Hello TBBETA,
I'm seeing huge memory usage by TB!
Virtual Memory 1GB, working set 478K
Anyone else seeing this?
--
Best regards,
Tony mailto:t...@parkinch.co.uk
The Bat! 5.3.2.2 (BETA) with IMAP on Windows XP 5.1.Service Pack 3 Build: 2600
I have had this error twice today, once when shutting down and just now when
running the maintenance center. There are no log entries
---
Application Error
---
Exception ECriticalSectionsLeak in module tbmapi.dll at 000116F5. Resource
leak: 2
So, as I wrote earlier, my VM runs up when reply to a mail. I managed
to track down to the Reply template.
So, if my reply template is empty, %BLANK, replying a mail will not
really increase the VM size.
BUT: if I have a simple
%QUOTES
%CURSOR
Vili
reply template, then replying to a 3-line
Kertész Vilmos wrote on 19/04/2008 at 23:26:50 +1100
subject Memory leak, 2. (WAS Video Issue?) :
Ok, I found the cause of the HUGE VM size and I think the slowdowns:
- start TB. It is like 50 MB VM at me.
- open the Mail Editor to write a mail
The size of the VM shoots up to 125 MB
the cause yet.
BUT: monitor the VM in the Task Manager, and open/close an email that
has online images in it. You may see that the size of the VM
increases. Not that much, but there is a memory leak. Also, at some
mail with online content, I dont see VM increase.
We should test which HTML
Ok, I found the cause of the HUGE VM size and I think the slowdowns:
- start TB. It is like 50 MB VM at me.
- open the Mail Editor to write a mail
The size of the VM shoots up to 125 MB... It is not lowered when I
send the mail or close the mail editor.
Isnt it a little too much
Ok, I found the cause of the HUGE VM size and I think the slowdowns:
- start TB. It is like 50 MB VM at me.
- open the Mail Editor to write a mail
The size of the VM shoots up to 125 MB... It is not lowered when I
send the mail or close the mail editor.
Isnt it a little too much
Hello Rick,
Ok, I found the cause of the HUGE VM size and I think the slowdowns:
- start TB. It is like 50 MB VM at me.
- open the Mail Editor to write a mail
The size of the VM shoots up to 125 MB... It is not lowered when I
send the mail or close the mail editor.
Isnt it a little too
[Reply to: »Jan Rifkinson« · 2008-03-14 · 21:14 h (CET)]
Moin, Jan!
Has anyone noted a memory leak in the current betas? Trying to track
something down.
Quite the contrary – v4.0.x is much better than the v3.99.x in this
point.
At the moment (running some hours) 15MB RAM/61MB virtual Memory
On Friday, March 14, 2008, 20:46:35, Volker Ahrendt wrote:
At the moment (running some hours) 15MB RAM/61MB virtual Memory,
minimized 3MB/61MB.
Hint: when a program is minimised it doesn't use any less memory,
Windows only swaps most of it's working set out to swap file.
--
Jernej Simončič
and predecessors did.
Thanks for your note on the memory leak. I'll wait for version 4.0 to
see if it addresses memory use.
Jerry
--
Best regards,
Ethanmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Current beta is 3.99.29 | 'Using
Hello Ethan,
Sunday, November 25, 2007, 3:47:23 PM, you wrote:
EJM Can anyone verify this problem?
I can't look for the reason, I can only confirm that this .25 version also
uses more memory than (seems) necessary and predecessors did.
--
Best Wishes,
Mark
using
Hello Ethan,
Sunday, November 25, 2007, 8:47:23 AM, you scribbled:
EJM Sunday, November 25, 2007
EJM I continue to experience some sort of memory leak with the current
EJM official version of The Bat. After about half of a day of use, it
EJM moves from 57, 232 K to just under 180, 000K. Even
Sunday, November 25, 2007
I continue to experience some sort of memory leak with the current
official version of The Bat. After about half of a day of use, it
moves from 57, 232 K to just under 180, 000K. Even when I minimize the
program, it still continues to escalate.
