GnuPG support

Hi TBBETA Any news or further information about the fixed GnuPG support of TheBat! The different issues in the bug tracker are open quite a long time. Thanks for information. -- Best regards, Martin mailto:dagob...@yahoo.com TheBat! 10.1.0.2 Pro (with OTFE) on Windows 10.0 19043

Re: GnuPG support in TB - please check!

Martin wrote: > I am running GnuPG 2.2.0 on Windows 7 - and it seems to work with > TheBat! Which issue do you think about? OK. So everybody who filed a bug report under https://bt.ritlabs.com/view_all_bug_page.php (set filter to: gnupg) may check the actual behavior of The Bat! against the

Re: GnuPG support in TB

Hi Gwen On Saturday, September 9, 2017 11:14:15 AM you wrote: > GnuPG 2.2 Works nice with 7.4.16 for me. I am using GnuPG 2.2 on Win 7/32 with TheBat 7.4.16.33 without any problems. -- Best regards, Martin dagob...@yahoo.com TheBat! 7.4.16.33 (ALPHA) Pro (with OTFE) on Windows 7 6.1

Re: GnuPG support in TB

Dear Gwen, --->>> Gwen / Saturday 09-Sep-17, 16:14:15 GnuPG support in TB >> Three days ago GnuPG 2.2.0 was released. This version is a LTE (Long term >> support) version. > GnuPG 2.2 Works nice with 7.4.16 for me. May I ask if you could create a p

Re: GnuPG support in TB

Hello Jörg, On, at [GMT] (which was 09:56 where I live) Joerg wrote: > Three days ago GnuPG 2.2.0 was released. This version is a LTE (Long term > support) version. GnuPG 2.2 Works nice with 7.4.16 for me. -- Regards Gwen Using The Bat! Version 7.4.16 (32-bit) on Windows 10.0 (Build 15063 )

Re: GnuPG support in TB

Hi Joerg On Thursday, August 31, 2017 9:56:00 AM you wrote: > So: Isn't this a good opportunity to fix all issues related to GnuPG 2.x in > The Bat!? I am running GnuPG 2.2.0 on Windows 7 - and it seems to work with TheBat! Which issue do you think about? -- Best regards, Martin

GnuPG support in TB

Hi list! Three days ago GnuPG 2.2.0 was released. This version is a LTE (Long term support) version. See: So: Isn't this a good opportunity to fix all issues related to GnuPG 2.x in The Bat!? -- Best regards, Joerg

Re: GnuPG support still unsufficient

On Sat, 14 May 2005, at 07:32:18 [GMT +0200] (which was 7:32 where I live) Peter Meyns wrote: Hi Peter, HMdB Strange, you know I have a freeform UID and this message is signed HMdB pgp/mime. gpg: Signature made 05/13/05 22:36:22 using DSA key ID 8C32408B gpg: WARNING: signature digest

Re: GnuPG support still unsufficient

Hi Martin, On Sat, 14 May 2005 09:12:27 +0200 (3:12 AM here), Martin Schoch [MS] wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: gpg: Signature made 05/13/05 22:36:22 using DSA key ID 8C32408B gpg: WARNING: signature digest conflict in message gpg: Can't check signature: general error MS Have the same

Re: GnuPG support still unsufficient

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Martin, on Sat, 14 May 2005 09:12:27 +0200GMT, you wrote: HMdB How does the signing go with RC9? HMdB ...snip Again the same error. No way to use PGP/MIME with this address. I can only sign using GPGshell. HMdB Strange, you know I have a

Re: GnuPG support still unsufficient

On Sat, 14 May 2005, at 17:31:40 [GMT +0200] (which was 17:31 where I live) Peter Meyns wrote: ...snip gpg: Signature made 05/13/05 22:36:22 using DSA key ID 8C32408B gpg: WARNING: signature digest conflict in message gpg: Can't check signature: general error MS Have the same message from

Re: GnuPG support still unsufficient

On Sat, 14 May 2005, at 10:55:04 [GMT -0400] (which was 16:55 where I live) Kevin Coates wrote: Hi Kevin, ...snip gpg: Signature made 05/13/05 22:36:22 using DSA key ID 8C32408B gpg: WARNING: signature digest conflict in message gpg: Can't check signature: general error MS Have the same

