hello Maxim,

Wednesday, May 20, 2020, 6:28:15 AM, you wrote:

> thebat64.exe /SHA1_BENCHMARK

Returns nothing to the stdout, tried both PowerShell and "cmd.exe".
v9.1.18, x64. Am I missing something?


-- 
Regards,
A



'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Does your CPU support hardware SHA1 acceleration?

2020-05-20 Thread Petr S.
Hello,
My processor (Intel i7-5930K) does not support SHA instructions.
150  data  blocks  of 1024 bytes took 1.8040 seconds to process by
SHA1 (software): 811.9780 Megabytes per second.


-- 
Best regards,
 Petr S.
 mailto:p_persh...@volny.cz
 TheBat! version: 9.1.18.6 (ALPHA)
on Windows 10 buid 19628

Dobrý den,
úterý 19. května 2020, 22:58:15, napsal jste:

> Hello Tbbeta,

> Does your CPU support Intel SHA extensions? These are instructions
> introduced on Intel Goldmont microarchitecture. AMD added support in
> their processors for these instructions starting with Ryzen. There
> are seven new SSE-based instructions, four supporting SHA-1 and three for 
> SHA-256.


> You can run The Bat! with /SHA1_BENCHMARK command-line parameter to
> figure out whether your CPU supports SHA1 acceleration instructions, for 
> example:

> thebat64.exe /SHA1_BENCHMARK

> On my computer, running The Bat! as above gives the following results:

> ---
> SHA1 benchmark
> ---
> 150 data blocks of 1024 bytes took 1.3579 seconds to process by
> SHA1 using CPU instructions (hardware), 1078.7605 Megabytes per
> second; 2.1496 seconds to process by software implementation, 681.4596 
> Megabytes per second
> ---
> OK   
> ---


> Could you please post your results here? Thank you in advance.







'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Does your CPU support hardware SHA1 acceleration?

2020-05-20 Thread Manuel Ostertag
On my "Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-1650 0 @ 3.20GHz" I get the following
message:

---
SHA1 benchmark
---
This CPU does not support SHA instructions.
150 data blocks of 1024 bytes took 3.0995 seconds
to process by SHA1 (software); 472.6072 Megabytes per second
---
OK
---


--
Regards
Manuel

-

- Original Message -
From: "Maxim Masiutin via TBBETA" 
To: "Manuel Ostertag" 
Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2020 23:58:15 [UTC +0300]
Subject: Does your CPU support hardware SHA1 acceleration?
Msg-Id: 
Priority: (unknown)

Hello Tbbeta,

Does your CPU support Intel SHA extensions? These are instructions introduced 
on Intel Goldmont microarchitecture. AMD added support in their processors for 
these instructions starting with Ryzen. There are seven new SSE-based 
instructions, four supporting SHA-1 and three for SHA-256.


You can run The Bat! with /SHA1_BENCHMARK command-line parameter to figure out 
whether your CPU supports SHA1 acceleration instructions, for example:

thebat64.exe /SHA1_BENCHMARK

On my computer, running The Bat! as above gives the following results:

---
SHA1 benchmark
---
150 data blocks of 1024 bytes took 1.3579 seconds to process by SHA1 using 
CPU instructions (hardware), 1078.7605 Megabytes per second; 2.1496 seconds to 
process by software implementation, 681.4596 Megabytes per second
---
OK
---


Could you please post your results here? Thank you in advance.





'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Does your CPU support hardware SHA1 acceleration?

2020-05-20 Thread Gwen
Hello The,

On Tue, 19 May 2020, at 23:58:15 [GMT +0300] (which was 22:58 where I
live) Maxim wrote:

> Hello Tbbeta,

> Does your CPU support Intel SHA extensions? These are instructions
> introduced on Intel Goldmont microarchitecture. AMD added support in
> their processors for these instructions starting with Ryzen. There
> are seven new SSE-based instructions, four supporting SHA-1 and three for 
> SHA-256.
>
> You can run The Bat! with /SHA1_BENCHMARK command-line parameter to
> figure out whether your CPU supports SHA1 acceleration instructions, for 
> example:
>
> thebat64.exe /SHA1_BENCHMARK

My Intel i5-7500 Does not support.

