Hello Vili,
Saturday, October 1, 2005, 10:33:24 PM, you wrote:
How the heck a small, one-product software company can go bankrupt?
No sales?
Cyrus is doubtful, too whether he'll be able to release the code as
open source either. To my mind, the best features of TB and Mulberry
rolled together
On 10/1/2005 at 10:17:23 PM [GMT -0500], Rmorris.R wrote:
I've been running v3.61.09 beta all day without interruption. Things
have been quite fine. No hiccups at all really. The main good point is
that I haven't had to restart because the connection has flaked out on
me.
Have not had any
Hello Curtis,
A reminder of what Curtis typed on:
Sunday, October 02, 2005 at 06:49:37 GMT -0500
C It's now running a full 24 hours uninterrupted and IMAP remains well
C behaved.
C mem usage 24 MB
C Peak mem usage 28MB
C VM usage 35MB
Are you referring here to TB! or Mulberry?
--
Best
On 10/2/2005 at 7:30:10 AM [GMT -0500], Stuart Cuddy wrote:
Are you referring here to TB! or Mulberry?
TB! of course. :)
--
-= Curtis =-
The Bat! v3.61.09 Echo (Beta) / http://specs.aimlink.name
PGPKey: http://rsakey.aimlink.name
...The best way to win an argument is to be right.
Hello Curtis,
A reminder of what Curtis typed on:
Sunday, October 02, 2005 at 08:25:56 GMT -0500
Are you referring here to TB! or Mulberry?
C TB! of course. :)
The problems I still have with IMAP are:
1) Filtering still only works on the first level. In other words if I
have a filter that
On Sunday, October 2, 2005, 8:45:02 AM, Stuart Cuddy wrote:
3) The counts that show are odd and inconsistent. Sometimes the
count will get marked as read after reading the last message and
then get marked as unread and it takes a while to disappear.
Sometimes counts seem to update for no
On 10/2/2005 at 8:45:02 AM [GMT -0500], Stuart Cuddy wrote:
The problems I still have with IMAP are:
1) Filtering still only works on the first level. In other words if I
have a filter that sets the color for TB beta as red and then sets it
to green if it is to or from me it will temporarily
Hello Curtis,
A reminder of what Curtis typed on:
Sunday, October 02, 2005 at 09:42:32 GMT -0500
C This problem is easily avoided by avoiding a double action as you do.
C For instance, for TBBETA:
C Filter one - Header contains 'reply-to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
C AND Header does not
On 10/2/2005 at 10:01:27 AM [GMT -0500], Stuart Cuddy wrote:
OK, but this is where the strangeness begins. I had already set it up
the way you suggest. For some reason the messages after being set to
my color and then get reset to tbbeta color afterwards even though
there is no filter that
Hello Stuart,
Sunday, October 2, 2005, 10:01:27 AM, you wrote:
SC Maybe I will try to reverse the order of my filters to see what that
SC does.
Well I tried this and it still ends up with the tbbeta color. It does
turn green for a while in between, but goes to red after a few
seconds. If I look
Hello Stuart,
Sunday, October 2, 2005, 10:11:17 AM, you wrote:
SC Well I tried this and it still ends up with the tbbeta color. It does
SC turn green for a while in between, but goes to red after a few
SC seconds. If I look in the View log it says it is processed by my
SC filter only and not the
Hi Curtis,
Am Sunday, October 2, 2005, 4:02:19 AM, schriebst du:
I've been running v3.61.09 beta all day without interruption. Things
have been quite fine. No hiccups at all really. The main good point is
that I haven't had to restart because the connection has flaked out on
me.
Connection
In reply to mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
DAC On Sunday, October 2, 2005, 8:45:02 AM, Stuart Cuddy wrote:
3) The counts that show are odd and inconsistent. Sometimes the
[..]
Shouldn't we be talking about the latest beta?
--
Best regards,
Goncalo Farias
The eyes of wolves are flowers fertilized
Hello Goncalo,
Sunday, October 2, 2005, 1:41:27 PM, you wrote:
GF Shouldn't we be talking about the latest beta?
Actually I am. I'm not sure how we changed the subject.
--
Best regards,
Stuartmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've tried this version, but this is the one with the IMAP login
problem (mentioned numerous times on this mailing list.), and thus
it is unusable
I don't have any problems at all with this version - and I'm
collecting from two different IMAP servers, too.
--
Regards,
Clive Taylor
Hello Curtis,
Monday, September 26, 2005, 1:47:54 PM, you wrote:
I don't really note any difference in IMAP of recently. Things
continue to work the same.
Like you, I'm using FastMail as my main email service. It's not my
imagination but the latest betas have been all but unusable
Hello Kevin,
Saturday, September 24, 2005, 8:55:32 PM, you wrote:
I think I'm outta here. Mulberry is just so much more robust when it
comes to IMAP handling.
This was my feeling until I returned from holiday this morning to find
that Cyrusoft and Mulberry have gone into receivership. No more
Hello Clive,
This was my feeling until I returned from holiday this morning to find
that Cyrusoft and Mulberry have gone into receivership. No more
Mulberry by the look of it. Details here: http://www.cyrusoft.com
How the heck a small, one-product software company can go bankrupt? I
mean,
Hi Vili,
On Sat, 1 Oct 2005 23:33:24 +0200 UTC (10/1/2005, 4:33 PM -0500 UTC my
time), Vili wrote:
V How the heck a small, one-product software company can go bankrupt? I
V mean, isnt it possible to sell latest MB anymore to anybody?
there is always more than meets the eye. They had several
On 9/24/2005 at 2:55:32 PM [GMT -0500], Kevin Amazon wrote:
BTW, IMAP IS NOT hard stuff. The RFC is clear and concise and that is
the reason clients such as Thunderbird and Mulberry (and even Outlook)
are pretty flawless at implementation.
