Re: The Bat! 2.03.16

2003-12-21 Thread Dierk Haasis
Hello Peter! On Sunday, December 21, 2003 at 4:14:26 AM you wrote: Just in opinion: there is no such thing as 'non public beta'. Private beat? Closed beta (circle)? Internal beta? How often did people on this list gripe about bugs, non-functionality, ordering [sic!] RITLabs to thoroughly test

Re: The Bat! 2.03.16

2003-12-21 Thread MAU
Hello Martin, ...but if you have the exact filename in this directory you can download this file - so simple. OK, understand now. -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v2.01.3 Winamp OFF: Current

Re: The Bat! 2.03.16

2003-12-21 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Hi Martin, @21-Dec-2003, 06:55 +0100 (21-Dec 05:55 UK time) Martin Schoch [MS] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck: It is black and white. Please refer to the TBBETA rules. It says *very clearly* that: MS Oh - I think there is still a little bit gray ;-) Didn't we have MS several times

Re: The Bat! 2.03.16

2003-12-21 Thread Miroslav Florensen
Hallo Peter, So, there is some problem: - it's not on the beta download site there is a download site with listed beta files, look here http://beta.thebat.pl/ Miros -- BAT-MAIL.DE.VU - http://bat-mail.de.vu Minimal Design GLYPH - Original GLYPHs - Tools - Splash-Screens Mail-Server

Re: The Bat! 2.03.16

2003-12-20 Thread MaXxX
On Sunday, December 21, 2003, at 4:14:26 AM, Peter Ouwehand sculpted a piece of raw silicon into the thoughts below: Appearantly it's not a beta version, otherwise it should be on the beta list. So either it's an alpha or something between alpha and beta. Now how are we gonna call that in the

Re: The Bat! 2.03.16

2003-12-20 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Hi Peter, @21-Dec-2003, 04:14 +0100 (21-Dec 03:14 UK time) Peter Ouwehand [PO] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck: MDP ... They have been built for a single specific user with a MDP single specific problem to download to test a single specific MDP amendment. ... PO So, there is some

Re: The Bat! 2.03.16

2003-12-20 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Peter, On Sun, 21 Dec 2003 04:59:39 +0100 GMT (21/12/2003, 10:59 +0700 GMT), Peter Ouwehand wrote: TF I understand it isn't available if you browse the directory. You can TF download it when you have the direct link. I'm just a messenger. Don't shoot him/her. Yours was the last posting

Re: The Bat! 2.03.16

2003-12-20 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Hi Peter, @21-Dec-2003, 05:18 +0100 (21-Dec 04:18 UK time) Peter Ouwehand [PO] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck: PO What I still don't understand, MDP, is: why you don't comment to PO the original poster that way, but you do comment to some PO indirect comment (just a messenger). I answer

Re: The Bat! 2.03.16

2003-12-20 Thread Martin Schoch
Hi Marck On Sunday, December 21, 2003 4:50:40 AM you wrote: It is black and white. Please refer to the TBBETA rules. It says *very clearly* that: Oh - I think there is still a little bit gray ;-) Didn't we have several times that RITlabs forgot to announce a new beta? ;-) Have a nice day.

Re: The Bat! 2.03.16

2003-12-20 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Martin, On Sun, 21 Dec 2003 06:55:59 +0100 GMT (21/12/2003, 12:55 +0700 GMT), Martin Schoch wrote: Oh - I think there is still a little bit gray ;-) Didn't we have several times that RITlabs forgot to announce a new beta? ;-) That was in the past - and the rule is clear: if it is not

Re: The Bat! 2.03.16

2003-12-20 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Thomas, On Sun, 21 Dec 2003 13:27:00 +0700 GMT (21/12/2003, 13:27 +0700 GMT), Thomas Fernandez wrote: Oh - I think there is still a little bit gray ;-) Didn't we have several times that RITlabs forgot to announce a new beta? ;-) That was in the past - and the rule is clear: if it is