Hello, the Bat! list recipients,
Thursday, March 09, 2000, Jason Ellis wrote to [EMAIL PROTECTED] about
Forwards and e-mail addresses?:
JE> This afternoon one of my coworkers brought it to my attention that
JE> whenever I forward an e-mail to him, he does not get the original
JE> sender's e-mail
Hello, the Bat! list recipients,
Thursday, March 09, 2000, Hendrik Hannemann wrote to TBUDL about
(No Subject):
HH> What is the difference between using IMAP and POP?
IMAP is not fully implemented yet.
HH> Is there a way to copy messages between folders on the server
HH> (reason for using
Hello Allie,
Thank you!! That worked! Don't kno why that wasn't in there by
default, but I'm so glad this list exists to help with problems like
this.
Thanks,
Jason
> On Wed, 8 Mar 2000 23:34:47 -0500, Jason Ellis wrote:
>> That is my point - when I forward a message, that doesn't show up
Hello Jason,
It sounds like it is your particular installation that is not
inserting the headers. Perhaps you have modified your default
templates?
Best regards,
Justin D. Paine
Windows NT 5.0 Build:2195
Wednesday, March 08, 2000 8:43:26 PM
I never think of the future - it comes soon enough.
On Wed, 8 Mar 2000 23:34:47 -0500, Jason Ellis wrote:
> That is my point - when I forward a message, that doesn't show up.
> That whole header doesn't show up.
The forward header is created by the forward templates. This
is the template header that you need:
This is a forwarded message
Hello Thomas,
That is my point - when I forward a message, that doesn't show up.
That whole header doesn't show up.
Jason
> Dear Jason,
> I just forwarded your message to the list and fail to see your point.
> Cheers,
> Thomas. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ===8<=
Dear Jason,
I just forwarded your message to the list and fail to see your point.
Cheers,
Thomas. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
===8<==This is a forwarded message=
From: Jason Ellis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thursda
Hello
Ok, follow up on the auriate story
(this time then from a security expert (g)):
Quote:
I have been contacted by several legal firms who have requested that I post
a message in their behalf.
They are seeking anyone who is interested in becoming a representative in
your home state for a cla
Hi List,
This afternoon one of my coworkers brought it to my attention that
whenever I forward an e-mail to him, he does not get the original
sender's e-mail address. I went searching through the various settings
but couldn't find anything that seemed to indicate a way to make sure
the e-mail add
Hello Allie Martin,
Responding to your article on Thursday, March 09, 2000 at 20:55:17 GMT
-0500 (which was 09/03/2000 8:55 GMT +0700 my Local Time) :
>> Now I wonder if someone will ask what NT has to do with VMS (g)
AM> OK. The man (I forgot his name) who designed NT had a lot to do with
AM
If I remember correctly. There was once was a guy named Dave Cutler who
was the architect for Digital's OS - VMS (right?) - MS hired him to
architect Windows NT.
Jay
On Wed, 8 Mar 2000, Allie Martin wrote:
> On Thu, 9 Mar 2000 08:50:24 +0700, tracer wrote:
> > Now I wonder if someone will ask
Hi Marck,
On Wed, 8 Mar 2000 12:30:20 +GMT (08/03/2000, 20:30 +0800GMT),
Marck D. Pearlstone wrote:
S>> (which will be possible soon here in UK with latest news of FREE
S>> unmetered access from April 17th...about time n'all)
MDP> I've been noticing stuff about that recently - please can y
On Thu, 9 Mar 2000 08:50:24 +0700, tracer wrote:
> Now I wonder if someone will ask what NT has to do with VMS (g)
OK. The man (I forgot his name) who designed NT had a lot to
do with VMS development as well, and because of this the design of
both OS's share striking similarities? :)
--
Hello Marck D. Pearlstone,
On Thu, 9 Mar 2000 00:32:45 + GMT your local time,
which was Thursday, March 09, 2000, 7:32:45 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Marck D. Pearlstone wrote:
> Sadly that does not concur with my experience of NT, which does
> outlast Win9x in the stay-alive stak
Hi John,
On 08 March 2000 at 08:23:37 GMT +0900 (which was 23:23 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points:
>>> Of course, you could always load Windows, then TB! and leave
>>> running 24/7/365, ad infinitum...