I've been running v3.61.09 beta all day without
Hello Curtis,
Saturday, October 1, 2005, 9:02:19 PM, you wrote:
On 9/24/2005 at 2:55:32 PM [GMT -0500], Kevin Amazon wrote:
BTW, IMAP IS NOT hard stuff. The RFC is clear and concise and that is
the reason clients such as Thunderbird and Mulberry (and even Outlook)
are pretty flawless at
On 2005-09-24 at 09:39:18 Clive Taylor wrote:
It's a shame, really. There was just one version (3.60.1) which
performed perfectly here under IMAP
Hmm, I've tried this version, but this is the one with the IMAP login
problem (mentioned numerous times on this mailing list.), and thus it
is
On Monday, September 26, 2005, at 05:31 AM, Dimitry Andric
wrote:
Hmm, I've tried this version, but this is the one with the IMAP login
problem (mentioned numerous times on this mailing list.), and thus it
is unusable... :(
Using a FastMail account. Plain IMAP from work and IMAPs from home.
Hello Keith,
Sunday, September 25, 2005, 10:09:15 PM, you wrote:
KR Unfortunately, following the advice to downgrade to 3.60.1 didn't
KR help me. It appears as though one of the later betas may have
KR made some kind of a configuration change that resulted in this
KR behavior.
I wonder if
Hello Curtis,
Monday, September 26, 2005, 7:47:54 AM, you wrote:
C Using a FastMail account. Plain IMAP from work and IMAPs from home.
I am also using Fastmail and also have a Smarter Mail account through
Gearhost to compare.
C I don't really note any difference in IMAP of recently. Things
C
I wrote:
I also can confirm this problem. While TB! has always been slower
updating than my other clients, it became much worse just a few betas ago.
Unfortunately, following the advice to downgrade to 3.60.1 didn't help
me.
I should say, too, that like Curtis, I am using FastMail. I'm
On Monday, September 26, 2005, at 08:56 AM, Keith Russell
wrote:
I went to bed at 10:30 last night and left The Bat! running. When
I checked my mail at 7:35 this morning, The Bat! showed 10 new
messages in my inbox, with the latest showing a time of 2:19 AM.
I started up Thunderbird, and
On Monday, September 26, 2005, at 07:58 AM, Stuart Cuddy
wrote:
I am also using Fastmail and also have a Smarter Mail account
through Gearhost to compare.
Ok
I have been trying color filtering and it seems to be be
very inconsistent.
I've been labelling messages that are replies
Stuart Cuddy wrote:
GS On Sat, 24 Sep 2005 07:20:16 -0500 GMT(9/24/2005, 7:20 AM -0500 GMT),
GS per mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Stuart Cuddy wrote:
I think I will try to download 3.60.1 if it is
still available, if not does anyone have it still?
GS It is still at
Hello Dwight,
Friday, September 23, 2005, 3:57:59 PM, you wrote:
I would agree with this assessment.
It's a shame, really. There was just one version (3.60.1) which
performed perfectly here under IMAP, all the others have been dogs for
me!
--
Regards,
Clive Taylor
TheBat!:3.60.07
Windows XP:
Hello Clive,
A reminder of what Clive Taylor typed on:
Saturday, September 24, 2005 at 08:39:18 GMT +0100
CT It's a shame, really. There was just one version (3.60.1) which
CT performed perfectly here under IMAP, all the others have been dogs for
CT me!
I knew that one of the past versions
Hello Greg,
A reminder of what Greg Strong typed on:
Saturday, September 24, 2005 at 09:56:04 GMT -0500
GS Hello Stuart,
GS On Sat, 24 Sep 2005 07:20:16 -0500 GMT(9/24/2005, 7:20 AM -0500 GMT),
GS per mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Stuart Cuddy wrote:
I think I will try to download 3.60.1 if it is
Hi Dimitry Andric
-
On Fri, 23 Sep 2005, at 19:35:57 [GMT +0200] (which was 10:35 AM where
I live) you wrote:
On 2005-09-23 at 16:20:42 Clive Taylor wrote:
Usually though, choosing Abort all tasks in Connection Centre kills
these hanging/repeating
The old problems with IMAP mailboxes refusing to update or display
mail without a shutdown or manic clicking on different folders has
returned in recent betas.
This problem makes the new betas unusable for me.
--
Regards,
Clive Taylor
TheBat!:3.60.07
Windows XP: Service Pack 2
On Friday, September 23, 2005, 9:20:42 AM, Clive Taylor wrote:
The old problems with IMAP mailboxes refusing to update or display
mail without a shutdown or manic clicking on different folders has
returned in recent betas.
I would agree with this assessment.
--
Dwight A. Corrin
928 S
Clive and group,
The old problems with IMAP mailboxes refusing to update or display
mail without a shutdown or manic clicking on different folders has
returned in recent betas.
This problem makes the new betas unusable for me.
This has been going on for quite a while. This is what I end up
On 2005-09-23 at 16:20:42 Clive Taylor wrote:
The old problems with IMAP mailboxes refusing to update or display
mail without a shutdown or manic clicking on different folders has
returned in recent betas.
AFAIK, it has never been away since at least 3.0... :( I still also
regularly have the
Dimitry
AFAIK, it has never been away since at least 3.0... :( I still also
regularly have the ever-repeating IMAP tasks, which eat up 100% CPU
time too.
I think this to really be the case.
Usually though, choosing Abort all tasks in Connection Centre kills
these hanging/repeating tasks
38 matches
Mail list logo