Re: GnuPG support still unsufficient

On Thu, 12 May 2005, at 18:06:18 [GMT +0200] (which was 18:06 where I live) Peter Meyns wrote: ...snip I also tried OpenPGP. No difference. Same error, no matter what I select. Hi Peter, How does the signing go with RC9? I did some tests with different UID's and I as far as I can see now, I

Re: GnuPG support still unsufficient

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 On Fri, 13 May 2005, at 08:45:57 [GMT +0200] (which was 8:45 where I live) Henk de Bruijn wrote: On Thu, 12 May 2005, at 18:06:18 [GMT +0200] (which was 18:06 where I live) Peter Meyns wrote: ...snip I also tried OpenPGP. No difference.

Re: GnuPG support still unsufficient

Hallo Peter, On Fri, 13 May 2005 17:42:34 +0200GMT (13-5-2005, 17:42 +0200, where I live), you wrote: PM Again the same error. No way to use PGP/MIME with this address. Works fine for me -- Groetjes, Roelof The characters in this message are recyclable The Bat! 3.5 Return RC9 Windows XP 5.1

Re: GnuPG support still unsufficient

Hi Roelof, on Fri, 13 May 2005 18:55:07 +0200GMT, you wrote: PM Again the same error. No way to use PGP/MIME with this address. RO Works fine for me I see it and I believe it. But still I don't understand why it doesn't work here. Not even on this rather freshly set up notebook... hmm --

Re: GnuPG support still unsufficient

On Fri, 13 May 2005, at 17:42:34 [GMT +0200] (which was 17:42 where I live) Peter Meyns wrote: Hi Peter, HMdB How does the signing go with RC9? ...snip Again the same error. No way to use PGP/MIME with this address. I can only sign using GPGshell. Strange, you know I have a freeform UID and

Re: GnuPG support still unsufficient

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Henk, on Fri, 13 May 2005 22:36:22 +0200GMT, you wrote: HMdB How does the signing go with RC9? HMdB ...snip Again the same error. No way to use PGP/MIME with this address. I can only sign using GPGshell. HMdB Strange, you know I have a

Re: GnuPG support still unsufficient

Hi Peter, On Thu, 12 May 2005 07:53:27 +0200 (1:53 AM here), Peter Meyns [PM] wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: PM It is set to none here. Still, this is the answer, when I try to PM sign from within TB!: PM gpg: key 9E19BFC2: secret key without public key - skipped gpg: no PM default secret key:

Re: GnuPG support still unsufficient

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Kevin, on Thu, 12 May 2005 02:30:49 -0400GMT, you wrote: PM It is set to none here. Still, this is the answer, when I try to PM sign from within TB!: KC Try setting it for pgp8. I also tried OpenPGP. No difference. Same error, no matter what I

GnuPG support still unsufficient

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 Hi all, on Thu, 24 Feb 2005 23:36:33 +0100GMT, I wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : PM ... The problem is, that The Bat! doesn't recognize other UIDs PM than the first. ... It is probably related to BT entry PM

Re: GnuPG support still unsufficient

Dear Peter, @11-May-2005, 22:05 +0200 (11-May 21:05 UK time) Peter Meyns [PM] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Peter: PM ... The problem is, that The Bat! doesn't recognize other UIDs PM than the first. ... It is probably related to BT entry PM http://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4171 PM This

Re: GnuPG support still unsufficient

On Wed, 11 May 2005, at 22:45:42 [GMT +0100] (which was 23:45 where I live) Marck D Pearlstone wrote: PM ... The problem is, that The Bat! doesn't recognize other UIDs PM than the first. ... It is probably related to BT entry PM http://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4171 PM This old bug still

Re: GnuPG support still unsufficient

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 Hi Marck, on Wed, 11 May 2005 22:45:42 +0100GMT, you wrote: PM ... The problem is, that The Bat! doesn't recognize other UIDs PM than the first. ... It is probably related to BT entry PM http://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4171 PM This old