Alto,
> Guten Morgen, MS>> I'm complaining every six months or so about the company's MS>> politics and the priority of issues, bugs and stuff like this and MS>> it seems that I am the almost the only one who isn't happy with MS>> this. > I'd rephrase that: You're one of the few that haven't given up yet. > The others do not see it necessary to beg for features that were > guaranteed years ago and have already been payed for. They have > resigned to the fact that they have been ripped off. I guess I am going to have to disagree with that. TB Imap is not perfect, but it is the pick of my list which includes: Thunderbird Mulberry Becky Sylpheed Eudora (and Penelope) Pegasus Gemini Courrier Pocomail TB is the pick, because it is the most well developed Imap implementation with the most configurable interface, with tolerable html in email display. It is true that Mulberry's Imap is more complete, but I don't find it more trouble free. It seems to me that the real issues that TB must confront right now, as a commercial product, are the successes of Thunderbird and Gmail. Thunderbird succeeds, it seems to me, primarily on the basis of flash and glitter. It's email handling tools are years behind many others, which is natural since it has had a lot less time to develop them. So, yes, a little glitter and flash for TB, please. And let's get TB interfaced with Gmail, so users that are attracted to that product find they can enhance it with TB, rather than see TB as a lesser choice. -- Gleason Using 3.99.24 on Windows XP, 5.1, Build 2600. IMAP email provider is Fastmail, which uses Cyrus server software. ________________________________________________________ Current beta is 3.99.24 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