Can anyone verify
I continue to experience some sort of memory leak with the current
official version of The Bat. After about half of a day of use, it
moves from 57, 232 K to just under 180, 000K. Even when I minimize the
program, it still continues to escalate.
Can anyone verify this problem? By the way, I
Hello Marek,
On Tuesday, April 17, 2007 at 12:20:38 PM Marek [MM] wrote:
MM Hello all,
MM Tuesday, April 17, 2007, Roelof Otten wrote:
MP The screenshot shows Bat's memory usage on my computer after a couple
MP of hours running. First column is Mem Usage, second is VM Size. Yes,
MP that is well
·---·-Date---·
| QA mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [1] | 2007-04-18 |
·---··
[Reply to: »Volker Ahrendt« · 2007-04-17 · 17:49 h (CET)]
The screenshot shows Bat's memory usage on my
Tuesday, April 17, 2007, 6:11:25 AM, you wrote:
The screenshot shows Bat's memory usage on my computer after a couple
of hours running. First column is Mem Usage, second is VM Size. Yes,
that is well over 900MB :)
Yap, definitively something wrong here. It's running now for 2 hours
and the
Michal Paluchowski wrote on 17/04/2007 at 15:11:25 +1100
subject Mighty memory leak? :
I thought Firefox would be the ultimate memory-eater, but it seems
like The Bat! 3.98.12 beats all :)
The screenshot shows Bat's memory usage on my computer after a couple
of hours running. First column
Hello Michal,
Tuesday, April 17, 2007, 9:40:29 AM, you wrote:
Yap, definitively something wrong here. It's running now for 2 hours
and the VM size is already at 135MB.
Same thing here: VM size 533 Mb (). Maybe it's the autobackup that is
running every night. I'm using OTF by the way.
--
Tuesday, April 17, 2007, 9:25:39 AM, you wrote:
Maybe it's the autobackup that is running every night.
Can't be. I'm not using it.
As for plugins, I have only the Bayes Filter Plugin (not! BayesIt),
which hasn't been updated for a while anyway.
--
Michal Paluchowski
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hallo Michael,
On Tue, 17 Apr 2007 06:11:25 +0200GMT (17-4-2007, 6:11 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
MP The screenshot shows Bat's memory usage on my computer after a couple
MP of hours running. First column is Mem Usage, second is VM Size. Yes,
MP that is well over 900MB
Confirmed.
On
Hello all,
Tuesday, April 17, 2007, Roelof Otten wrote:
MP The screenshot shows Bat's memory usage on my computer after a couple
MP of hours running. First column is Mem Usage, second is VM Size. Yes,
MP that is well over 900MB
Confirmed.
On starting TB it uses 117 MB over here, after two
Hello Michal,
Tuesday, April 17, 2007, 12:11:25 AM, you wrote:
MP I thought Firefox would be the ultimate memory-eater, but it seems
MP like The Bat! 3.98.12 beats all :)
MP The screenshot shows Bat's memory usage on my computer after a couple
MP of hours running. First column is Mem Usage,
Hello Michal,
I thought Firefox would be the ultimate memory-eater, but it seems
like The Bat! 3.98.12 beats all :)
The screenshot shows Bat's memory usage on my computer after a couple
of hours running. First column is Mem Usage, second is VM Size. Yes,
that is well over 900MB :)
·---·-Date---·
| QA mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [1] | 2007-04-17 |
·---··
[Reply to: »Michal Paluchowski« · 2007-04-17 · 06:11 h (CET)]
Hello, Michal!
The screenshot shows Bat's
Hello Michal,
Confirmed here also. Has a BT report been open? If not, RIT may not
take any action to correct this.
I'm not registered in the BT, so can someone else please file a
report?
You discovered the leak and you deserve the honour of opening it ;)
It's easy, go to
Tuesday, April 17, 2007, 5:56:41 PM, you wrote:
You discovered the leak and you deserve the honour of opening it ;)
It's easy, go to https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/main_page.php and sign up.
Ah, well... I guess one more BT registration won't harm. I live on
them anyway, most of the time on the
Hello all,
Tuesday, April 17, 2007, Michal Paluchowski wrote:
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=6341
so what I will do is comment on this issue :)
confirmed and priority increased to High.
