GnuPG support

2022-09-13 Thread Martin
Hi TBBETA

Any news or further information about the fixed GnuPG support of 
TheBat! The different issues in the bug tracker are open quite a long 
time.

Thanks for information.

-- 
Best regards,
  Martin mailto:dagob...@yahoo.com

TheBat! 10.1.0.2 Pro (with OTFE) on Windows 10.0 19043 



'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: GnuPG support in TB - please check!

2017-09-11 Thread Joerg Schiermeier
Martin wrote:

> I am running GnuPG 2.2.0 on Windows 7 - and it seems to work with
> TheBat! Which issue do you think about?

OK. So everybody who filed a bug report under

https://bt.ritlabs.com/view_all_bug_page.php
(set filter to: gnupg)

may check the actual behavior of The Bat! against the reported errors again 
please. So RitLabs can track down this issues if they still exists.

A reliable signing and encryption system in a mail program is a crucial 
feature!

Thank you!

-- 
Best regards,

Joerg Schiermeier
Bielefeld, Germany
--
productive: The Bat! pro v7 (32bit) - wine(at)Debian64
test environment (32bit + 64bit): The Bat! pro - latest beta




 Current beta is 7.4.16.45 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: GnuPG support in TB

2017-09-10 Thread Martin
Hi Gwen

On Saturday, September 9, 2017 11:14:15 AM you wrote:

> GnuPG 2.2 Works nice with 7.4.16 for me.

I am using GnuPG 2.2 on Win 7/32 with TheBat 7.4.16.33 without any
problems.

-- 
Best regards,
   Martin
   dagob...@yahoo.com

TheBat! 7.4.16.33 (ALPHA) Pro (with OTFE) on Windows 7 6.1 7601 Service Pack 1

pgpcTD59v_kFA.pgp
Description: PGP signature

 Current beta is 7.4.16.45 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: GnuPG support in TB

2017-09-09 Thread Eddie
Dear Gwen,

 --->>> Gwen / Saturday 09-Sep-17, 16:14:15
    GnuPG support in TB


>> Three days ago GnuPG 2.2.0 was released. This version is a LTE (Long term
>> support) version.

> GnuPG 2.2 Works nice with 7.4.16 for me.

May   I   ask  if  you  could  create  a post here easy to achieve and
access(due to it's completeness) with   all  relevant  informations
and  links  (e.g. Websites, forums, Learning sites, English as well as
German if you have, etc.) on the topic of GnuPG?

Users  wanting  to  dive  into this topic would then be able to have a
helping hand when used with TB! and also as a starting aid too.

That  would  be  a  great help and a big thanks in advance for such an
effort.

-- 
   best regards | Using The Bat! Version 7.4.16.13 (BETA) (32-bit)
   Eddie | on Windows 7 6.1
 | Build 7601 Service Pack 1



 Current beta is 7.4.16.45 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: GnuPG support in TB

2017-09-09 Thread Gwen
Hello Jörg,
On, at  [GMT] (which was 09:56 where I live) Joerg wrote:

> Three days ago GnuPG 2.2.0 was released. This version is a LTE (Long term
> support) version.

GnuPG 2.2 Works nice with 7.4.16 for me.

-- 
Regards
Gwen

Using The Bat! Version 7.4.16 (32-bit) on Windows 10.0 (Build 15063 )

pgpaJpldoixhx.pgp
Description: PGP signature

 Current beta is 7.4.16.45 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: GnuPG support in TB

2017-08-31 Thread Martin
Hi Joerg

On Thursday, August 31, 2017 9:56:00 AM you wrote:

> So: Isn't this a good opportunity to fix all issues related to GnuPG 2.x in
> The Bat!?

I am running GnuPG 2.2.0 on Windows 7 - and it seems to work with
TheBat! Which issue do you think about?