>> Sadly, windoze won't do that reliably :-(((. It need
Hello TBUDL,
What is the difference between using IMAP and POP? Is there a way to
copy messages between folders on the server (reason for using IMAP
over POP). And can anyone tell me how to make a certain LDAP
directory the default directory for name checking?
Thx for your help
Best r
"Marck D. Pearlstone" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>S> Of course, you could always load Windows, then TB! and leave
>S> running 24/7/365, ad infinitum...
>
>Sadly, windoze won't do that reliably :-(((. It needs a reboot at
>least three times weekly to remain stable.
True of Win9x, but
Hello Simon & all fellow TBUDL members,
Wednesday, March 08, 2000, 10:41:16 AM, Simon wrote:
S> Perhaps I should dig out and install an old 486 processor again.
S> That way I wouldn't be able to launch 2 or 3 apps in the space of
S> about 1 sec! That might cure it ;-)
Now that you mention it,
Hello tracer & all fellow TBUDL members,
Wednesday, March 08, 2000, 4:24:29 AM, tracer wrote in response to my saying:
>> I just shut down TB! 1.39 and while it reopened, I opened EccoPro
>> with no problems, under an early Win95. Is the version of windows
>> likely to figure in this problem?
How-do-you-do,
Christopher J. Trybowski posted to [EMAIL PROTECTED] making the following
comments:
CJT> just remember not to run anything after TB is launched (till at least
CJT> parts of its window appear).
Yeah, that was the bit I was forgetting. I usually leave TB! running, but on
the odd
Hello Simon,
On Tuesday, March 07, 2000 you wrote:
> How-do-you-do,
How do you do!
> I have noticed that TB! very occasionally seems to freeze with Windows when
> I launch it just as I make a connection to the Net. It is always just as TB!
> launches at the same time the connection is opened. I
Hi Simon,
On 08 March 2000 at 12:01:51 GMT + (which was 12:01 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points:
S> Of course, you could always load Windows, then TB! and leave
S> running 24/7/365, ad infinitum...
Sadly, windoze won't do that reliably :-(((. It need
How-do-you-do,
Marck D. Pearlstone posted to [EMAIL PROTECTED] making the following comments:
MDP> This is what I do, having a shortcut to "startup.bat" in my startup
MDP> folder.
Yes, this is what I figured. I was using Robert Simpson's 'NetLaunch' to
load and shut down TB! (as well as ever
Hi tracer,
On 08 March 2000 at 17:21:39 GMT +0700 (which was 10:21 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points:
>>> Openning another program while The Bat is opening will kill my
>>> system. Sure... Its easy to do as well or to forget it and then
>>> nothing helps excep
Hello Listmembers,
On Wed, 8 Mar 2000 at 10:11:09 [GMT +] Simon wrote:
> I am running TB! on Windows 98 SE 4.10 A. What about the rest of
> you?
I never had Win98 on one of my systems after I installed it once at
customer's site. Concerning Win NT4 -> W2000 Pro, TB never cause
Hello Simon,
On Wed, 8 Mar 2000 10:11:09 + GMT your local time,
which was Wednesday, March 08, 2000, 5:11:09 PM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Simon wrote:
> How-do-you-do,
> Douglas Hinds posted to [EMAIL PROTECTED] making the following comments:
DH>> Is the version of windows likely to figure
Hello Douglas Hinds,
On Wed, 08 Mar 2000 00:40:41 -0600 GMT your local time,
which was Wednesday, March 08, 2000, 1:40:41 PM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Douglas Hinds wrote:
> Hello tracer & all fellow TBUDL members,
> Tuesday, March 07, 2000, 6:32:48 PM, tracer wrote:
t>> Openning another prog
Hello Januk Aggarwal,
On Tue, 7 Mar 2000 19:09:26 -0800 GMT your local time,
which was Wednesday, March 08, 2000, 10:09:26 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Januk Aggarwal wrote:
> Hello tracer,
> On Tuesday, March 07, 2000 at 07:32:48 GMT +0700 (which was 4:32 PM
> where I live) [EMAIL PROTECTE
How-do-you-do,
Douglas Hinds posted to [EMAIL PROTECTED] making the following comments:
DH> Is the version of windows likely to figure in this problem?
May very well be, but there again...
I am running TB! on Windows 98 SE 4.10 A. What about the rest of you?
Slán anois,
Simon sen
29 matches
Mail list logo