--
Bye
Marek Mikus
Czech support of The Bat!
http://www.thebat.cz
Using the best The Bat!
Tuesday, April 17, 2007, 2:18:03 PM, you wrote:
Confirmed here also. Has a BT report been open? If not, RIT may not
take any action to correct this.
I'm not registered in the BT, so can someone else please file a
report?
--
Michal Paluchowski
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello Michal,
Unfortunately someone did beat me to the leak by around 24 hours:
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=6341
so what I will do is comment on this issue :)
You have to be quick if you want to get the honour ;-)
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using
I thought Firefox would be the ultimate memory-eater, but it seems
like The Bat! 3.98.12 beats all :)
The screenshot shows Bat's memory usage on my computer after a couple
of hours running. First column is Mem Usage, second is VM Size. Yes,
that is well over 900MB :)
--
Michal Paluchowski
[-] memory leaks
A problem reported with the last beta on the list and in bug track was
memory leak issues. Specifically, the more you used The Bat, the
higher and higher the memory usage would climb. Then, if you
minimized the program, memory usage would drop significantly. Then
once you
In the beta series, the leak was report on the bug track at
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4925
It is very much present in this public release.
Will this be addressed in the next beta. Currently, it does not take
much to run it up to 75 when doing a round of mail responses.
Jerry
--
Hello Wayne,
I am fairly new to the list, I'm not sure what you mean. Is Robo one
of the developers? In other words, if this issue is being looked into,
then I am satisfied and I will stop posting about it.
Yes, he's a developer, I was told that he's working on it.
--
Vili
The Bat 3.51.7 on
WH One more thing that I noticed on this topic: Open The Bat! and
WH close it without doing anything else. Do this several times.
WH Notice how the memory footprint increases significantly each
WH time!! I am now up to 67 MB after about 8 or 10 times!
I substantially reduced the number of
Hello Wayne,
WH One more thing that I noticed on this topic: Open The Bat! and
WH close it without doing anything else. Do this several times.
WH Notice how the memory footprint increases significantly each
WH time!! I am now up to 67 MB after about 8 or 10 times!
I substantially reduced the
Good day, tbbeta.
Sample message, which being replied by ftpmail generates а couple of
uuencoded messages. Then received part is chosen, TB hangs up to a
minute and shows raw UUE data.
The volume of occupied memory comes nearer to 100-120 MBytes. It's so
from early v2.
--
WBR, Vladimir
Hello Vili,
On Thursday, July 21, 2005, at 6:57:46 AM, you wrote
re: Memory leak?:
V As I learnt it, it came with new GUI, and Robo is working on it to fix
V it.
I am fairly new to the list, I'm not sure what you mean. Is Robo one
of the developers? In other words, if this issue is being looked
Hello Wayne!
On Thursday, July 21, 2005, 12:25 PM, you wrote:
V As I learnt it, it came with new GUI, and Robo is working on it to fix
V it.
I am fairly new to the list, I'm not sure what you mean. Is Robo one
of the developers? In other words, if this issue is being looked into,
then I am
Hello Clive,
On Sunday, July 17, 2005, at 7:37:06 AM, you wrote
re: Memory leak?:
When I start TB!, it takes 38 MB RAM. After reading some mail and
sending one out, it takes 46 MB. Sometimes it goes up to 57 MB and
it becomes slow to CLOSE the mails and CLOSE TB! itself. Now I didnt
use IMAP
Inreplytomid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
VHellotbbeta,
VWhenIstartTB!,ittakes38MBRAM.Afterreadingsomemailand
Vsendingoneout,ittakes46MB.Sometimesitgoesupto57MBandit
VbecomesslowtoCLOSEthemailsandCLOSETB!itself.NowI
Vdidntuse
VIMAP(removedtemporarly),whileItried.
Hello Goncalo,
I have TB! running for almost an hour, I'm replying to TBBeta and
this it the memory consumption.