-- 
Best regards,
   Martin
   dagob...@yahoo.com

TheBat! 7.4.16.33 (ALPHA) Pro (with OTFE) on Windows 7 6.1 7601 Service Pack 1

pgpcacia8SmwM.pgp
Description: PGP signature

 Current beta is 7.4.16.45 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


GnuPG support in TB

2017-08-31 Thread Joerg Schiermeier
Hi list!

Three days ago GnuPG 2.2.0 was released. This version is a LTE (Long term 
support) version.
See: 

So: Isn't this a good opportunity to fix all issues related to GnuPG 2.x in 
The Bat!?

-- 
Best regards,

Joerg Schiermeier
Bielefeld, Germany
--
productive: The Bat! pro v7 (32bit) - wine(at)Debian64
test environment (32bit + 64bit): The Bat! pro - latest beta




 Current beta is 7.4.16.45 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: GnuPG support still unsufficient

2005-05-14 Thread Henk M. de Bruijn
On Sat, 14 May 2005, at 07:32:18 [GMT +0200] (which was 7:32 where I
live) Peter Meyns wrote:

Hi Peter,

HMdB Strange, you know I have a freeform UID and this message is signed
HMdB pgp/mime.

 gpg: Signature made 05/13/05 22:36:22 using DSA key ID 8C32408B
 gpg: WARNING: signature digest conflict in message
 gpg: Can't check signature: general error

 Nor can I sign using TB!...

Hmmm, I don't know what's happening, this is in the headers of my
received message:

   ,-GnuPG output follows (current time: Fri, May 13 2005 - 22:41:26)--
|
| armor header: Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MingW32)
| Signature made 05/13/05 22:36:22 using DSA key ID 8C32408B
| using PGP trust model
| Good signature from Henk M. de Bruijn
| aka Henk M. de Bruijn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| aka Henk M. de Bruijn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| aka GSWoT:31:15:8C32408B
| textmode signature, digest algorithm RIPEMD160
|
`---

-- 
cheers,
Henk
__
The Bat! Natural E-Mail System version 3.5 Pro on Windows XP SP2
Request-PGP: http://www.biglumber.com/x/web?qs=0x6C9F6CE78C32408B
Gossamer Spider Web of Trust http://www.gswot.org
A progressive and innovative Web of Trust

pgpMq4Y1ufmhz.pgp
Description: PGP signature

 Current beta is (none) | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Re: GnuPG support still unsufficient

2005-05-14 Thread Kevin Coates
Hi Martin,

On Sat, 14 May 2005 09:12:27 +0200 (3:12 AM here), Martin Schoch [MS]
wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 gpg: Signature made 05/13/05 22:36:22 using DSA key ID 8C32408B
 gpg: WARNING: signature digest conflict in message
 gpg: Can't check signature: general error

MS Have the same message from GnuPG 1.4.1 when checking the message
MS from Henk.

This is another bug in The Bat!. Messages created using the default
digest-algo SHA1 will verify. If one changes their digest-algo to
RIPEMD160, TB users will receive the error message above.

RIPEMD160 messages are not a problem for GPGrelay, Enigmail. This
needs to be fixed.

-- 
Kevin Coates
Dewitt, NY USA

Using TB! v3.5 under Windows XP 5.1.2600 SP2

(see kludges for my pgp key)

pgpBYdjOvS4Na.pgp
Description: PGP signature

 Current beta is (none) | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Re: GnuPG support still unsufficient

2005-05-14 Thread Peter Meyns
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi Martin,

on Sat, 14 May 2005 09:12:27 +0200GMT, you wrote:

HMdB How does the signing go with RC9?
HMdB ...snip

 Again the same error. No way to use PGP/MIME with this address. I can
 only sign using GPGshell.

HMdB Strange, you know I have a freeform UID and this message is signed
HMdB pgp/mime.

 gpg: Signature made 05/13/05 22:36:22 using DSA key ID 8C32408B
 gpg: WARNING: signature digest conflict in message
 gpg: Can't check signature: general error

MS Have the same message from GnuPG 1.4.1 when checking the message
MS from Henk.

