Hello Gunivortus,
Monday, December 10, 2007, 9:23:40 AM, you wrote:
GG Hi Thomas,
Come on! While I also receive newsletters I want to see *with*
pictures, there is no need to use Incredimail! Eudora, Outlook, a
myriad of email clients can do this. Are you pulling our legs?
GG From the
Hello Martin,
Monday, December 10, 2007, 3:40:57 AM, you wrote:
MS Hello Sebastian,
MS Friday, October 12, 2007, 8:39:05 PM, you wrote:
What normal user expect is:
1. HTML templates
2. HTML pictures
MS Yes, that is important. More and more newsletters are not readable
MS without showing
Hello Gleason,
Wednesday, December 5, 2007, 10:33:55 AM, you wrote:
This is just my opinion, but it does seem to me that there is here a
lot of ill will towards Rit, and anger with having to deal with the
brokenness that will appear in betas.
I would agree. Some of the comments made in the
Hi Gleason,
Wednesday, December 5, 2007, 8:33:55 AM, you wrote:
This is just my opinion, but it does seem to me that there is here a
lot of ill will towards Rit, and anger with having to deal with the
brokenness that will appear in betas.
I agree that the Beta list has taken on an
Het was dinsdag 4 december 2007 om 19:44 uur dat jij iets schreef over 'The
Bat! 4.0' :
Hallo Gleason,
What about a roadmap?
GP 2nd time I posted this. Curiouser and curiouser that it is not
GP noticed on the Rit web site and overlooked here
GP
sábado, 10 nov 2007 at 12:55, it seems you wrote:
Your v3 key will work with v4.0.x. New code will need for v4.1.x and
above.
Are u joking, isn't?
--
/\/ Using The Bat! 3.99.29 Professional
/ \ / \ / Windows XP (5.1.2600 Service Pack 2)
/\/ e
Hello Gleason,
Sunday, October 14, 2007, 3:19:49 PM, you scribbled:
GP Yes, as I said a while ago, the success of Tbird is one of the issues
GP that Rit must deal with very soon. And I think glitter is very much a
GP part of Tbird's appeal.
TBird is not glitter. It is a barebones, functional
Hello Gleason,
Saturday, October 13, 2007, 3:08:11 AM, you wrote:
Gary,
my definition of a production environment is that of using a software
product day in and day out individually or within or upon a network of
computers *without* problems.
Yes, that is what IT types want. I understand
Guten Morgen,
GP Again, I don't say that TB's Imap is perfect, just a respectable
GP effort compared to how others have done. And Ritlabs remains
GP commercially viable. I'm impressed.
Indeed. So am I, considering what they are offering as a product.
--
MfG,
Alto
Alto,
Guten Morgen,
MS I'm complaining every six months or so about the company's
MS politics and the priority of issues, bugs and stuff like this and
MS it seems that I am the almost the only one who isn't happy with
MS this.
I'd rephrase that: You're one of the few that haven't given up
Gleason wrote:
TB is the pick, because it is the most well developed Imap
implementation with the most configurable interface, with tolerable html
in email display. It is true that Mulberry's Imap is more complete, but
I don't find it more trouble free.
TheBat!'s IMAP handling is crude and
11 matches
Mail list logo