I sent this to BT, please support it if you think:
http://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4925
Summary:Memory leak
Description:
On TBBETA we had more
When I start TB!, it takes 38 MB RAM. After reading some mail and
sending one out, it takes 46 MB. Sometimes it goes up to 57 MB and
it becomes slow to CLOSE the mails and CLOSE TB! itself. Now I didnt
use IMAP (removed temporarly), while I tried.
This is an old problem that's been discussed
Sunday, July 17, 2005, 6:18:19 AM, (Internet Time - @512) you wrote:
Hello Vili,
V Hello Goncalo,
I have TB! running for almost an hour, I'm replying to TBBeta and
this it the memory consumption.
V I sent this to BT, please support it if you think:
V
Hello tbbeta,
When I start TB!, it takes 38 MB RAM. After reading some mail and
sending one out, it takes 46 MB. Sometimes it goes up to 57 MB and it
becomes slow to CLOSE the mails and CLOSE TB! itself. Now I didnt use
IMAP (removed temporarly), while I tried.
But with IMAP, I have seen
Hello tbbeta,
Ok, I found the cause of the memory leak. I know, that there must be
a leak, I felt it :) ...:
1. Check the mem. need of TB! in task manager. Lets say it is X MB.
2. Ctrl+N, new mail. And just close it, dont do anything. Repeat it,
for example 10 times.
3. Check the mem. need
Hello Vili,
On Saturday, July 16, 2005, at 3:21:26 PM, you wrote
re: Memory leak?:
V When I start TB!, it takes 38 MB RAM. After reading some mail and
V sending one out, it takes 46 MB. Sometimes it goes up to 57 MB and it
V becomes slow to CLOSE the mails and CLOSE TB! itself. Now I
V
Saturday, July 16, 2005, 2:27:26 PM, (Internet Time - @852) you wrote:
Hello Vili,
V Hello tbbeta,
V Ok, I found the cause of the memory leak. I know, that there must be
V a leak, I felt it :) ...:
V 1. Check the mem. need of TB! in task manager. Lets say it is X MB.
V 2. Ctrl+N, new mail
On Saturday, July 16, 2005 at 2:27:26 PM [GMT -0500], Vili wrote:
1. Check the mem. need of TB! in task manager. Lets say it is X MB.
2. Ctrl+N, new mail. And just close it, dont do anything. Repeat it,
for example 10 times.
3. Check the mem. need of TB! in task manager. It will be ca.
Saturday, July 16, 2005, 2:27:26 PM, (Internet Time - @852) you wrote:
Hello Vili,
V Hello tbbeta,
V Ok, I found the cause of the memory leak. I know, that there must be
V a leak, I felt it :) ...:
V 1. Check the mem. need of TB! in task manager. Lets say it is X MB.
V 2. Ctrl+N, new mail
Hello Roelof,
On Saturday, July 16, 2005, at 4:28:46 PM, you wrote
re: Memory leak in the last version, I found it! :))):
RO Well, I was using the AVG plug-in and BayesIt.
Not here. Memory leak is occurring without it. Just checked, TB is
using 63 MB. That's almost twice MS Access with a huge
Hello Vili everyone else,
on 16-Jul-2005 at 21:27 you (Vili) wrote:
Ok, I found the cause of the memory leak. I know, that there must be
a leak, I felt it :) ...:
[...]
Please confirm it.
I can confirm this, too - however, when I minimize TB to the system tray
and then open it again
Hello Alexander,
Ok, I found the cause of the memory leak. I know, that there must be
a leak, I felt it :) ...:
[...]
Please confirm it.
I can confirm this, too - however, when I minimize TB to the system
tray
and then open it again, memory usage is back to normal again
(28mb after
analysis...
http://www.sysinternals.com/Utilities/ProcessExplorer.html
BTW it is freeware with no spyware :)
I check it, thanks! After we, i.e. RL will fix this current memory
leak issue, I would like to check the leaks related to IMAP, if any.
--
Vili
The Bat 3.51.4 on Windows XP 5.1 2600
Hello Michael,
Then I switched over to a POP account and on the Process Explorer when
I hit CTL-N the Private Bytes History jumped to 54 mb from about 3
mb. I have attached a screen shot.