It is a known bug. See https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4329

- -- 
Cheers
Peter

The Bat! v3.5 on Win2K, SP4, 5, 0, build 2195,
AMD Athlon 2200+ at 1794 MHz, 512 MB RAM
'
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MingW32) - GPGshell v3.32
Comment: Gossamer Spider Web of Trust: http://www.gswot.org
Comment: My key: https://www.biglumber.com/x/web?qs=0xE10774CE

iD8DBQFChhnTAzZSBuEHdM4RAgN1AJsFt58Cbxke904U6/K+tKRvjTUZ4QCfRupJ
HSj3+uyF0lNClPFidX4mElQ=
=oVVS
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




 Current beta is (none) | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: GnuPG support still unsufficient

2005-05-14 Thread Henk M. de Bruijn
On Sat, 14 May 2005, at 17:31:40 [GMT +0200] (which was 17:31 where I
live) Peter Meyns wrote:

...snip

 gpg: Signature made 05/13/05 22:36:22 using DSA key ID 8C32408B
 gpg: WARNING: signature digest conflict in message
 gpg: Can't check signature: general error

MS Have the same message from GnuPG 1.4.1 when checking the message
MS from Henk.

 It is a known bug. See https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4329

Ok guys, I have set my settings back to SHA1 and added a note to:
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4329

-- 
Henk M. de Bruijn
__
The Bat! Natural E-Mail System version 3.5 Pro on Windows XP SP2
Request-PGP: http://www.biglumber.com/x/web?qs=0x6C9F6CE78C32408B
Gossamer Spider Web of Trust http://www.gswot.org
A progressive and innovative Web of Trust

pgpCqYJ57wnIi.pgp
Description: PGP signature

 Current beta is (none) | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Re: GnuPG support still unsufficient

2005-05-14 Thread Henk M. de Bruijn
On Sat, 14 May 2005, at 10:55:04 [GMT -0400] (which was 16:55 where I
live) Kevin Coates wrote:

Hi Kevin,

...snip

 gpg: Signature made 05/13/05 22:36:22 using DSA key ID 8C32408B
 gpg: WARNING: signature digest conflict in message
 gpg: Can't check signature: general error

MS Have the same message from GnuPG 1.4.1 when checking the message
MS from Henk.

 This is another bug in The Bat!. Messages created using the default
 digest-algo SHA1 will verify. If one changes their digest-algo to
 RIPEMD160, TB users will receive the error message above.

 RIPEMD160 messages are not a problem for GPGrelay, Enigmail. This
 needs to be fixed.

Please add a note at:
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4329

-- 
Henk M. de Bruijn
__
The Bat! Natural E-Mail System version 3.5 Pro on Windows XP SP2
Request-PGP: http://www.biglumber.com/x/web?qs=0x6C9F6CE78C32408B
Gossamer Spider Web of Trust http://www.gswot.org
A progressive and innovative Web of Trust

pgpQBNaECHAAq.pgp
Description: PGP signature

 Current beta is (none) | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Re: GnuPG support still unsufficient

2005-05-13 Thread Henk M. de Bruijn
On Thu, 12 May 2005, at 18:06:18 [GMT +0200] (which was 18:06 where I
live) Peter Meyns wrote:

...snip

 I also tried OpenPGP. No difference. Same error, no matter what I
 select.

Hi Peter,

How does the signing go with RC9? I did some tests with different
UID's and I as far as I can see now, I don't have anymore problems. I
tested with signing without using GPGshell and experienced no more
problems neither with clearsigning nor with pgp/mime from the
editormenu and from a template.

