Hi Peter, @21-Dec-2003, 05:18 +0100 (21-Dec 04:18 UK time) Peter Ouwehand [PO] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck:
PO> What I still don't understand, MDP, is: why you don't comment to PO> the original poster that way, but you do comment to some PO> indirect comment (just a messenger). I answer each post according to content. The original post of the URL was dealt with by others. No comment was necessary. I first responded to this thread when someone queried the practice of releasing non-public betas. My reply was on that issue. My reply to you was on the further issues that you raised in reply to me. All I have done was to answer the questions you asked or correct any mistaken impressions you may have had. PO> (oh, something else to remember, you got the advantage being PO> native English. I'm NOT, a lot on here are NOT) Of course. I always try to remember this. I understood what you were saying perfectly and sought only to clarify where your assumptions were not quite right. Anyway, we've gone on quite long enough on this side line and it has veered off topic. At least it has surfaced a clarification of the rules, and that's a good thing. -- Cheers -- .\\arck D Pearlstone -- List moderator TB! v2.03.10 on Windows XP 5.1.2600 Service Pack 1 '
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
________________________________________________________ Current beta is 2.03.10 | "Using TBBETA" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