Maybe you can make some kind of sense out of this, as I am no
programer. :)
I will look into it, thx!!!
Hi TBBETA
I previously reported a memory leak in RC1 and logged it as
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4531, yet have received only 1
confirmation in Bugtrack. I assume the RIT developers assign priority for
fixes based on Bugtrack confirmations / requests etc, so if you have
experienced
Hello List, hello 9Val,
as https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=3915 hasn't changed it's
status since my note added I wanted to make sure it gets recognized
before the final is released. I'd consider this RTV-memory-bug a real
show stopper and therefore vote against a final version without this
or by cancelling it).
Since I'm still on a very old beta, I would appreciate confirmations
from users with current betas. I'll add a BT item as soon as someone has
confirmed the memory leak.
This is even worse now, according to my Task Manager, TB!'s memory usage
goes up between 5-7MB each time I
On Thursday, October 14, 2004, 16:01, Marcus Ohlström wrote:
This is even worse now, according to my Task Manager, TB!'s memory
usage goes up between 5-7MB each time I open the MicroEd. In addition,
5-7MB of virtual memory is reported as lost too.
When trying after sending the mail, I could
Hello Graham!
On Friday, September 5, 2003 at 9:52:50 AM you wrote:
Well, my own limited testing on TB! With IMAP on mail5.com, was that
everytime TB! Polled the server, memory usage when up by about 100k. I just
sat and watched it. That sounds like a memory leak to me.
It's not. What you
On Friday, March 15, 2002, 12:43:20 PM, Dierk Haasis wrote:
In the last few days I already had the idea to make a small poll
about when TB! is ready for the next release. And - as mentioned
above - my biggest concern was the memory leak.
I fully concur.
--
Dwight A. Corrin
P O Box
Hello Dierk,
14. marec 2002, 20:44:16, you wrote:
DHWhen I tried to change the viewer - never a problem before - TB!
DHtold me I was out of memory and immediately got an AV. It got it
DHover and over again when I OK'ed it.
Something similar happened here: I was using RTV for some
On Saturday, March 2, 2002, 05:47, you wrote:
Oddly enough, I recall something very similar happening
here. I dismissed it as a mistake in reporting by CoolMon. I can't
reproduce it now no matter what I do. But if memory serves me
right, this was around the time I was using beta
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello The Bat! developers,
I'm using The Bat! Version 1.54 Beta/15
Serial Number 8AA0F474
under Windows 95 4.0 Build 67306684 C
and would like to report a bug
The bug description:
Memory leakage on Windows 95
Steps to reproduce
Hello Dierk,
On 6 Dec 2001 at 10:47:57 you wrote (at least in part):
I use it all the time (for testing!!! I don't need true type fonts
*g*)
DH You surely do mean variable pitch fonts? If you really don't need
DH TrueType (which, BTW, is a trademark) you are either not on Windows or
DH use
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Peter!
On 6 Dec 2001 at 09:15:13 you wrote:
No, but this may be due to the fact I'm running W2K with it's much
improved memory handling.
You are right, from the last discussion on memory leakage (concerning
the new RTV) I remember that
Hello Ali,
Wednesday, December 08, 1999, 4:34:33 PM GMT+0800, Ali Martin wrote:
AM You know, I was thinking of a questionnaire along those lines. You are
AM indeed a worthy member and we will accept you graciously. :) But
AM remember, we seek no remedy for our apparent infirmity.
AM Do you
Hi Ali,
Wednesday, December 08, 1999, 8:34:33 AM, you wrote:
AM Do you feel depressed or restless when your e-mail volume gets low and
AM furthermore, do you fiddle with your e-mail program when
AM disappointingly no mail is awaiting you when you check for it?
ROFL
If you are really
Hello Ali,
Wednesday, December 08, 1999, 2:16:17 PM GMT+0800, Ali Martin wrote:
AM Organization: E-mailaholics anonymous
LOL - would like to ("need to"?) join.
AM Sure. Go right ahead.
Any initiation rituals? ;-)
AM Yes. You absolutely must add your new status to your message header.
AM
70 matches
Mail list logo