-- 
Henk
__
The Bat! Natural E-Mail System version 3.5 RC9 Pro on Windows XP SP2
Request-PGP: http://www.biglumber.com/x/web?qs=0x6C9F6CE78C32408B
Gossamer Spider Web of Trust http://www.gswot.org
A progressive and innovative Web of Trust

pgp6yubSwZpb0.pgp
Description: PGP signature

 Current beta is 3.5 Return RC/9 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Re: GnuPG support still unsufficient

2005-05-13 Thread Henk M. de Bruijn
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160

On Fri, 13 May 2005, at 08:45:57 [GMT +0200] (which was 8:45 where I
live) Henk de Bruijn wrote:

 On Thu, 12 May 2005, at 18:06:18 [GMT +0200] (which was 18:06 where I
 live) Peter Meyns wrote:

 ...snip

 I also tried OpenPGP. No difference. Same error, no matter what I
 select.

 Hi Peter,

 How does the signing go with RC9? I did some tests with different
 UID's and I as far as I can see now, I don't have anymore problems. I
 tested with signing without using GPGshell and experienced no more
 problems neither with clearsigning nor with pgp/mime from the
 editormenu and from a template.

Signed ;-)

- --
Henk M. de Bruijn
__
The Bat! Natural E-Mail System version 3.5 RC9 Pro on Windows XP SP2
Request-PGP: http://www.biglumber.com/x/web?qs=0x6C9F6CE78C32408B
Gossamer Spider Web of Trust http://www.gswot.org
A progressive and innovative Web of Trust
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MingW32)

iD8DBQFChE3sbJ9s54wyQIsRA164AKCPrQ48PUyZpgpuZq9BReGTPSe89gCdGBSY
jNr2CSBN4DrAPQuIf3UZ76w=
=k6Ky
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




 Current beta is 3.5 Return RC/9 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: GnuPG support still unsufficient

2005-05-13 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Peter,

On Fri, 13 May 2005 17:42:34 +0200GMT (13-5-2005, 17:42 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:

PM Again the same error. No way to use PGP/MIME with this address.

Works fine for me

-- 
Groetjes, Roelof

The characters in this message are recyclable

The Bat! 3.5 Return RC9
Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2
1 pop3 account, server on LAN



pgpihbJLr6JbU.pgp
Description: PGP signature

 Current beta is 3.5 Return RC/9 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Re: GnuPG support still unsufficient

2005-05-13 Thread Peter Meyns
Hi Roelof,

on Fri, 13 May 2005 18:55:07 +0200GMT, you wrote:

PM Again the same error. No way to use PGP/MIME with this address.

RO Works fine for me

I see it and I believe it. But still I don't understand why it doesn't
work here. Not even on this rather freshly set up notebook... hmm

-- 
Cheers
Peter

The Bat! v3.5 Return RC7 :beta: on Win2K, SP4, 5, 0, build 2195,
Dell Latitude C600 P3 at 1012 MHz, 512 MB RAM




 Current beta is 3.5 Return RC/9 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: GnuPG support still unsufficient

2005-05-13 Thread Henk M. de Bruijn
On Fri, 13 May 2005, at 17:42:34 [GMT +0200] (which was 17:42 where I
live) Peter Meyns wrote:

Hi Peter,

HMdB How does the signing go with RC9?
...snip

 Again the same error. No way to use PGP/MIME with this address. I can
 only sign using GPGshell.

Strange, you know I have a freeform UID and this message is signed
pgp/mime.

I am not using GPGrelay in this case but my TBBETA-template.

-- 
cheers,
Henk
__
The Bat! Natural E-Mail System version 3.5 RC9 Pro on Windows XP SP2
Request-PGP: http://www.biglumber.com/x/web?qs=0x6C9F6CE78C32408B
Gossamer Spider Web of Trust http://www.gswot.org
A progressive and innovative Web of Trust

pgptPkZ2kANdR.pgp
Description: PGP signature

 Current beta is 3.5 Return RC/9 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Re: GnuPG support still unsufficient

2005-05-13 Thread Peter Meyns
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi Henk,

on Fri, 13 May 2005 22:36:22 +0200GMT, you wrote:

HMdB How does the signing go with RC9?
HMdB ...snip

 Again the same error. No way to use PGP/MIME with this address. I can
 only sign using GPGshell.

