Hello Thomas,
Chemists convened on Monday, May 3, 2004 at 20:21 GMT +0700 to watch
Thomas Fernandez synthesize:
> We're a philosophical bunch when there are no betas to dissect. ;-)
^^
I think you can omit
Hello Zeflash,
On Mon, 3 May 2004 14:38:33 +0200 GMT (03/05/2004, 19:38 +0700 GMT),
Zeflash wrote:
Z> OK. I didn't know my mail would trigger such a general debate about
Z> the position of TheBat in the mail industry :)
We're a philosophical bunch when there are no betas to dissect. ;-)
Z> I'll
Hello Patrick!
On Sunday, May 2, 2004 at 5:35:39 PM you wrote:
> but anyway, sorry for singing such melodramatic arias ;)
When we are at it: From the Opera beta group it transpires that M2 is
the culprit of most crashes and woes; the browser part is very stable
and rarely encounters bigger troub
Hello Patrick,
Since you guys are all so keen on providing us with your opinions:
Sunday, May 2, 2004, 5:06:06 PM, you wrote:
PE> as i see it, with the event of gmail we will have big changes in the way
^^
Are we talking about the same thing? The beginning
On Sun, 2 May 2004 17:25:32 +0200, Dierk Haasis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Hello Patrick!
On Sunday, May 2, 2004 at 5:06:06 PM you wrote:
a pity, but that's my outlook for the bat on this grey sunday..
That's a nice pun.
huh.. :)) totaly unintended..
but anyway, sorry for singing such melodra
Hello Patrick!
On Sunday, May 2, 2004 at 5:06:06 PM you wrote:
> a pity, but that's my outlook for the bat on this grey sunday..
That's a nice pun.
--
Dierk Haasis
The Bat 2.10.03 on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Service Pack 1
Chat info for ICQ, AIM, MSN, Yahoo, Jabber upon request
If it don't ki
Hello Clive!
On Sunday, May 2, 2004 at 4:51:48 PM you wrote:
> I'm afraid that's over simplistic, Dierk.
Always the semantition (argh), I am: My statement may have been
too close as I only referred to one problem mentioned, the only one I
am actually aware of, that is. But it sure wasn't "si
On Sun, 2 May 2004 10:29:21 -0400, Ethan J. Mings
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I must admit that I don't always follow Ritlabs's marketing
strategies.
Amen.
right. as far as i see, there is no strategy.
I would suggest a much stronger focus on making the product work in a
business environment. T
> I must admit that I don't always follow Ritlabs's marketing
> strategies.
Amen.
I would suggest a much stronger focus on making the product work in a
business environment. The key is make the product work in large
settings where IT departments are looking for applications that work
extremely w
Hello Greg,
On Sun, 2 May 2004 08:32:57 -0500 GMT (02/05/2004, 20:32 +0700 GMT),
Greg Strong wrote:
GS> Are there any market statistics which indicate the importance of IMAP
GS> either presently or with regard to projected future interest?
Not that I know of. But in my limited world of email con
Hello Ethan,
Sunday, May 2, 2004, 2:42:55 PM, you wrote:
EJM> However, as IT specialists in client
EJM> settings continue to tell me
They're the last ones you should listen to, let alone to believe! :-)
--
Best Wishes,
Mark
using
The Bat! Version 2.10.03
MyMacro
Hello Ethan,
Sunday, May 2, 2004, 7:42:55 AM, Ethan J. Mings wrote:
EJM> My proposal, make it work well on the IMAP front and then the market
EJM> will look at the product in a much better way.
Are there any market statistics which indicate the importance of IMAP
either presently or with regard
Hello Jonathan,
>> Excuse my ignorance but, what's a MAPI account?
>
> It's for using with Exchange's native handling of accounts... like
> Outlook :)
Therefor my ignorance, I have never ever used Exchange or Outlook :)
Thanks.
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The
On Wednesday, April 28, 2004, MAU wrote...
>> What kind of accounts? POP3? Or IMAP? Or MAPI? They are 3 very
>> different implementations,...
> Excuse my ignorance but, what's a MAPI account?
It's for using with Exchange's native handling of accounts... like
Outlook :)
--
Jonathan Angliss
([EM
Hello Zeflash,
> As soon as I check an account periodically, memory usage starts to
> grow each time a check happens.
> I can't believe I'm the only one having this problem.
You may be right but I'll have to check more thoroughly tomorrow to
really confirm.
> When checking only 3 accounts each 3
Hello Jonathan,
> What kind of accounts? POP3? Or IMAP? Or MAPI? They are 3 very
> different implementations,...
Excuse my ignorance but, what's a MAPI account?
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v2.10.01
__
On Tuesday, April 27, 2004, Zeflash wrote...
Z>> I take I'm the only one experiencing this problem then? I'm going
Z>> to try on my laptop to see if does it too.
> As soon as I check an account periodically, memory usage starts to
> grow each time a check happens.
> I can't believe I'm the only
17 matches
Mail list logo
