Hello Vili,
Saturday, October 1, 2005, 10:33:24 PM, you wrote:
How the heck a small, one-product software company can go bankrupt?
No sales?
Cyrus is doubtful, too whether he'll be able to release the code as
open source either. To my mind, the best features of TB and Mulberry
rolled together
On 10/1/2005 at 10:17:23 PM [GMT -0500], Rmorris.R wrote:
I've been running v3.61.09 beta all day without interruption. Things
have been quite fine. No hiccups at all really. The main good point is
that I haven't had to restart because the connection has flaked out on
me.
Have not had any
On 10/2/2005 at 7:30:10 AM [GMT -0500], Stuart Cuddy wrote:
Are you referring here to TB! or Mulberry?
TB! of course. :)
--
-= Curtis =-
The Bat! v3.61.09 Echo (Beta) / http://specs.aimlink.name
PGPKey: http://rsakey.aimlink.name
...The best way to win an argument is to be right.
On Sunday, October 2, 2005, 8:45:02 AM, Stuart Cuddy wrote:
3) The counts that show are odd and inconsistent. Sometimes the
count will get marked as read after reading the last message and
then get marked as unread and it takes a while to disappear.
Sometimes counts seem to update for no
On 10/2/2005 at 8:45:02 AM [GMT -0500], Stuart Cuddy wrote:
The problems I still have with IMAP are:
1) Filtering still only works on the first level. In other words if I
have a filter that sets the color for TB beta as red and then sets it
to green if it is to or from me it will temporarily
On 10/2/2005 at 10:01:27 AM [GMT -0500], Stuart Cuddy wrote:
OK, but this is where the strangeness begins. I had already set it up
the way you suggest. For some reason the messages after being set to
my color and then get reset to tbbeta color afterwards even though
there is no filter that
I've tried this version, but this is the one with the IMAP login
problem (mentioned numerous times on this mailing list.), and thus
it is unusable
I don't have any problems at all with this version - and I'm
collecting from two different IMAP servers, too.
--
Regards,
Clive Taylor
Hello Curtis,
Monday, September 26, 2005, 1:47:54 PM, you wrote:
I don't really note any difference in IMAP of recently. Things
continue to work the same.
Like you, I'm using FastMail as my main email service. It's not my
imagination but the latest betas have been all but unusable
Hello Kevin,
Saturday, September 24, 2005, 8:55:32 PM, you wrote:
I think I'm outta here. Mulberry is just so much more robust when it
comes to IMAP handling.
This was my feeling until I returned from holiday this morning to find
that Cyrusoft and Mulberry have gone into receivership. No more
Hi Vili,
On Sat, 1 Oct 2005 23:33:24 +0200 UTC (10/1/2005, 4:33 PM -0500 UTC my
time), Vili wrote:
V How the heck a small, one-product software company can go bankrupt? I
V mean, isnt it possible to sell latest MB anymore to anybody?
there is always more than meets the eye. They had several
On 9/24/2005 at 2:55:32 PM [GMT -0500], Kevin Amazon wrote:
BTW, IMAP IS NOT hard stuff. The RFC is clear and concise and that is
the reason clients such as Thunderbird and Mulberry (and even Outlook)
are pretty flawless at implementation.
I've been running v3.61.09 beta all day without
On 2005-09-24 at 09:39:18 Clive Taylor wrote:
It's a shame, really. There was just one version (3.60.1) which
performed perfectly here under IMAP
Hmm, I've tried this version, but this is the one with the IMAP login
problem (mentioned numerous times on this mailing list.), and thus it
is
On Monday, September 26, 2005, at 05:31 AM, Dimitry Andric
wrote:
Hmm, I've tried this version, but this is the one with the IMAP login
problem (mentioned numerous times on this mailing list.), and thus it
is unusable... :(
Using a FastMail account. Plain IMAP from work and IMAPs from home.
I wrote:
I also can confirm this problem. While TB! has always been slower
updating than my other clients, it became much worse just a few betas ago.
Unfortunately, following the advice to downgrade to 3.60.1 didn't help
me.
I should say, too, that like Curtis, I am using FastMail. I'm
On Monday, September 26, 2005, at 08:56 AM, Keith Russell
wrote:
I went to bed at 10:30 last night and left The Bat! running. When
I checked my mail at 7:35 this morning, The Bat! showed 10 new
messages in my inbox, with the latest showing a time of 2:19 AM.
I started up Thunderbird, and
On Monday, September 26, 2005, at 07:58 AM, Stuart Cuddy
wrote:
I am also using Fastmail and also have a Smarter Mail account
through Gearhost to compare.
Ok
I have been trying color filtering and it seems to be be
very inconsistent.
I've been labelling messages that are replies
Stuart Cuddy wrote:
GS On Sat, 24 Sep 2005 07:20:16 -0500 GMT(9/24/2005, 7:20 AM -0500 GMT),
GS per mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Stuart Cuddy wrote:
I think I will try to download 3.60.1 if it is
still available, if not does anyone have it still?
GS It is still at
Hello Dwight,
Friday, September 23, 2005, 3:57:59 PM, you wrote:
I would agree with this assessment.
It's a shame, really. There was just one version (3.60.1) which
performed perfectly here under IMAP, all the others have been dogs for
me!
--
Regards,
Clive Taylor
TheBat!:3.60.07
Windows XP:
Hi Dimitry Andric
-
On Fri, 23 Sep 2005, at 19:35:57 [GMT +0200] (which was 10:35 AM where
I live) you wrote:
On 2005-09-23 at 16:20:42 Clive Taylor wrote:
Usually though, choosing Abort all tasks in Connection Centre kills
these hanging/repeating
On Friday, September 23, 2005, 9:20:42 AM, Clive Taylor wrote:
The old problems with IMAP mailboxes refusing to update or display
mail without a shutdown or manic clicking on different folders has
returned in recent betas.
I would agree with this assessment.
--
Dwight A. Corrin
928 S
Clive and group,
The old problems with IMAP mailboxes refusing to update or display
mail without a shutdown or manic clicking on different folders has
returned in recent betas.
This problem makes the new betas unusable for me.
This has been going on for quite a while. This is what I end up
On 2005-09-23 at 16:20:42 Clive Taylor wrote:
The old problems with IMAP mailboxes refusing to update or display
mail without a shutdown or manic clicking on different folders has
returned in recent betas.
AFAIK, it has never been away since at least 3.0... :( I still also
regularly have the
Dimitry
AFAIK, it has never been away since at least 3.0... :( I still also
regularly have the ever-repeating IMAP tasks, which eat up 100% CPU
time too.
I think this to really be the case.
Usually though, choosing Abort all tasks in Connection Centre kills
these hanging/repeating tasks
23 matches
Mail list logo