HMdB Strange, you know I have a freeform UID and this message is signed
HMdB pgp/mime.

gpg: Signature made 05/13/05 22:36:22 using DSA key ID 8C32408B
gpg: WARNING: signature digest conflict in message
gpg: Can't check signature: general error

Nor can I sign using TB!...

- -- 
Cheers
Peter

The Bat! v3.5 :beta: on Win2K, SP4, 5, 0, build 2195,
AMD Athlon 2200+ at 1794 MHz, 512 MB RAM
'
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MingW32) - GPGshell v3.32
Comment: Gossamer Spider Web of Trust: http://www.gswot.org
Comment: My key: https://www.biglumber.com/x/web?qs=0xE10774CE

iD8DBQFChY0tAzZSBuEHdM4RAhhIAKCYqKIIJ6bnXBusfaYVboILRHtE8wCfdifa
h/skepCkQKp7y6/fnWqPwws=
=22Bp
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




 Current beta is (none) | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: GnuPG support still unsufficient

2005-05-12 Thread Kevin Coates
Hi Peter,

On Thu, 12 May 2005 07:53:27 +0200 (1:53 AM here), Peter Meyns [PM]
wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:

PM It is set to none here. Still, this is the answer, when I try to
PM sign from within TB!:

PM gpg: key 9E19BFC2: secret key without public key - skipped gpg: no
PM default secret key: secret key not available gpg: [stdin]:
PM clearsign failed: secret key not available

Try setting it for pgp8.

-- 
Kevin Coates
Dewitt, NY USA

Using TB! v3.5 Return RC8 under Windows XP 5.1.2600 SP2

(see kludges for my pgp key)

pgplw9Xb0ea0z.pgp
Description: PGP signature

 Current beta is 3.5 Return RC/8 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Re: GnuPG support still unsufficient

2005-05-12 Thread Peter Meyns
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi Kevin,

on Thu, 12 May 2005 02:30:49 -0400GMT, you wrote:

PM It is set to none here. Still, this is the answer, when I try to
PM sign from within TB!:

KC Try setting it for pgp8.

I also tried OpenPGP. No difference. Same error, no matter what I
select.

- -- 
Cheers
Peter

The Bat! v3.5 Return RC8 :beta: on Win2K, SP4, 5, 0, build 2195,
Dell Latitude C600 P3 at 1012 MHz, 512 MB RAM
'

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MingW32) - GPGshell v3.42
Comment: Gossamer Spider Web of Trust: http://www.gswot.org
Comment: My key: https://www.biglumber.com/x/web?qs=0xE10774CE

iD8DBQFCg37wAzZSBuEHdM4RAkKGAKDNVJYGUL8yREhQttgxHV6OKlzMBACg4PyF
Q7jvDB6Ai97tmIWZ3IlMwxI=
=+IKY
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




 Current beta is 3.5 Return RC/8 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


GnuPG support still unsufficient

2005-05-11 Thread Peter Meyns
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160

Hi all,

on Thu, 24 Feb 2005 23:36:33 +0100GMT, I wrote in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :

PM ... The problem is, that The Bat! doesn't recognize other UIDs
PM than the first. ... It is probably related to BT entry
PM http://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4171

This old bug still exists in current versions. So I'll use GPGshell
again instead of TB!'s implementation. :-(

- -- 
Cheers
Peter

The Bat! v3.5 Return RC7 :beta: on Win2K, SP4, 5, 0, build 2195,
AMD Athlon 2200+ at 1794 MHz, 512 MB RAM
'
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MingW32) - GPGshell v3.32
Comment: Gossamer Spider Web of Trust: http://www.gswot.org
Comment: My key: https://www.biglumber.com/x/web?qs=0xE10774CE

iD8DBQFCgmVsAzZSBuEHdM4RA3v1AKDqLvghQMm4vC9HvBq2YgH7oPfZFgCgy/dZ
Ukdhrs04ednGba2/YA/4MfA=
=k//U
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