-- 
Regards
Gwen

Using The Bat! Version 9.1.18.6 (ALPHA) (32-bit) on Windows 10.0 (Build 18363 )

pgppSrycy4Ooa.pgp
Description: PGP signature

'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Does your CPU support hardware SHA1 acceleration?

2020-05-19 Thread Maxim Masiutin via TBBETA
Hello Stuart,

Wednesday, May 20, 2020, 5:06:52 AM, you wrote:

> 150 data blocks of 1024 bytes took 1.0014 seconds to process by SHA1 using
> CPU instructions (hardware), 1462.7576 Megabytes per second; 2.2528 seconds to
> process by software implementation, 650.2314 Megabytes per second

Your CPU is fastest amongst us. What is the exact model/make of your CPU?

-- 
Best regards,
Maxim Masiutin



'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Does your CPU support hardware SHA1 acceleration?

2020-05-19 Thread Gleason




Hello Tbbeta,

Does your CPU support Intel SHA extensions? These are instructions introduced 
on Intel Goldmont microarchitecture. AMD added support in their processors for 
these instructions starting with Ryzen. There are seven new SSE-based 
instructions, four supporting SHA-1 and three for SHA-256.

Does not.





You can run The Bat! with /SHA1_BENCHMARK command-line parameter to figure out 
whether your CPU supports SHA1 acceleration instructions, for example:

thebat64.exe /SHA1_BENCHMARK

On my computer, running The Bat! as above gives the following results:

---
SHA1 benchmark
---
150 data blocks of 1024 bytes took 1.3579 seconds to process by SHA1 using 
CPU instructions (hardware), 1078.7605 Megabytes per second; 2.1496 seconds to 
process by software implementation, 681.4596 Megabytes per second
---
OK
---


Could you please post your results here? Thank you in advance.


--
Best regards,
Maxim Masiutin



'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Does your CPU support hardware SHA1 acceleration?

2020-05-19 Thread Stuart Cuddy
Hello Maxim,
Tuesday, May 19, 2020, 3:58:15 PM, you wrote:

> Does your CPU support Intel SHA extensions? These are instructions introduced
> on Intel Goldmont microarchitecture. AMD added support in their processors for
> these instructions starting with Ryzen. There are seven new SSE-based
> instructions, four supporting SHA-1 and three for SHA-256.

--- SHA1 benchmark --- 

150 data blocks of 1024 bytes took 1.0014 seconds to process by SHA1 using
CPU instructions (hardware), 1462.7576 Megabytes per second; 2.2528 seconds to
process by software implementation, 650.2314 Megabytes per second
--- OK ---


-- 
Best regards,
 Stuartmailto:skcu...@fastmail.fm



'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Does your CPU support hardware SHA1 acceleration?

2020-05-19 Thread Maxim Masiutin via TBBETA
Hello Tbbeta,

Does your CPU support Intel SHA extensions? These are instructions introduced 
on Intel Goldmont microarchitecture. AMD added support in their processors for 
these instructions starting with Ryzen. There are seven new SSE-based 
instructions, four supporting SHA-1 and three for SHA-256.


You can run The Bat! with /SHA1_BENCHMARK command-line parameter to figure out 
whether your CPU supports SHA1 acceleration instructions, for example:

thebat64.exe /SHA1_BENCHMARK

On my computer, running The Bat! as above gives the following results:

---
SHA1 benchmark
---
150 data blocks of 1024 bytes took 1.3579 seconds to process by SHA1 using 
CPU instructions (hardware), 1078.7605 Megabytes per second; 2.1496 seconds to 
process by software implementation, 681.4596 Megabytes per second
---
OK   
---


Could you please post your results here? Thank you in advance.


-- 
Best regards,
Maxim Masiutin



'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html