 Current beta is 3.5 Return RC/7 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: GnuPG support still unsufficient

2005-05-11 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Dear Peter,

@11-May-2005, 22:05 +0200 (11-May 21:05 UK time) Peter Meyns [PM] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Peter:

PM ... The problem is, that The Bat! doesn't recognize other UIDs
PM than the first. ... It is probably related to BT entry
PM http://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4171

PM This old bug still exists in current versions. So I'll use GPGshell
PM again instead of TB!'s implementation. :-(

I only found this to be the case when using GnuPG's OpenPGP
compatibility setting. I can use all UIDs when setting compatibility
to None.

-- 
Cheers --  //.arck D Pearlstone -- List moderator and fellow end user
TB! v3.5 Return RC8 on Windows XP 5.1.2600 Service Pack 2
'

pgppYESJxudMV.pgp
Description: PGP signature

 Current beta is 3.5 Return RC/8 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Re: GnuPG support still unsufficient

2005-05-11 Thread Henk M. de Bruijn
On Wed, 11 May 2005, at 22:45:42 [GMT +0100] (which was 23:45 where I
live) Marck D Pearlstone wrote:

PM ... The problem is, that The Bat! doesn't recognize other UIDs
PM than the first. ... It is probably related to BT entry
PM http://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4171

PM This old bug still exists in current versions. So I'll use GPGshell
PM again instead of TB!'s implementation. :-(

 I only found this to be the case when using GnuPG's OpenPGP
 compatibility setting. I can use all UIDs when setting compatibility
 to None.

I had mine set to pgp8, have changed that to None now, see if this
works ;-)

--
cheers,
Henk M. de Bruijn
__
The Bat! Natural E-Mail System version 3.5 RC8 Pro on Windows XP SP2
Request-PGP: http://www.biglumber.com/x/web?qs=0x6C9F6CE78C32408B
Gossamer Spider Web of Trust http://www.gswot.org
A progressive and innovative Web of Trust



pgpzSVRQTEmxX.pgp
Description: PGP signature

 Current beta is 3.5 Return RC/8 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Re: GnuPG support still unsufficient

2005-05-11 Thread Peter Meyns
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160

Hi Marck,

on Wed, 11 May 2005 22:45:42 +0100GMT, you wrote:

PM ... The problem is, that The Bat! doesn't recognize other UIDs
PM than the first. ... It is probably related to BT entry
PM http://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4171

PM This old bug still exists in current versions. So I'll use GPGshell
PM again instead of TB!'s implementation. :-(

MDP I only found this to be the case when using GnuPG's OpenPGP
MDP compatibility setting. I can use all UIDs when setting compatibility
MDP to None.

It is set to none here. Still, this is the answer, when I try to
sign from within TB!:

gpg: key 9E19BFC2: secret key without public key - skipped
gpg: no default secret key: secret key not available
gpg: [stdin]: clearsign failed: secret key not available

- -- 
Cheers
Peter

The Bat! v3.5 Return RC8 :beta: on Win2K, SP4, 5, 0, build 2195,
AMD Athlon 2200+ at 1794 MHz, 512 MB RAM
'
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MingW32) - GPGshell v3.32
Comment: Gossamer Spider Web of Trust: http://www.gswot.org
Comment: My key: https://www.biglumber.com/x/web?qs=0xE10774CE

iD8DBQFCgu80AzZSBuEHdM4RA8SxAKCS7ckx8iPJakgZVSV+yoUXcDDlgACg155V
rDzaSkePh83g/8eYSA+g4Oc=
=OgPt
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




 Current beta is 3.5 Return RC/8 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/